Establishment profile
AG PROCESSING
500 N COMMERCIAL AVE, EAGLE GROVE, IA, 50533
Operated by Ag Processing.INC
311224 — Soybean and Other Oilseed Processing
Summary
AG PROCESSING has accumulated 14 OSHA violations across 4 inspections over 41 years of recorded history, with $15,550 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 86th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 67 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 71st percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
AG PROCESSING appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 14 distinct standards shown · 14 citations in this view · $15,550 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I | 1 | 1 | $2,250 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $2,250 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $2,250 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 D01 V | 1 | 1 | $1,575 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0179 J04 I | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0254 B04 IV | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0027 D02 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C01 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L | 1 | 1 | $900 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 D01 I | 1 | 1 | $900 | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $650 | Aug 2011 | Aug 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I | 1 | 1 | $650 | Aug 2011 | Aug 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 Q02 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 Q01 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1992 | Aug 1992 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3112 within IA. Peer group: 67 employers. This establishment has 14 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 110 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 1 violation · $0 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | May 2011 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2009 – May 2011 | Farm Product Warehousing and Storage | — | — | 0 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AG PROCESSING. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-15 | Unprogrammed Related | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2011-07-11 | Planned | 2 | 2 | $1,300 | |
| 1992-08-04 | Planned | 12 | 7 | $14,250 | |
| 1985-03-14 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
AG PROCESSING is one of 1 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Ag Processing.INC.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Ag Processing.INC across all 1 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in soybean and other oilseed processing within IA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- AG PROCESSING INCMANNING — 1 federal enforcement record
- AG PROCESSING INCSERGEANT BLUFF — 1 federal enforcement record
- ZFS CRESTON LLCCRESTON — 0 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All Ag Processing.INC locationsParent rollup
- Soybean and Other Oilseed ProcessingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in IAState-wide enforcement data
- Soybean and Other in IAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AG PROCESSING from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Ag Processing.INC.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is AG PROCESSING's OSHA violation history?
- AG PROCESSING has 4 OSHA inspections on record with 14 violations and $15,550 in total penalties.
- How does AG PROCESSING's safety record compare to its industry?
- AG PROCESSING operates in the soybean and other oilseed processing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4. AG PROCESSING's self-reported DART rate is 2.3 compared to an industry average of 2.7.