Establishment profile
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.
5738 ROUTE 9, NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224
Operated by Viking Yacht Company · 1 of 2 establishments
336612 — Boat Building
Summary
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. has accumulated 103 OSHA violations across 22 inspections over 51 years of recorded history, with $104,080 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 21 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
55% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 41 citations in this view · $83,880 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 5 | 4 | $100 | Mar 1975 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 3 | 3 | $1,440 | Jul 1984 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E01 I | 3 | 2 | — | Mar 1982 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 IVA | 2 | 2 | $2,340 | Jan 1989 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F04 | 2 | 2 | $1,740 | Jan 1989 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 B09 | 2 | 2 | $1,200 | Jul 1984 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0213 D01 | 2 | 2 | $380 | Jul 1984 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 L01 | 2 | 2 | $320 | Jun 1982 | Mar 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 C06 | 2 | 2 | $240 | Jul 1984 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 2 | 2 | $190 | Mar 1975 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 B | 2 | 2 | $165 | Mar 1975 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0213 C01 | 2 | 2 | $145 | Mar 1975 | Oct 1982 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0002 A | 2 | 2 | $45 | Jul 1984 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I | 2 | 2 | — | Jan 1989 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 V | 2 | 2 | — | Jul 1984 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 2 | 2 | — | Mar 1975 | Jan 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $63,375 | Apr 2018 | Apr 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1915.0152 A | 1 | 1 | $4,100 | Aug 2004 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1915.0073 D | 1 | 1 | $4,050 | Aug 2004 | Aug 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0029 A03 I | 1 | 1 | $4,050 | Aug 2004 | Aug 2004 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3366 within NJ. Peer group: 21 employers. This establishment has 103 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 75 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2017
Most frequent event: Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2017 | Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment | Finger(s), fingernail(s), unspecified | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2017 | Amputated,Blade,Finger,Machine Guarding,Struck Against,Table Saw,Unguarded | 1 | 1 | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | HANDRAIL,FALL,FALL PROTECTION,BOATFatality | 1 | — | 1 |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 1 violation · $44,010 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-1B visa wage protections | May 2006 | 1 | 1 | 1 | $44,010 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · 1 violations · $44,010 in backwages · 2 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2005 – May 2006 | Boat Building | H-1B | 1 | 1 | $44,010 | — |
| Jan 2005 – May 2005 | Boat Building | — | — | 1 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
Office of Foreign Labor Certification — labor condition applications for H-1B, H-2A, H-2B visa programs. Wage ratio = offered / prevailing wage. Historical data only: DOL ended OFLC Performance Data Disclosure publication in 2026, so the figures above reflect filings through the last ingested cycle and are not being refreshed. Treat as a historical snapshot, not a current signal.
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities · $7,600 in assessed penalties.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIKING YACHT CO RTE. 9 & THE BASS RIVER · NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224 | AirWaterRCRATRI | Violation Identified QNCR 12 | 11 | 1 | $7,600 | Nov 2025 | View → |
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. 5738 ROUTE 9 · NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224 | Water | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2017-11-06 | Referral | 1 | — | $63,375 | |
| 2013-10-21 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2007-05-10 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-04-26 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-03-29 | Accident | 32 | 23 | $30,500 | |
| 2002-02-21 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2001-05-09 | Complaint | 3 | 3 | $2,700 | |
| 1993-01-12 | Planned | 4 | 4 | $2,020 | |
| 1989-05-11 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1989-02-28 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1988-11-10 | Referral | 3 | 3 | $960 | |
| 1988-11-02 | Planned | 31 | 23 | $4,050 | |
| 1984-07-26 | Planned | 9 | 1 | $140 | |
| 1982-04-05 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-03-17 | Planned | 5 | 3 | $165 | |
| 1982-03-03 | Planned | 4 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-01-14 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1979-09-28 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1979-07-10 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-06-29 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1975-03-04 | Planned | 9 | — | $170 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Viking Yacht Company.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Viking Yacht Company across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in boat building within NJ, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SILVERTON MARINE CORP.MILLVILLE — 2 federal enforcement records
- RELEASE BW, INC.EGG HARBOR CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.EGG HARBOR CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- OCEAN YACHTS INC.EGG HARBOR CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- POST MARINE COMPANY INC.MAYS LANDING — 1 federal enforcement record
- DUKE SPORTFISHING YACHTS, INC.ROSENHAYN — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Viking Yacht Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.EGG HARBOR CITY, NJ — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Viking Yacht Company locationsParent rollup
- Boat BuildingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in NJState-wide enforcement data
- Boat Building in NJIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Viking Yacht Company, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. has 22 OSHA inspections on record with 103 violations and $104,080 in total penalties.
- How does VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. operates in the boat building industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.4.
- Has VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC..