Establishment profile
SODECIA CO
15260 COMMON RD, ROSEVILLE, MI, 48066
Operated by Sodecia · 1 of 3 establishments
336370 — Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping
Summary
SODECIA CO has accumulated 29 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 16 years of recorded history, with $42,896 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 81st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 1,617 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 76th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SODECIA CO appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
80% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 26 citations in this view · $42,896 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 4081.241201 | 5 | 3 | $2,461 | Aug 2010 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.001503 | 2 | 2 | $3,980 | Oct 2012 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I | 2 | 2 | $2,600 | Aug 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 4081.246102 A | 1 | 1 | $12,500 | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.246303 E | 1 | 1 | $10,000 | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.246303 F | 1 | 1 | $3,200 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 4081.330801 | 1 | 1 | $1,575 | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.126101 D | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.247701 | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 4081.0123 | 1 | 1 | $1,200 | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 4081.128103 | 1 | 1 | $1,200 | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $700 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 4081.018701 | 1 | 1 | $600 | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 4081.263201 A | 1 | 1 | $80 | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 4081.331001 | 1 | 1 | — | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 4081.339201 | 1 | 1 | — | Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 IA | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 4081.063201 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 4081.541602 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
| 29 CFR 4081.0011 D | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2010 | Aug 2010 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3363 within MI. Peer group: 1,617 employers. This establishment has 29 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 355 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SODECIA CO. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SODECIA CO. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SODECIA CO. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in MI — for Sodecia, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Sodecia locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 3 cases · 3 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07-CA-286346 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2021 | Dec 2021 | Closed | Region 07, Detroit, Michigan |
| 07-CA-127393 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2014 | Jun 2014 | Closed | Region 07, Detroit, Michigan |
| 07-CA-071368 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2011 | Aug 2013 | Closed | Region 07, Detroit, Michigan |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SODECIA CO. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SODECIA CO. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-12 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-03-08 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | |
| 2013-01-30 | Complaint | 7 | 4 | $28,200 | |
| 2012-08-16 | Complaint | 8 | 3 | $8,856 | |
| 2010-07-20 | Planned | 13 | 1 | $4,440 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
SODECIA CO is one of 3 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Sodecia.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Sodecia across all 3 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in motor vehicle metal stamping within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- TOWER AUTOMOTIVEELKTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- ADVANCED ASSEMBLY PRODUCTS INCHAZEL PARK — 3 federal enforcement records
- TOWER AUTOMOTIVE INCCLINTON TWP — 3 federal enforcement records
- TOWER AUTOMOTIVE INCTRAVERSE CITY — 3 federal enforcement records
- TROY DESIGN & MANUFACTURING CO.PLYMOUTH — 3 federal enforcement records
- CHALLENGE MANUFACTURING COMPANYWALKER — 3 federal enforcement records
- DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS INCROCHESTER HILLS — 2 federal enforcement records
- LAPEER METAL STAMPINGSEBEWAING — 2 federal enforcement records
- SODECIA NORTH AMERICAROSEVILLE — 2 federal enforcement records
- WICO METAL PRODUCTSCENTER LINE — 2 federal enforcement records
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Sodecia, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SODECIASTERLING HEIGHTS, MI — 2 federal enforcement records
- SODECIA NORTH AMERICA CENTER LINECENTER LINE, MI — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Sodecia locationsParent rollup
- Motor Vehicle Metal StampingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MIState-wide enforcement data
- Motor Vehicle Metal in MIIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SODECIA CO from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Sodecia, which operates 3 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SODECIA CO's OSHA violation history?
- SODECIA CO has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 29 violations and $42,896 in total penalties.
- How does SODECIA CO's safety record compare to its industry?
- SODECIA CO operates in the motor vehicle metal stamping industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.5. SODECIA CO's self-reported DART rate is 2.55 compared to an industry average of 2.1.