Skip to main content

Establishment profile

VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.

5738 ROUTE 9, NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224
Operated by Viking Yacht Company · 1 of 2 establishments
336612Boat Building

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
22
over 51 years
Violations
103
$104,080 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 fatality · 1 hospitalizations · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. has accumulated 103 OSHA violations across 22 inspections over 51 years of recorded history, with $104,080 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 21 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
22
0.4 / yr · last 51 yrs
Violations
103
2.0 / yr
Penalties
$104,080
$1,010 avg / violation
58% serious42% other
Inspection trigger · planned
8 of 22
Inspection trigger · complaint
6 of 22

55% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 41 citations in this view · $83,880 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0154$100Mar 1975Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0133$1,440Jul 1984Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0219 E01 I32Mar 1982Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 IVA22$2,340Jan 1989Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0304 F0422$1,740Jan 1989Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0107 B0922$1,200Jul 1984Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0213 D0122$380Jul 1984Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0095 L0122$320Jun 1982Mar 1989
29 CFR 1910.0107 C0622$240Jul 1984Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0122$190Mar 1975Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0212 B22$165Mar 1975Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0213 C0122$145Mar 1975Oct 1982
29 CFR 1904.0002 A22$45Jul 1984Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I22Jan 1989Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 V22Jul 1984Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0215 A0422Mar 1975Jan 1989
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$63,375Apr 2018Apr 2018
29 CFR 1915.0152 A11$4,100Aug 2004Aug 2004
29 CFR 1915.0073 D11$4,050Aug 2004Aug 2004
29 CFR 1910.0029 A03 I11$4,050Aug 2004Aug 2004

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3366 within NJ. Peer group: 21 employers. This establishment has 103 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
100th
peer median: $5,600
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.4
TRIR
2.4
vs industry
−0.5

Reported for 75 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
8
Complaint
6
Accident
1
Referral
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2017

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
0
Amputations
1
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Oct 30, 2017Struck against moving part of machinery or equipmentFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedAmputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Oct 30, 2017Amputated,Blade,Finger,Machine Guarding,Struck Against,Table Saw,Unguarded11
Mar 29, 2004HANDRAIL,FALL,FALL PROTECTION,BOATFatality11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
2
Back wages owed
$44,010
Employees affected
2

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 1 violation · $44,010 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
H-1B visa wage protectionsMay 2006111$44,010

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · 1 violations · $44,010 in backwages · 2 workers affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
May 2005 – May 2006Boat BuildingH-1B11$44,010
Jan 2005 – May 2005Boat Building1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

Total applications
1
Certified
1
Avg wage ratio
1.00x
H-1B

Office of Foreign Labor Certification — labor condition applications for H-1B, H-2A, H-2B visa programs. Wage ratio = offered / prevailing wage. Historical data only: DOL ended OFLC Performance Data Disclosure publication in 2026, so the figures above reflect filings through the last ingested cycle and are not being refreshed. Treat as a historical snapshot, not a current signal.

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
11
Quarters non-compliant
12
Formal actions
1
EPA penalties
$7,600

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities · $7,600 in assessed penalties.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
VIKING YACHT CO
RTE. 9 & THE BASS RIVER · NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224
AirWaterRCRATRIViolation Identified
QNCR 12
111$7,600Nov 2025View →
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.
5738 ROUTE 9 · NEW GRETNA, NJ, 08224
WaterNo Violation Identified00View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
3337699
Operation
C

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2018-12-12Complaint0$0
2017-11-06Referral1$63,375
2013-10-21Complaint1$0
2007-05-10Complaint0$0
2004-04-26Referral0$0
2004-03-29Accident3223$30,500
2002-02-21Referral0$0
2001-05-09Complaint33$2,700
1993-01-12Planned44$2,020
1989-05-11Complaint0$0
1989-02-28Follow-up0$0
1988-11-10Referral33$960
1988-11-02Planned3123$4,050
1984-07-26Planned91$140
1982-04-05Follow-up0$0
1982-03-17Planned53$165
1982-03-03Planned4$0
1982-01-14Planned0$0
1979-09-28Planned0$0
1979-07-10Complaint1$0
1977-06-29Follow-up0$0
1975-03-04Planned9$170

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Viking Yacht Company.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Viking Yacht Company across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in boat building within NJ, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Viking Yacht Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Viking Yacht Company, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. has 22 OSHA inspections on record with 103 violations and $104,080 in total penalties.
How does VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. operates in the boat building industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.4.
Has VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving VIKING YACHT COMPANY, INC..