Establishment profile
DUROX COMPANY
12312 ALAMEDA DR., STRONGSVILLE, OH, 44149
Operated by Wabtec Corporation · 1 of 12 establishments
326291 — Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use
Summary
DUROX COMPANY has accumulated 14 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 14 years of recorded history, with $29,830 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 70th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 161 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 44th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
DUROX COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 14 distinct standards shown · 14 citations in this view · $29,830 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I A | 1 | 1 | $4,200 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $4,200 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A02 | 1 | 1 | $4,200 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D04 I | 1 | 1 | $4,200 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $3,600 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L01 I | 1 | 1 | $2,400 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $1,960 | Jul 2014 | Jul 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 G02 | 1 | 1 | $1,800 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 1 | 1 | $1,800 | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Jul 2014 | Jul 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0184 E03 I | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2014 | Jul 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H01 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 K06 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 D01 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3262 within OH. Peer group: 161 employers. This establishment has 14 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 50 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 2 statutes · 106 violations · $22,901 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Sep 2016 | 1 | 56 | 56 | $22,901 | — |
| FMLA (family & medical leave) | Sep 2016 | 1 | 50 | — | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 106 violations · $22,901 in backwages · 56 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2014 – Sep 2016 | All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing | FLSAFMLA | 106 | 56 | $22,901 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUROX CO 12312 ALAMEDA DR · STRONGSVILLE, OH, 44149 | RCRA | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | May 2008 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for DUROX COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-05-15 | Complaint | 3 | 2 | $3,430 | |
| 2011-10-20 | Complaint | 11 | 9 | $26,400 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
DUROX COMPANY is one of 12 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Wabtec Corporation.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Wabtec Corporation across all 12 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in rubber product manufacturing for mechanical use within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- PREFERRED COMPOUNDING CORP.BARBERTON — 4 federal enforcement records
- METEOR SEALING SYSTEMS, LLCDOVER — 3 federal enforcement records
- QUALITY SYNTHETIC RUBBER INCTWINSBURG — 2 federal enforcement records
- ELBEX CORPORATIONKENT — 2 federal enforcement records
- UNI-GRIP, INC.UPPER SANDUSKY — 1 federal enforcement record
- SUMMERS RUBBER COMPANYBELLEVUE — 1 federal enforcement record
- ZHONGDING USA, INC.STRASBURG — 1 federal enforcement record
- SYSTEM SEALS, INC.CLEVELAND — 1 federal enforcement record
- RUBEX INC.GROVE CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- ASHTABULA RUBBER CO.ASHTABULA — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Wabtec Corporation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- THERMAL TRANSFER CORPORATIONDUQUESNE, PA — 2 federal enforcement records
- MICROPHOR INC.WILLITS, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- WABTEC CORPORATIONCARSON CITY, NV — 2 federal enforcement records
- WABTEC CorporationBERWICK, PA — 1 federal enforcement record
- WABTEC CORPORATIONKANSAS CITY, MO — 1 federal enforcement record
- WABTECCEDAR RAPIDS, IA — 1 federal enforcement record
- SWIGER COIL SYSTEMS INC.CLEVELAND, OH — 1 federal enforcement record
- WABTECGREENSBURG, PA — 1 federal enforcement record
- Wabtec CorporationGROVE CITY, PA — 1 federal enforcement record
- WABTECCOLUMBIA, SC — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Wabtec Corporation locationsParent rollup
- Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical UseAll employers in this industry
- Employers in OHState-wide enforcement data
- Rubber Product Manufacturing in OHIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on DUROX COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Wabtec Corporation, which operates 12 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is DUROX COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- DUROX COMPANY has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 14 violations and $29,830 in total penalties.
- How does DUROX COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- DUROX COMPANY operates in the rubber product manufacturing for mechanical use industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.5. DUROX COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.5.