Establishment profile
DUKE MANUFACTURING
601 DUKE DRIVE, SEDALIA, MO, 65301
Operated by Duke Manufacturing Company · 1 of 2 establishments
333241 — Food Product Machinery Manufacturing
EIN 431548196
Summary
DUKE MANUFACTURING has accumulated 32 OSHA violations across 13 inspections over 40 years of recorded history, with $39,274 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 98th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 41 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
DUKE MANUFACTURING appears in OSHA workplace safety and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
54% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 7 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $39,274 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $13,188 | Feb 1998 | Mar 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0255 B04 | 2 | 2 | $7,900 | Feb 1998 | Jun 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 2 | 2 | $1,374 | Feb 1998 | Sep 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $2,250 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $2,250 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C05 I | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F04 | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 1 | 1 | $900 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 K01 | 1 | 1 | $900 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0213 H03 | 1 | 1 | $900 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 1 | 1 | $800 | Sep 2005 | Sep 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0254 B04 III | 1 | 1 | $675 | Feb 1998 | Feb 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 1 | 1 | $675 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III | 1 | 1 | $675 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III | 1 | 1 | $600 | Sep 2005 | Sep 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E06 I | 1 | 1 | $563 | Sep 2005 | Sep 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 D03 IIA | 1 | 1 | $563 | Sep 2005 | Sep 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0133 A01 | 1 | 1 | $563 | Mar 1998 | Mar 1998 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3332 within MO. Peer group: 41 employers. This establishment has 32 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 122 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Nov 2022 – Aug 2024
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2024 | Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area unspecified | Toes(s), toenail(s) | Amputation | |
| Nov 6, 2022 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities · 1 marked inactive.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKE MANUFACTURING CO 601 DUKE DR · SEDALIA, MO, 65301 | WaterRCRATRI | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | May 2009 | View → |
DUKE MANUFACTURING 601 PAYLESS DRIVE · SEDALIA, MO, 65301 | — | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for DUKE MANUFACTURING. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2022-11-15 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $10,938 | |
| 2020-07-22 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2009-05-06 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-08-03 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-08-03 | Planned | 3 | 3 | $2,200 | |
| 2005-08-03 | Planned | 4 | 3 | $1,125 | |
| 1998-05-20 | Follow-up | 1 | — | $7,000 | |
| 1998-02-03 | Planned | 19 | 16 | $14,974 | |
| 1998-02-03 | Planned | 1 | 1 | $563 | |
| 1992-06-03 | Planned | 3 | 3 | $2,475 | |
| 1990-01-10 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1985-10-11 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
DUKE MANUFACTURING is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Duke Manufacturing Company.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Duke Manufacturing Company across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in food product machinery manufacturing within MO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- ENSIGHT SOLUTIONS LLCKANSAS CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- TBL INC. DBA TABS LIMITEDSAINT JOSEPH — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Duke Manufacturing Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- DUKE MANUFACTURING COMPANYST. LOUIS, MO — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Duke Manufacturing Company locationsParent rollup
- Food Product Machinery ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MOState-wide enforcement data
- Food Product Machinery in MOIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on DUKE MANUFACTURING from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Duke Manufacturing Company, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is DUKE MANUFACTURING's OSHA violation history?
- DUKE MANUFACTURING has 13 OSHA inspections on record with 32 violations and $39,273.5 in total penalties.
- How does DUKE MANUFACTURING's safety record compare to its industry?
- DUKE MANUFACTURING operates in the food product machinery manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.3. DUKE MANUFACTURING's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 0.9.