Skip to main content

Establishment profile

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS

2669 INDUSTRIAL DR, GRAYLING, MI, 49738
321999All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing
EIN 362998685

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 19 years
Violations
12
$4,850 in penalties
Penalties
$4,850
$404 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations · 2 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS has accumulated 12 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 19 years of recorded history, with $4,850 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 62nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 326 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 85th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.3 / yr · last 19 yrs
Violations
12
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$4,850
$404 avg / violation
42% serious58% other
Inspection trigger · referral
3 of 5
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 5

40% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 12 distinct standards shown · 12 citations in this view · $4,850 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
408.11450(2)(B)11$2,100Sep 2016Sep 2016
29 CFR 4081.272411$550Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.07270111$550Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.07310111$550Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.14420211$550Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.271711$550Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0411Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 1910.0146 D0411Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 II11Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 1910.0303 B0211Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.00340211Aug 2007Aug 2007
29 CFR 4081.071111Aug 2007Aug 2007

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

62nd

Above average violations in NAICS 3219 within MI. Peer group: 326 employers. This establishment has 12 OSHA violations; peer median is 7.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
80th
peer median: $1,225
Inspection frequency
85th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−2.3
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−3.5

Reported for 55 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.5
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.3
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jan 23, 2019Amputated,Amputation,Chop Saw,Finger,Foot pedal11
Aug 16, 2017Caught In,Chain,Crushed,Finger,Hand,Laceration,Machine Guarding,Sprocket1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Jul 2014Blind and Shade Manufacturing1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS, LLC
2669 INDUSTRIAL DR · GRAYLING, MI, 49738
AirRCRANo Violation Identified00May 2018View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
1
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The lithium batteries that power the motorized window coverings can overheat, leak or discharge, posing fire and burn hazards.. Most recent recall: 2017-05-05. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 1 recall shown · 1 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Springs Window Fashions Recalls Lithium Batteries Sold with Motorized Window Coverings Due to Fire and Burn Hazards (Recall Alert)
#17743
May 2017The lithium batteries that power the motorized window coverings can overheat, leak or discharge, posing fire and burn hazards.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2019-02-11Referral0$0
2017-09-06Referral0$0
2016-07-29Referral1$2,100
2013-04-26Planned0$0
2007-07-11Planned115$2,750

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in all other miscellaneous wood product manufacturing within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS's OSHA violation history?
SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 12 violations and $4,850 in total penalties.
How does SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS's safety record compare to its industry?
SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS operates in the all other miscellaneous wood product manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.5. SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 2.3.