Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

AT&T

INTERSECTION 11TH AVENUE NORTH/23RD STREET NORTH, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 35203
Operated by AT&T Inc · 1 of 2,000 establishments
221111 — Hydroelectric Power Generation

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 33 years
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

AT&T has accumulated 0 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 33 years of recorded history.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

AT&T appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 33 yrs
Violations
0
0.0 / yr
Penalties
$0
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 2

Peer comparison

0th

Fewer violations than most other employers in NAICS 2211 within AL. Peer group: 45 employers. This establishment has 0 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
0th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
75th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.1
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−1.7

Reported for 60 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.7
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AT&T. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
13 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in AL — for AT&T Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
129
Unfair labor practice
129

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other AT&T Inc locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 100 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
10-CA-379360Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-379357Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-378761Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-378471Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-378036Unfair labor practiceDec 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-377168Unfair labor practiceDec 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-361599Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-358484Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-356001Unfair labor practiceDec 2024Mar 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-351092Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-350517Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-340384Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-340379Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-339544Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-335367Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Aug 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-335163Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-329359Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Oct 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-323832Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-323284Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-310385Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Jan 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-306007Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Mar 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-305260Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-303330Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-303205Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-302575Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Feb 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-302195Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Feb 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-302188Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Feb 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-298087Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-288489Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-283801Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Oct 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-270005Unfair labor practiceDec 2020Dec 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-267623Unfair labor practiceOct 2020Feb 2021ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-265923Unfair labor practiceSep 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-265262Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-265256Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-265145Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-251539Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-251535Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-251528Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249878Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249442Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249436Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249435Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249434Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249433Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-249430Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-245200Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-234787Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-232010Unfair labor practiceDec 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-208239Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-208200Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Oct 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-205644Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-204258Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Jan 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-203039Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Apr 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-201446Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-200667Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-198176Unfair labor practiceMay 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-197383Unfair labor practiceApr 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-193176Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-192570Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-191635Unfair labor practiceJan 2017Feb 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-189510Unfair labor practiceDec 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-188017Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Nov 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-187870Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-187315Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-187266Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-187254Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-185884Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-185880Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-185877Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-184308Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-180911Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-179602Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-178559Unfair labor practiceJun 2016Nov 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-178306Unfair labor practiceJun 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-177340Unfair labor practiceMay 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-172390Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-169665Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Feb 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-164043Unfair labor practiceNov 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-162068Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-161265Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Nov 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-160291Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-155904Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Sep 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-154368Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-154047Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Jun 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-151311Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Jun 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-149457Unfair labor practiceApr 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-149157Unfair labor practiceMar 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-149144Unfair labor practiceMar 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-148280Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-148279Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Mar 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-148019Unfair labor practiceMar 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-145602Unfair labor practiceFeb 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-141096Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-139646Unfair labor practiceOct 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-128233Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-127705Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-127703Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-119145Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Apr 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-104275Unfair labor practiceMay 2013Jun 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AT&T. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AT&T. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — AT&T INC. (across 125 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$435.6M
Obligated (all-time)
$9.4B
Awards (all-time)
63,960

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2013-05-17Unprogrammed Other0—$0
1992-07-28Complaint0—$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

AT&T is one of 2,000 establishments rolled up under the parent organization AT&T Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of AT&T Inc across all 2,000 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in hydroelectric power generation within AL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by AT&T Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

  • SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONEWICHITA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TSACRAMENTO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T, INC.NORCROSS, GA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TMINNEAPOLIS, MN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&THOUSTON, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT & TSAN RAMON, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TRENO, NV — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TCERRITOS, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T CORP.NASHVILLE, TN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TArlington, TX — 2 federal enforcement records

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AT&T from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup AT&T Inc, which operates 2,000 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is AT&T's OSHA violation history?
AT&T has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 0 violations and $0 in total penalties.
How does AT&T's safety record compare to its industry?
AT&T operates in the hydroelectric power generation industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.7. AT&T's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.1.