SIKA CORPORATION

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 3 citations in this view · $25,318 in penalties.

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

Reported for 27 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Apr 2015

Most frequent event: Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SIKA CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Most-recalled component: EQUIPMENT. Most recent campaign: 2013-04-03. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, matched on manufacturer name.

Every NHTSA recall campaign issued for this manufacturer, most-recent first. Component column shows the primary system cited (airbags, brakes, electrical, fuel system, etc.). FMVSS column shows the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard cited, if any. Potentially affected = NHTSA’s estimate of vehicles in the recall scope. 2 campaigns shown · 2,304 units potentially affected · 1 distinct components.

Source: NHTSA recall database. Each campaign typically covers multiple model years and trims; the Vehicles column shows the distinct makes affected (model lists collapse in this view to keep the row scannable).