Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

Starbucks #5311

1472 1st Street, Livermore, CA, 94550
Operated by Starbucks Corporation · 1 of 259 establishments
453998 — All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores)

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
over 13 years
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

Starbucks #5311 has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

Starbucks #5311 appears in WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
13 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Feb 2011 – Feb 2013All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores)——1——

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for Starbucks Corporation, not this location alone

Total cases
196
Unfair labor practice
80
Representation (union)
116

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Starbucks Corporation locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 28 ULP · 72 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
32-RC-387790Representation electionMay 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-386610Representation electionMay 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-385676Representation electionApr 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-383887Representation electionMar 2026May 2026ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-383295Representation electionMar 2026May 2026ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-383021Representation electionMar 2026Apr 2026ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-382123Unfair labor practiceMar 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RD-381578Representation electionFeb 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-381317Unfair labor practiceFeb 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-379751Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-379554Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-378999Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-378846Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-377875Representation electionDec 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-377811Representation electionDec 2025Feb 2026ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-376661Unfair labor practiceDec 2025—OpenRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-374463Unfair labor practiceNov 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-374148Representation electionSep 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-374046Representation electionSep 2025Nov 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-373844Representation electionSep 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-372509Unfair labor practiceSep 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-372380Representation electionAug 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-RC-372098Representation electionAug 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-369880Representation electionJul 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RC-369162Representation electionJul 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-368968Representation electionJul 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-367840Representation electionJun 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-366713Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-366692Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-366689Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-366711Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-366521Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-364466Representation electionApr 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-363181Representation electionApr 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-362946Representation electionMar 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-361206Representation electionFeb 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-360879Representation electionFeb 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-358728Representation electionJan 2025Mar 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-358502Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-358464Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-358508Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-358640Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Feb 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-357741Representation electionJan 2025Feb 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-357638Representation electionDec 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-357260Representation electionDec 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-354394Representation electionNov 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-354388Representation electionNov 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-353872Representation electionOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-353869Representation electionOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-353848Representation electionOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RC-353780Representation electionOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-RC-350537Representation electionSep 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-347698Representation electionAug 2024Sep 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-347601Representation electionAug 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-RC-346872Representation electionJul 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-345535Representation electionJul 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-345505Representation electionJul 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-343592Representation electionJun 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-341365Representation electionMay 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RM-337280Representation electionMar 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RM-336962Representation electionMar 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RM-336950Representation electionMar 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-336115Representation electionFeb 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-336170Representation electionFeb 2024Mar 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-336049Representation electionFeb 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RM-334739Representation electionJan 2024Mar 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-333674Representation electionJan 2024Mar 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-331272Unfair labor practiceDec 2023Feb 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RM-331129Representation electionDec 2023Mar 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RM-330731Representation electionNov 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-330391Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Nov 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-330347Representation electionNov 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-330356Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-330354Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Nov 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-329865Representation electionNov 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RM-329621Representation electionNov 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-328921Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-328627Representation electionOct 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-RM-328303Representation electionOct 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-328027Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-327409Representation electionOct 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-325145Unfair labor practiceAug 2023—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-324365Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-324326Representation electionAug 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-324137Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-323660Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jul 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-323265Representation electionAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RD-322127Representation electionJul 2023—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-321614Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-321133Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Nov 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-321152Representation electionJul 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-RC-320799Representation electionJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RD-320226Representation electionJun 2023—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-318593Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-317697Representation electionMay 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-316509Representation electionApr 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-316051Representation electionApr 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-316047Representation electionApr 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-315893Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Feb 2026ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-314998Unfair labor practiceMar 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for Starbucks #5311. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
3
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Starbucks Recalls Bodum Recycled Coffee Presses Due to Laceration Hazard
#19114
May 2019The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.—View →
Teavana Recalls Flip Tumblers Due to Burn Hazard
#17128
Apr 2017The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.—View →
Laceration Injuries to Children Prompt Starbucks to Recall Stainless Steel Beverage Straws to Provide New Warnings
#16236
Aug 2016The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.—View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

Starbucks #5311 is one of 259 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Starbucks Corporation.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Starbucks Corporation across all 259 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in all other miscellaneous store retailers (except tobacco stores) within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Starbucks Corporation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on Starbucks #5311 from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Starbucks Corporation, which operates 259 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is Starbucks #5311's OSHA violation history?
Starbucks #5311 has no OSHA inspections on record.
How does Starbucks #5311's safety record compare to its industry?
Starbucks #5311 operates in the all other miscellaneous store retailers (except tobacco stores) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.4.