Establishment profile
URETEK LLC
30 LENOX STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT, 06513
313320 — Fabric Coating Mills
Summary
URETEK LLC has accumulated 112 OSHA violations across 17 inspections over 47 years of recorded history, with $130,113 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 93rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 16 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
URETEK LLC appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
76% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 10 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 39 citations in this view · $108,823 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 6 | 6 | $8,070 | Feb 1979 | May 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 3 | 3 | $1,173 | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 3 | 3 | $450 | Feb 1979 | Aug 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 2 | 2 | $1,925 | Sep 1999 | Sep 2008 |
| 5A0001 | 2 | 2 | $1,085 | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 B01 | 2 | 2 | $690 | Jul 1989 | Aug 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E03 I | 2 | 2 | $400 | Jul 1989 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 2 | 2 | $230 | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 Q01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III | 2 | 2 | — | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jul 1987 | Sep 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jul 1987 | Aug 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E06 I | 2 | 2 | — | Feb 1979 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 A | 1 | 1 | $60,000 | Jul 1987 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0141 G02 | 1 | 1 | $6,500 | Jul 1987 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H02 II | 1 | 1 | $6,500 | Jul 1987 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0141 G04 | 1 | 1 | $6,500 | Jul 1987 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F04 I | 1 | 1 | $6,500 | Jul 1987 | Jul 1987 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q03 III | 1 | 1 | $5,400 | Jul 2013 | Jul 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q06 II | 1 | 1 | $3,400 | Jul 2013 | Jul 2013 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3133 within CT. Peer group: 16 employers. This establishment has 112 OSHA violations; peer median is 15.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CT — for URETEK LLC, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other URETEK LLC locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34-CA-011977 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2008 | Mar 2008 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility · $305,305 in assessed penalties.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URETEK INC 30 LENOX STREET · NEW HAVEN, CT, 06513 | AirWaterRCRA | No Violation Identified | 2 | 1 | $305,305 | Jul 2023 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for URETEK LLC. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-05-14 | Referral | 7 | 7 | $14,900 | |
| 2013-02-07 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $4,500 | |
| 2013-01-16 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $1,418 | |
| 2012-07-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2009-05-18 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2008-06-10 | Planned | 7 | 6 | $5,525 | |
| 2007-12-10 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2006-09-14 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | |
| 2005-03-22 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-10-08 | Complaint | 2 | — | $350 | |
| 1999-07-19 | Planned | 4 | 2 | $486 | |
| 1999-07-19 | Planned | 20 | 12 | $5,035 | |
| 1991-04-25 | Referral | 16 | 10 | $5,000 | |
| 1989-05-11 | Follow-up | 3 | — | $800 | |
| 1988-10-26 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1987-02-19 | Complaint | 38 | 15 | $90,000 | |
| 1979-02-01 | Planned | 11 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in fabric coating mills within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SWIFT TEXTILE METALIZING, LLCBLOOMFIELD — 2 federal enforcement records
- URETEK ARCHER, LLCNEW HAVEN — 1 federal enforcement record
- NELCOTE, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF PARK ELECTROCHEMICAWATERBURY — 1 federal enforcement record
- BROOKWOOD LAMINATING, INC.WAUREGAN — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Fabric Coating MillsAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Fabric Coating Mills in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on URETEK LLC from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is URETEK LLC's OSHA violation history?
- URETEK LLC has 17 OSHA inspections on record with 112 violations and $130,113 in total penalties.
- How does URETEK LLC's safety record compare to its industry?
- URETEK LLC operates in the fabric coating mills industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.2.