Skip to main content

Establishment profile

DETROIT THERMAL

541 MADISON, DETROIT, MI, 48226
221330Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
6
over 22 years
Violations
50
$7,645 in penalties
Penalties
$7,645
$153 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

DETROIT THERMAL has accumulated 50 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 22 years of recorded history, with $7,645 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 97th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 403 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 92nd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

DETROIT THERMAL appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
6
0.3 / yr · last 22 yrs
Violations
50
2.3 / yr
Penalties
$7,645
$153 avg / violation
46% serious54% other
Inspection trigger · planned
3 of 6
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 6

67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 21 citations in this view · $7,495 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 IA22$1,100Oct 2003Aug 2009
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I11$875Oct 2003Oct 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0111$525Oct 2003Oct 2003
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111$525Oct 2003Oct 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 G0111$525Oct 2003Oct 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D0411$525Oct 2003Oct 2003
29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 II11$375Oct 2014Oct 2014
29 CFR 1910.0303 B07 IV11$375Oct 2014Oct 2014
408.1071611$375Oct 2014Oct 2014
408.10213(2)11$300Oct 2014Oct 2014
29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I11$300Aug 2009Aug 2009
29 CFR 4081.02150211$240Aug 2009Aug 2009
29 CFR 4081.00340811$240Aug 2009Aug 2009
29 CFR 4081.07270111$240Aug 2009Aug 2009
29 CFR 4081.40090911$240Aug 2009Aug 2009
408.13312(1)11$180Oct 2014Oct 2014
29 CFR 4081.00341011$180Aug 2009Aug 2009
29 CFR 4084.22230111$175Aug 2004Aug 2004
29 CFR 4084.17251011$100Aug 2004Aug 2004
29 CFR 4084.11260511$100Aug 2004Aug 2004

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

97th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 2213 within MI. Peer group: 403 employers. This establishment has 50 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
95th
peer median: $225
Inspection frequency
92nd
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−3.2
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−4.9

Reported for 78 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
3.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
3
Complaint
2
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in MI — for DETROIT THERMAL, not this location alone

Total cases
5
Unfair labor practice
5

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other DETROIT THERMAL locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 5 cases · 5 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
07-CA-206980Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Jan 2019ClosedRegion 07, Detroit, Michigan
07-CA-202689Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 07, Detroit, Michigan
07-CA-179896Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 07, Detroit, Michigan
07-CA-061574Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Nov 2011ClosedRegion 07, Detroit, Michigan
07-CA-053517Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 07, Detroit, Michigan

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for DETROIT THERMAL. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$0
Obligated (all-time)
$11.0M
Awards
2
Top agency
General Services Administration
$11.0M
Largest awards
  • General Services Administration
    STEAM UTILITY SERVICE TO THE MCNAMARA FEDERAL BUILDING.
    contract · Last action 2021-03-22
    $5,739,794
  • General Services Administration
    STEAM SERVICES FOR LEVIN US COURTHOUSE.
    contract · Last action 2021-03-11
    $5,293,632

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 221330 - STEAM AND AIR-CONDITIONING SUPPLY. Last action: 2021-03-22. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2014-07-31Planned155$1,605
2009-06-10Planned217$1,665
2005-03-29Complaint0$0
2004-06-26Planned85$525
2004-01-06Follow-up0$0
2003-09-08Complaint66$3,850

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in steam and air-conditioning supply within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on DETROIT THERMAL from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is DETROIT THERMAL's OSHA violation history?
DETROIT THERMAL has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 50 violations and $7,645 in total penalties.
How does DETROIT THERMAL's safety record compare to its industry?
DETROIT THERMAL operates in the steam and air-conditioning supply industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.9. DETROIT THERMAL's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 3.2.