Skip to main content

Establishment profile

CNH INDUSTRIAL

3401 FIRST AVENUE NORTH, FARGO, ND, 58102
Operated by CNH Industrial · 1 of 5 establishments
333111Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
EIN 760433811

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 9 years
Violations
1
$4,527 in penalties
Penalties
$4,527
$4,527 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

CNH INDUSTRIAL has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 9 years of recorded history, with $4,527 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 21st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 68 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

CNH INDUSTRIAL appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 9 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$4,527
$4,527 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $4,527 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$4,527Jan 2017Jan 2017

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

21st

Below average violations in NAICS 3331 within ND. Peer group: 68 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
63rd
peer median: $2,953
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
3.7
vs industry
+1.2
TRIR
4.7
vs industry
+0.3

Reported for 736 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
4.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2021

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Exposure to environmental heat

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 9, 2021Exposure to environmental heatBODY SYSTEMSHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
9 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for CNH INDUSTRIAL. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for CNH INDUSTRIAL. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in ND — for CNH Industrial, not this location alone

Total cases
10
Unfair labor practice
10

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other CNH Industrial locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 10 cases · 10 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
18-CA-365972Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Apr 2026ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-328736Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-281686Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Jan 2024ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-254294Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-253605Unfair labor practiceDec 2019Feb 2020ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-247925Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-246474Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-239820Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-219113Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-144414Unfair labor practiceJan 2015Mar 2015ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for CNH INDUSTRIAL. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for CNH INDUSTRIAL. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for CNH INDUSTRIAL. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2016-12-14Planned11$4,527

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

CNH INDUSTRIAL is one of 5 establishments rolled up under the parent organization CNH Industrial.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of CNH Industrial across all 5 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in farm machinery and equipment manufacturing within ND, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by CNH Industrial, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on CNH INDUSTRIAL from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup CNH Industrial, which operates 5 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is CNH INDUSTRIAL's OSHA violation history?
CNH INDUSTRIAL has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $4,527 in total penalties.
How does CNH INDUSTRIAL's safety record compare to its industry?
CNH INDUSTRIAL operates in the farm machinery and equipment manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.4. CNH INDUSTRIAL's self-reported DART rate is 3.68 compared to an industry average of 2.5.