Skip to main content

Establishment profile

WEST FRASER, INC.

401 CHAMPION DR., MC DAVID, FL, 32568
Operated by West Fraser · 1 of 6 establishments
321113Sawmills
EIN 721489951

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 10 years
Violations
3
$14,045 in penalties
Penalties
$14,045
$4,682 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 hospitalizations · 4 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

WEST FRASER, INC. has accumulated 3 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 10 years of recorded history, with $14,045 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 55th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 67 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 82nd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 months ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

WEST FRASER, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.5 / yr · last 10 yrs
Violations
3
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$14,045
$4,682 avg / violation
33% serious67% other
Inspection trigger · referral
4 of 5
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 5

60% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 3 distinct standards shown · 3 citations in this view · $14,045 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II B11$9,045Aug 2025Aug 2025
5A000111$5,000Mar 2021Mar 2021
29 CFR 1904.0039 A0211Feb 2016Feb 2016

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

55th

Above average violations in NAICS 3211 within FL. Peer group: 67 employers. This establishment has 3 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
79th
peer median: $2,780
Inspection frequency
82nd
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.6
vs industry
−2.2
TRIR
1.8
vs industry
−2.4

Reported for 140 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
1.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Referral
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Dec 2015 – Jun 2025 · 2 in last 5 years

Reports
4
Hospitalizations
3
Amputations
3
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 17, 2025Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testingOther finger(s) n.e.c.Amputation
Oct 2, 2020Pedestrian vehicular incident, n.e.c.Lower leg(s)Amputation
Jul 25, 2017Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetWrist(s)Hospitalized
Dec 7, 2015Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationFingertip(s)Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Oct 2, 2020Amputated,Amputation,Cart,Caught Between,Crushed,Driver,Driving,Forklift,Front End Loader,Industrial Truck,Kiln,Knee,Leg,Lumber,Material Handling,Metal,Motor Vehicle,PIV,Partial Amputation,Pinned,Powered Industrial Vehicle,Sawmill,Surgical Amputation,Unsafe Position11
Jul 25, 2017Fall,Fracture,Guardrail,Ladder,Wrist11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 11 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for WEST FRASER, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WEST FRASER, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in FL — for West Fraser, not this location alone

Total cases
21
Unfair labor practice
19
Representation (union)
2

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other West Fraser locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 21 cases · 19 ULP · 2 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
12-CA-317871Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-317864Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Apr 2025ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RD-243552Representation electionJun 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-237873Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-235351Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-235114Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-230186Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Apr 2020ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-228967Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Nov 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-228809Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Mar 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-228438Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Apr 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-225732Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-225675Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RD-208494Representation electionOct 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-065414Unfair labor practiceSep 2011May 2012ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-026633Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Aug 2015ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-026528Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Nov 2009ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-026472Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-026090Unfair labor practiceNov 2008Jul 2009ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-026058Unfair labor practiceOct 2008Aug 2009ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-025600Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Oct 2008ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-025599Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Oct 2008ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WEST FRASER, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WEST FRASER, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for WEST FRASER, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-06-26Referral1$9,045
2020-10-07Referral11$5,000
2019-11-19Planned0$0
2017-08-01Referral0$0
2015-12-15Referral1$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

WEST FRASER, INC. is one of 6 establishments rolled up under the parent organization West Fraser.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of West Fraser across all 6 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in sawmills within FL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by West Fraser, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WEST FRASER, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup West Fraser, which operates 6 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is WEST FRASER, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
WEST FRASER, INC. has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 3 violations and $14,045 in total penalties.
How does WEST FRASER, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
WEST FRASER, INC. operates in the sawmills industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.2. WEST FRASER, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.58 compared to an industry average of 2.8.