Skip to main content

Establishment profile

THE TORO COMPANY

2010 THE BOSS WAY, IRON MOUNTAIN, MI, 49801
Operated by The Toro Company · 1 of 10 establishments
333112Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and Garden Equipment Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
3
over 4 years
Violations
4
$3,500 in penalties
Penalties
$3,500
$875 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

THE TORO COMPANY has accumulated 4 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 4 years of recorded history, with $3,500 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 49th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 75 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 77th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

THE TORO COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, FMCSA motor carrier registration, CPSC product recalls, and NHTSA vehicle recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, or UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
3
0.8 / yr · last 4 yrs
Violations
4
1.0 / yr
Penalties
$3,500
$875 avg / violation
50% serious50% other
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 3
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 3

67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 4 distinct standards shown · 4 citations in this view · $3,500 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
408.12176(1)11$1,750Mar 2025Mar 2025
408.12643(2)11$1,750Mar 2025Mar 2025
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 II11Mar 2025Mar 2025
408.1001111Mar 2025Mar 2025

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

49th

Below average violations in NAICS 3331 within MI. Peer group: 75 employers. This establishment has 4 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
78th
peer median: $450
Inspection frequency
77th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.2
TRIR
7.8
vs industry
+6.0

Reported for 456 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
7.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
1 year ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
1
Quarters non-compliant
1

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
THE TORO COMPANY
1809 N STEPHENSON AVE · IRON MOUNTAIN, MI, 49801
AirRCRATRINo Violation Identified
QNCR 1
10Jan 2023View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
1658247
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for THE TORO COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
5
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The traction drive belt can wear through the mower's fuel tank and cause fuel to leak, posing a fire hazard.. Most recent recall: 2021-02-17. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 5 recalls shown · 5 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Toro Recalls Power Max Snowthrowers Due to Amputation Hazard
#21080
Feb 2021The auger can fail to disengage when the control lever is released, posing an amputation hazard.View →
Toro Recalls Zero Turn Riding Mowers Due to Fire Hazard
#13187
May 2013The idler pulley can rub against the mower's fuel tank, posing a fire hazard.View →
Toro Riding Mowers Recalled Due to Fire Hazard
#13048
Nov 2012The traction drive belt can wear through the mower's fuel tank and cause fuel to leak, posing a fire hazard.View →
Toro Recalls Power Clear Snowblowers and Recycler Mowers Due to Fire or Burn Hazard
#11207
Apr 2011The carburetors on both products develop fuel leaks and can ignite when exposed to an ignition source, posing a fire or burn hazard.View →
Mowers Recalled by The Toro Company Due to Injury Hazard
#11731
Mar 2011Mowers with the optional deluxe seat have an operator presence switch built into the seat that can activate the mower when the operator vacates the seat, posing an injury hazard from the blade to the operator and anyone in the vicinity of the mower.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

NHTSA vehicle & equipment recalls

Total campaigns
2
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units affected
3,488

Most-recalled component: EQUIPMENT. Most recent campaign: 2020-10-09. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, matched on manufacturer name.

NHTSA campaign roster

Every NHTSA recall campaign issued for this manufacturer, most-recent first. Component column shows the primary system cited (airbags, brakes, electrical, fuel system, etc.). FMVSS column shows the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard cited, if any. Potentially affected = NHTSA’s estimate of vehicles in the recall scope. 2 campaigns shown · 961 units potentially affected · 2 distinct components.

CampaignDateComponentVehiclesFMVSSAffected
20V625000Oct 2020EQUIPMENTTORO605
19V847000Nov 2019TRAILER HITCHESTORO356

Source: NHTSA recall database. Each campaign typically covers multiple model years and trims; the Vehicles column shows the distinct makes affected (model lists collapse in this view to keep the row scannable).

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2024-12-03Planned32$3,500
2024-12-03Complaint1$0
2022-05-16Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

THE TORO COMPANY is one of 10 establishments rolled up under the parent organization The Toro Company.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of The Toro Company across all 10 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in lawn and garden tractor and home lawn and garden equipment manufacturing within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by The Toro Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on THE TORO COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup The Toro Company, which operates 10 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is THE TORO COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
THE TORO COMPANY has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 4 violations and $3,500 in total penalties.
How does THE TORO COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
THE TORO COMPANY operates in the lawn and garden tractor and home lawn and garden equipment manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.8. THE TORO COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.2.