Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE

2453 CAMINO RAMON, SAN RAMON, CA, 94583
561720 — Janitorial Services

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 14 years
Violations
1
$3,375 in penalties
Penalties
$3,375
$3,375 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 14 years of recorded history, with $3,375 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 34th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 4,950 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 14 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 14 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$3,375
$3,375 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Peer comparison

34th

Below average violations in NAICS 5617 within CA. Peer group: 4,950 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
78th
peer median: $450
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.5
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
14 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 14+ years. Most recent activity: 14 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE, not this location alone

Total cases
106
Unfair labor practice
106

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 100 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
20-CA-303591Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-283459Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-282333Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-256396Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Mar 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-254463Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Mar 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-251522Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-251517Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-251508Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-222293Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-196369Unfair labor practiceApr 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-195688Unfair labor practiceMar 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-195419Unfair labor practiceMar 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-186274Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-177293Unfair labor practiceMay 2016Jun 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-173560Unfair labor practiceApr 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-157760Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-157759Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-153905Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-151214Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Jul 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-147868Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-147726Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-144012Unfair labor practiceJan 2015Feb 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-143666Unfair labor practiceDec 2014Feb 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-143175Unfair labor practiceDec 2014Mar 2015ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-140947Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-140743Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-140563Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-138900Unfair labor practiceOct 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-129971Unfair labor practiceJun 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-128648Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-120984Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Mar 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-113548Unfair labor practiceSep 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-099007Unfair labor practiceFeb 2013Apr 2013ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-097188Unfair labor practiceJan 2013Mar 2013ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-096054Unfair labor practiceJan 2013Jan 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-095820Unfair labor practiceJan 2013Mar 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-094490Unfair labor practiceDec 2012Mar 2013ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-091427Unfair labor practiceOct 2012Nov 2012ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-087355Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Oct 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-085088Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Sep 2012ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-084732Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Sep 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-083005Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-082790Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-081196Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Jun 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-081188Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-081184Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-079803Unfair labor practiceApr 2012May 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-074481Unfair labor practiceFeb 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-074180Unfair labor practiceFeb 2012Apr 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-072176Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Feb 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-071282Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Mar 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-071226Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-069507Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-068672Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-067090Unfair labor practiceOct 2011Apr 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-065706Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-065705Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-064777Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Mar 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-030317Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039893Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-035636Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Jun 2012ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-030205Unfair labor practiceMay 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-035510Unfair labor practiceApr 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-030149Unfair labor practiceMar 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-030120Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011Apr 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-025361Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-025360Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-029834Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Aug 2010ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-029795Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Aug 2010ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-025067Unfair labor practiceApr 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-034890Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034889Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034876Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-039150Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Apr 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039146Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-034760Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-039087Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-034668Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Mar 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034663Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Nov 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034593Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Oct 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-029340Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Sep 2009ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-034549Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-029297Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-034512Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Aug 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034249Unfair labor practiceJan 2009Apr 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033980Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Aug 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-028785Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-023921Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-023918Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-023916Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-023914Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-033911Unfair labor practiceApr 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033872Unfair labor practiceApr 2008May 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033845Unfair labor practiceMar 2008May 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033825Unfair labor practiceFeb 2008Mar 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033644Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Dec 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033314Unfair labor practiceFeb 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033278Unfair labor practiceFeb 2007Apr 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032994Unfair labor practiceMay 2006Jan 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032936Unfair labor practiceMar 2006Oct 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2011-08-12Complaint11$3,375

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in janitorial services within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE's OSHA violation history?
ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $3,375 in total penalties.
How does ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE's safety record compare to its industry?
ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE operates in the janitorial services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.5.