Skip to main content

Establishment profile

WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.

800 HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, 05403
236220Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
8
over 39 years
Violations
8
$4,113 in penalties
Penalties
$4,113
$514 avg
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 2 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC. has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 8 inspections over 39 years of recorded history, with $4,113 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 94th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 625 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 98th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 10 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
8
0.2 / yr · last 39 yrs
Violations
8
0.2 / yr
Penalties
$4,113
$514 avg / violation
13% serious87% other
Inspection trigger · planned
5 of 8
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 8

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 7 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $4,113 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1926.0020 B0122$875Jan 1987Sep 1996
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0211$1,488Jun 2016Jun 2016
29 CFR 1926.0602 C01 VI11$875Jul 2015Jul 2015
29 CFR 1926.0021 B0211$875Sep 1996Sep 1996
29 CFR 1910.0134 D01 III11Jun 2016Jun 2016
29 CFR 1910.0134 A0111Jun 2016Jun 2016
29 CFR 1926.0400 H0111Jan 1987Jan 1987

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

94th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 2362 within VT. Peer group: 625 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
91st
peer median: $300
Inspection frequency
98th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.2
TRIR
5.7
vs industry
+3.8

Reported for 39 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
5.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
5
Complaint
1
Referral
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
10 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 10+ years. Most recent activity: 10 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
2461559
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$1.5M
Obligated (all-time)
$4.8M
Awards
12
Top agency
Department of Defense
$4.8M

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 236220 - COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. Last action: 2024-03-27. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2016-02-11Unprogrammed Related31$1,488
2015-02-27Referral1$875
2011-09-30Complaint0$0
2010-08-26Programmed Related0$0
1997-10-31Planned0$0
1996-09-03Planned2$1,750
1988-07-14Programmed Related0$0
1987-01-06Planned2$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in commercial and institutional building construction within VT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.'s OSHA violation history?
WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC. has 8 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $4,112.5 in total penalties.
How does WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC. operates in the commercial and institutional building construction industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.9. WRIGHT & MORRISSEY INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.2.