Skip to main content

Establishment profile

YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

82 MECHANIC STREET, PAWCATUCK, CT, 06379
335911Storage Battery Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
17
over 35 years
Violations
233
$135,548 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
4 National Emphasis Program inspections · 4 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. has accumulated 233 OSHA violations across 17 inspections over 35 years of recorded history, with $135,548 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 49 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
17
0.5 / yr · last 35 yrs
Violations
233
6.7 / yr
Penalties
$135,548
$582 avg / violation
79% serious21% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
7 of 17
Inspection trigger · referral
4 of 17

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 15 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 47 citations in this view · $40,980 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1027 C33$4,722Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.1027 M04 II33$3,192Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.0151 C33$2,700Oct 1991Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0133$2,140Dec 1994Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.1025 D0233$1,340Oct 1993Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I33$1,195Oct 1991Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.1027 F01 I33Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.1027 K0122$3,462Dec 2002Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.0141 A03 I22$3,065Dec 2002Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0122$2,700Oct 1991Aug 2012
29 CFR 1910.1025 L01 I22$2,025Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.1027 I0122$1,862Nov 1995Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.1027 J03 I22$1,862Nov 1995Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II22$1,835Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0122$1,640Dec 1994Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.0134 H02 I22$1,600Dec 2002Oct 2004
29 CFR 1910.0219 F0322$1,565Oct 1991Dec 2002
29 CFR 1910.0134 E0122$1,545Dec 2002Oct 2008
29 CFR 1910.0217 B03 II22$1,265Dec 2002Sep 2010
29 CFR 1910.0217 B03 I22$1,265Dec 2002Sep 2010

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3359 within CT. Peer group: 49 employers. This establishment has 233 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
98th
peer median: $2,743
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Complaint
7
Referral
4
Follow-up
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
13 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CT — for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC., not this location alone

Total cases
1
Unfair labor practice
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
34-CA-006530Unfair labor practiceMar 1994Oct 2002ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
82 MECHANIC STREET · PAWCATUCK, CT, 06379
AirWaterRCRANo Violation Identified00Mar 2011View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$0
Obligated (all-time)
$28.8M
Awards
95
Top agency
Department of Defense
$27.1M
Company-wide — ENER-TEK INTERNATIONAL INC (across 2 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$0
Obligated (all-time)
$37.8M
Awards (all-time)
109

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of Defense$27.1M
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$1.7M
Largest awards (top 50 of 95)
  • Department of Defense
    SILVER-ZINC BATTERY CELLS - NO FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED- MOD 1
    contract · Last action 2016-06-21
    $3,881,208
  • Department of Defense
    HALF STRING WITH SPARES AND TEST CELLS
    contract · Last action 2013-10-02
    $3,373,333
  • Department of Defense
    LITHIUM ION BATTERY
    contract · Last action 2014-06-24
    $2,404,672
  • Department of Defense
    SILVER ZINC BATTERY CELLS AND ELECTROLYTE FILL KITS
    contract · Last action 2010-11-15
    $2,191,578
  • Department of Defense
    BATTERY,NONRECHARGE
    contract · Last action 2010-09-23
    $1,750,870
  • Department of Defense
    B2
    contract · Last action 2013-05-23
    $1,104,406
  • Department of Defense
    TAS::97 0401::TAS ADVANCED MATERIALS & CHEMISTRIES FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES ARRA::YES::ARRA
    contract · Last action 2012-02-21
    $749,999
  • Department of Defense
    ADVANCED LITHIUM ION BATTERIES FOR SPACE-BASED APPLICATIONS
    contract · Last action 2011-11-29
    $749,437
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC
    contract · Last action 2014-04-09
    $749,105
  • Department of Defense
    PROPULSION FOR MINIATURE MUNITIONS: RADICALLY DESIGNED HIGH ENERGY METAL-AIR CELL FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
    contract · Last action 2011-08-31
    $748,502
  • Department of Defense
    R&D SBIR TOPIC N08-017
    contract · Last action 2012-09-27
    $748,455
  • Department of Defense
    YARDNEY
    contract · Last action 2011-12-22
    $746,405
  • Department of Defense
    LITHIUM ION BATTERY AND ULTRACAPACITORS HYBRID FOR SATELLITE POWER
    contract · Last action 2014-02-19
    $731,794
  • Department of Defense
    BASICTOPIC N101-054
    contract · Last action 2015-03-26
    $730,464
  • Department of Defense
    LI-ION BATTERY CHEMISTRY
    contract · Last action 2011-12-20
    $728,758
  • Department of Defense
    STORAGE BATTERIES
    contract · Last action 2011-05-13
    $694,800
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    LITHIUM-ION (LI-ION) BATTERIES ARE ATTRACTIVE CANDIDATES FOR USE AS POWER SOURCES IN AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS BECAUSE THEY HAVE HIGH SPECIFIC ENERGY, ENERGY DENSITY AND LONG CYCLE LIFE. HOWEVER, CONVENTIONAL LI-ION BATTERIES EXPERIENCE LOSS OF CAPACITY AND INCREASED IMPEDANCE AND POOR CYCLE LIFE WHEN THEY ARE CHARGED/DISCHARGED AT HIGH RATES OVER C-RATE. THESE PROBLEMS ARE MAGNIFIED AT LOW TEMPERATURE OPERATION. THE LIMITATIONS IN THE HIGH RATE CAPABILITY OF LI-ION BATTERIES ARE MAINLY CAUSED BY SLOW SOLID-STATE DIFFUSION OF LI+ WITHIN THE ELECTRODE MATERIALS YARDNEY/LITHION INC., THE WORLD LEADER IN CUTTING EDGE LI-ION BATTERY TECHNOLOGY PROPOSES TO INVESTIGATE NEW NON-TOXIC NANO-ENGINEERED ELECTRODES THAT SIGNIFICANTLY SHORTENS THE LI+ DIFFUSION LENGTH WITHIN THE ELECTRODE MATERIALS AND INCREASES THE RATE CAPABILITY OF LI-ION BATTERIES. THE GOAL OF THIS PHASE II PROJECT IS TO MANUFACTURE RAPID RECHARGE LI-ION BATTERY FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATION. YARDNEY WILL MANUFACTURE 5 PROTOTYPE CELLS CAPABLE OF RECHARGE AT LESS THAN 15 MIN AT ROOM TEMPERATURE. DURING THE PHASE I WE FOUND THAT THE NANOENGINEERED ANODE SHOWED EXCELLENT RATE CAPABILITIES COMPARED TO PLANAR ELECTRODE. NANOARCHITECTURED CURRENT COLLECTOR PROVIDES HIGHER SAFETY DUE TO LARGE SURFACE AREA CONTACT WITH THE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND THAT ACTS AS HEAT SINK IN HIGH RATE APPLICATIONS AND ALSO LOWER IMPEDANCE. HIGH POWER APPLICATIONS INCLUDE POWER TOOLS, ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS. AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL SECTORS, WHERE THE SLIM, SMALL-SIZED BATTERY WILL DELIVER LARGE AMOUNTS OF ENERGY WHILE REQUIRING ONLY A MINUTE TO RECHARGE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE BATTERY'S ADVANTAGES IN SIZE, WEIGHT AND SAFETY HIGHLY SUIT IT FOR A ROLE AS AN ALTERNATIVE POWER SOURCE FOR HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES.
    contract · Last action 2014-06-27
    $597,892
  • Department of Defense
    BATTERY MODULES
    contract · Last action 2012-04-04
    $554,890
  • Department of Defense
    OTHER AIRCRAFT PART AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING
    contract · Last action 2012-06-26
    $473,017
  • Department of Defense
    BATTERY ELECTRONICS TEST SET (BETS)
    contract · Last action 2016-05-05
    $427,233
  • Department of Defense
    BATTERIES
    contract · Last action 2010-04-09
    $375,000
  • Department of Defense
    PHASE II SBIR-LITHIUM ION HYBRID BATTERY
    contract · Last action 2010-09-30
    $362,742
  • Department of Defense
    ASDS BATTERY UPGRADE
    contract · Last action 2009-07-01
    $313,642
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    SAP PURCHASE REQUISITION: 4200356908
    contract · Last action 2012-02-28
    $309,924
  • Department of Defense
    4509707116!BATTERY POWER SOURC
    contract · Last action 2009-01-20
    $267,679
  • Department of Defense
    REA SETTLEMENT
    contract · Last action 2013-10-02
    $177,107
  • Department of Defense
    BATTERY POWER SUPPL
    contract · Last action 2010-07-22
    $170,958
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    THE GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP NOVEL ELECTROLYTES OR ELECTROLYTE/ADDITIVE COMBINATIONS THAT RESULT IN FLAME RETARDANT, ELECTROCHEMICALLY STABLE ELECTROLYTES FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERIES. THIS PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP ELECTROLYTES WITH REDUCED FLAMMABILITY AND IMPROVED ELECTROCHEMICAL STABILITY FOR NASA APPLICATIONS. THE CREATED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS WILL BE TESTED IN SMALL (COIN AND POUCH) AND IN TRUE PRISMATIC 7 OR 10AH CELLS WITH THE DIFFERENT CATHODE MATERIALS AND. STATE-OF THE-ART CELLS WILL BE MODIFIED SO THAT THE CELLS PERFORM COMPARABLE TO THE AEROSPACE CELLS IN TERMS OF RATE CAPABILITY AND IRREVERSIBLE CAPACITY. THE BATTERY CELL MUST DISPLAY THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS: I) SPECIFIC ENERGY VALUES >1100 WH/KG, II) IMPROVED THERMAL STABILITY COMPARED TO THE CONVENTIONAL LITHIATED COBALT OXIDE OR NICKEL COBALT OXIDE SYSTEMS, III) HIGH LITHIUM DIFFUSIVITY COMPARED TO LITHIATED COBALT OXIDE OR NICKEL COBALT OXIDE SYSTEMS (10-10 CM2/S), TO SUPPORT DISCHARGE RATES OF C/5 OR HIGHER (WITH MINIMAL DERATING IN THE SPECIFIC ENERGY OVER A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF -10OC TO +40OC), IV) GOOD CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL STABILITY COMBINED WITH GOOD REVERSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ~ 80% OF THE INITIAL CAPACITY AFTER 2000 CYCLES AT 100% DOD AT C/2 FOR THE HIGH ENERGY CELL AND 80% OF THE INITIAL CAPACITY AFTER 200 CYCLES AT 100% DOD AT C/10 FOR THE ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY CELL (SEE TABLE 1). V) OVERALL SAFETY, IN TERMS OF TOLERANCE TO OVERCHARGE AND TO EXPOSURE TO HIGH TEMPERATURES, COMPARABLE OR SUPERIOR TO THE CONVENTIONAL LITHIATED COBALT OXIDE OR NICKEL COBALT OXIDE SYSTEMS AND VI) LOW TOXICITY, ONCE AGAIN COMPARABLE OR BETTER THAN THE CONVENTIONAL LITHIATED COBALT OXIDE OR NICKEL COBALT OXIDE SYSTEMS.
    contract · Last action 2010-05-17
    $149,927
  • Department of Defense
    STATUS REPORT
    contract · Last action 2011-09-23
    $149,707
  • Department of Defense
    SBIR PHASE I TOPIC N08-017
    contract · Last action 2009-06-25
    $149,309
  • Department of Defense
    4523546430!PRODUCE PV
    contract · Last action 2013-01-29
    $148,500
  • Department of Defense
    SILVER ZINC BATTERY
    contract · Last action 2011-01-19
    $142,450
  • Department of Defense
    199805!1700!1881!JA113!NAVAL INVENTORY CONTROL POINT !N0010498CLA13 !A!*!* !19980213!20020228!617158712!617158712!808171979!N!87362!YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, IN!82 MECHANIC ST !PAWCATUCK !CT!06379!59140!011!09!PAWCATUCK !NEW LONDON !CONN !0001!+000002301000!N!N!000000000000!6135!BATTERIES, NONRECHARGEABLE !A3 !SHIPS !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !3692!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !U!J!2!002!B!* !A!N!A!* !* !N!B!*!A!*!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!
    contract · Last action 2011-08-22
    $134,490
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    SAP PURCHASE REQUISITION: 4200357585
    contract · Last action 2012-01-21
    $103,308
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    THIS PROJECT WILL INVESTIGATE AN ENTIRELY NEW BATTERY CHEMISTRY BY DEVELOPING A MARTIAN AIR BATTERY. SPECIFICALLY THE PROJECT WILL EXPLORE THE CONCEPT OF A MARTIAN BATTERY THAT UTILIZES IN-SITU RESOURCES TO PRODUCE ENERGY FOR NASA APPLICATIONS. OUR EXPERIENCE PRODUCING HIGH-ENERGY AIR CATHODES FOR OUR WORK WITH EXISTING METAL-AIR SYSTEMS WILL BE UTILIZED DURING THIS PROGRAM. OUR ESTABLISHED AIR CATHODES WILL BE MODIFIED, TO ACCOMMODATE A MARTIAN ENVIRONMENT, AND INCORPORATED INTO CELLS. SEVERAL DIFFERENT CHEMICALLY COMPOSED CATHODES WILL BE INVESTIGATED. THE ANTICIPATED RESULT OF THE PHASE 1 PROJECT IS A NEW BATTERY. ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED MARTIAN BATTERY INCLUDE A LIGHT WEIGHT SOURCE FOR IN-SITU ENERGY PRODUCTION. IN ADDITION THE CONCEPTUAL BATTERY WILL BE CAPABLE OF ATMOSPHERIC GAS COLLECTION AND SEPARATION.
    contract · Last action 2011-07-26
    $99,785
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    THIS PROJECT WILL ADVANCE AN EFFICIENT AND LIGHTWEIGHT ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE FOR OXYGEN CONCENTRATORS BY DEVELOPING A HIGH SPECIFIC ENERGY LITHIUM-AIR CELL. SPECIFICALLY THE PROJECT ADVANCES HIGH SPECIFIC ENERGY CELLS BY FOCUSING ON THE CATALYSTS IN THE CATHODE AND ANODE PROTECTION OF OUR EXISTING CELLS UNDER VARIOUS OXYGEN ATMOSPHERES FOR NASA APPLICATIONS. OUR HIGH-ENERGY AIR CATHODES WILL BE IMPROVED UPON AND INCORPORATED INTO THE CELL DESIGNS. SEVERAL DIFFERENT CHEMICALLY COMPOSED AIR CATHODES WILL BE INVESTIGATED. LITHIUM-AIR CELLS PRODUCE POWER BY THE LITHIUM REACTING WITH THE OXYGEN IN THE CATHODE. THE ANTICIPATED RESULT OF THE PHASE 1 PROJECT IS A BENCH TOP OPERATIONAL CELL (TRL4). ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED LITHIUM-AIR CELL INCLUDE A HIGH ENERGY DENSITY, SAFE AND LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN, AND A HIGH ENERGY DENSITY CATHODE.
    contract · Last action 2011-09-28
    $99,726
  • Department of Defense
    PH I RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT
    contract · Last action 2012-01-31
    $99,710
  • Department of Defense
    TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT -
    contract · Last action 2013-04-12
    $99,671
  • Department of Defense
    SBIR I - OSD08-EP3 - FOIL BEARING SUPPORTED CENTRIFUGAL
    contract · Last action 2008-05-21
    $99,641
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS PROPOSAL IS TO DEVELOP A HYBRID BATTERY-ULTRA CAPACITOR STORAGE SYSTEM THAT POWERS HUMAN-ROBOTIC SYSTEMS IN SPACE MISSIONS. SPACE MISSIONS INVOLVING HUMAN-ROBOTIC SYSTEMS UTILIZING BATTERY BASED ELECTRICAL POWER OFTEN UNDERGO NUMEROUS OPERATIONS WITHIN EACH COMPLETE CYCLE. DURING PHASE I OF THIS PROGRAM YARDNEY IN COLLABORATION WITH MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES PROPOSE TO DEVELOP A HYBRID SYSTEM CONSISTING OF A HIGH ENERGY LI-ION BATTERY, HIGH POWER ULTRACAPACITOR (UCAP) AND THE ELECTRONIC INTERFACE CONTROL MODULE. THE HYBRID SYSTEM TO BE DEVELOPED IN THIS PROGRAM WILL PROVIDE ELECTRICAL ENERGY TO HUMAN-ROBOTIC SYSTEMS FOR ADVANCED NEXT GENERATION SPACE MISSIONS.
    contract · Last action 2011-07-27
    $99,630
  • Department of Defense
    LITHIUM ION BATTERY AND ULTRACAPACITORS HYBRID FOR SATELLITE POWER
    contract · Last action 2010-03-02
    $99,618
  • Department of Defense
    SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT PHASE I FOR RESERACH ON SAFE HIGH RATE AND ULTRA HIGH CAPACITY MINIMUM 4.0 AMP HOUR 18650 LITHIUM ION RECHARGEABLE CELL.
    contract · Last action 2012-02-23
    $99,558
  • Department of Defense
    FIRST STATUS REPORT
    contract · Last action 2011-03-01
    $99,555
  • Department of Defense
    PHASE I SBIR TO YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. FOR TOPIC # A11-065, TITLED "LITHIUM ION BATTERY SEPERATOR DEVELOPMENT"
    contract · Last action 2011-10-12
    $99,485
  • Department of Defense
    PH I RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT
    contract · Last action 2011-09-21
    $99,378
  • Department of Defense
    SBIR I - ADVANCED LITHIUM ION BATTERIES FOR SPACE-BASED APPL
    contract · Last action 2009-02-19
    $99,019
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    LITHIUM-ION (LI-ION) BATTERIES ARE ATTRACTIVE CANDIDATES FOR USE AS POWER SOURCES IN AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS BECAUSE THEY HAVE HIGH SPECIFIC ENERGY (UP TO 200 WH/KG), ENERGY DENSITY (~ 500 WH/L) AND LONG CYCLE LIFE (1,000 - 30,000 CYCLES DEPENDING ON THE DEPTH OF CYCLING). YARDNEY/LITHION, INC. THE LEADER IN CUTTING EDGE LI-ION BATTERIES IS DEDICATED IN RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN AND MANUFACTURER OF HIGH PERFORMING BATTERY SYSTEMS FOR AEROSPACE, LAND AND SEA APPLICATIONS. AT THE PRESENT MOMENT, TWO OF THE LITHION BATTERIES ARE OPERATING ON THE SURFACE OF MARS WITH GREAT SUCCESS. FUTURE ROBOTIC AND HUMAN EXPLORATION MISSIONS REQUIRE ADVANCED HUMAN-RATED ENERGY RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES LEVEL METRICS SHOULD HAVE SPECIFIC ENERGY OF 300 WH/KG AT C/2 DISCHARGE RATE AND 0OC, AND ENERGY DENSITY GREATER THAN 500 WH/L, WITH A CALENDAR LIFE OF 5 YEARS. THE CYCLE LIFE OF THE CELL IS REQUIRED AT 100% DEPTH OF DISCHARGE (DOD) IN THE RANGE OF 250 CYCLES. YARDNEY PROPOSES TO DEVELOP ENVIRONMENTALLY BENIGN NEW ELECTRODE COMPONENTS AND CELL CHEMISTRIES BASED ON HIGH CAPACITY OF 300MAH/G LAYERED LI2MNO3 DERIVATIVE CATHODE, COMPOSITE SILICON BASED ANODE WITH A CAPACITY OF OVER 600 MAH/G AND SUITABLE ELECTROLYTE.
    contract · Last action 2009-01-13
    $99,019
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    HIGH CAPACITY NANO-COMPOSITE CATHODES FOR HUMAN-RELATED LITHIUM BATTERIES
    contract · Last action 2008-02-27
    $98,993
  • Department of Defense
    RESEARCH
    contract · Last action 2007-12-07
    $98,865
  • Department of Defense
    SBIR PHASE I
    contract · Last action 2008-01-11
    $94,990

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 335912 - PRIMARY BATTERY MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2016-06-21. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2012-07-30Referral1$2,700
2010-07-28Complaint11$550
2010-07-26Complaint1413$13,900
2008-09-29Referral22$2,000
2006-01-13Referral1211$6,000
2005-07-27Complaint11$813
2004-04-12Complaint66$3,200
2004-04-12Follow-up188$13,360
2004-01-29Complaint1212$6,000
2002-06-19Planned3938$14,850
2002-06-06Planned6657$40,150
1997-09-05Follow-up2$800
1995-06-08Complaint134$4,000
1994-11-16Referral11$600
1994-07-12Follow-up2118$19,000
1993-06-15Follow-up73$3,000
1991-07-09Complaint179$4,625

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in storage battery manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. has 17 OSHA inspections on record with 233 violations and $135,547.5 in total penalties.
How does YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC. operates in the storage battery manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.8.