Establishment profile
AMICK FARMS
7155 BATESBURG HWY, BATSBRG-LEVIL, SC, 29006
Operated by Amick Farms, LLC · 1 of 7 establishments
311615 — Poultry Processing
EIN 760836672
Summary
AMICK FARMS has accumulated 19 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 17 years of recorded history, with $25,260 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 72nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 80 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 75th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 months ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
AMICK FARMS appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
83% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 19 distinct standards shown · 19 citations in this view · $25,260 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 G03IV | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q03IX | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q03II | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $2,975 | Dec 2013 | Dec 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 F08 | 1 | 1 | $2,125 | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $1,700 | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 1 | 1 | $900 | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C03 | 1 | 1 | $900 | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0144 A01III | 1 | 1 | $700 | Dec 2013 | Dec 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 E01 | 1 | 1 | $600 | Jul 2009 | Jul 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 1 | 1 | $360 | Jul 2009 | Jul 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0146 C07 | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2013 | Mar 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 D01II | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q03III | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q03IV | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q06V | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q08 I | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 G01I | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2010 | Oct 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1000 A02 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3116 within SC. Peer group: 80 employers. This establishment has 19 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 93 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AMICK FARMS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2013 | FRACTURE,CAUGHT BY,THUMB,LACERATION,CONVEYOR,HAND | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 6 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 45 violations · $1,398 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Oct 2020 | 1 | 45 | 45 | $1,398 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 45 violations · $1,398 in backwages · 45 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2018 – Oct 2020 | Poultry Processing | FLSA | 45 | 45 | $1,398 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AMICK FARMS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for AMICK FARMS. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AMICK FARMS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMICK FARMS 2079 BATESBURG HIGHWAY · BATESBURG, SC, 29006 | WaterRCRATRI | No Violation Identified | 1 | 0 | — | Jan 2024 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-24 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-06-26 | Accident | 2 | 1 | $3,675 | |
| 2013-01-09 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2010-07-01 | Referral | 11 | 9 | $18,825 | |
| 2009-07-08 | Referral | 2 | 2 | $960 | |
| 2009-06-24 | Complaint | 3 | 2 | $1,800 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
AMICK FARMS is one of 7 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Amick Farms, LLC.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Amick Farms, LLC across all 7 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in poultry processing within SC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS INCNESMITH — 2 federal enforcement records
- COLUMBIA FARMSWEST COLUMBIA — 2 federal enforcement records
- GOLD KIST INC. SC POULTRY DIV.SUMTER — 1 federal enforcement record
- Kraft FoodsNewberry — 1 federal enforcement record
- AMICK FARMS INC.BATESBURG — 1 federal enforcement record
- PILGRIMS PRIDE CORPORATIONSUMTER — 1 federal enforcement record
- GENTRY'S POULTRY CO., INC.WARD — 1 federal enforcement record
- KRAFT FOODS GROUP INCNEWBERRY — 1 federal enforcement record
- TYSON FOODS, INC.COLUMBIA — 1 federal enforcement record
- LOUIS RICHNEWBERRY — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Amick Farms, LLC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- AMICK FARMS, LLCHURLOCK, MD — 2 federal enforcement records
- AMICK FARMS INC.BATESBURG, SC — 1 federal enforcement record
- AMICK FARMS, LLCLAUREL, MS — 0 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All Amick Farms, LLC locationsParent rollup
- Poultry ProcessingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in SCState-wide enforcement data
- Poultry Processing in SCIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AMICK FARMS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Amick Farms, LLC, which operates 7 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is AMICK FARMS's OSHA violation history?
- AMICK FARMS has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 19 violations and $25,260 in total penalties.
- How does AMICK FARMS's safety record compare to its industry?
- AMICK FARMS operates in the poultry processing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. AMICK FARMS's self-reported DART rate is 1.94 compared to an industry average of 1.4.