Establishment profile
SEIDEL
2223 THOMASTON AVENUE, WATERBURY, CT, 06704
332813 — Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
EIN 823081547
Summary
SEIDEL has accumulated 22 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 32 years of recorded history, with $18,466 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 78th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 127 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 87th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 14 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SEIDEL appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
80% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 19 distinct standards shown · 22 citations in this view · $18,466 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $2,075 | Jan 1994 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I | 2 | 2 | $875 | Jan 1994 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 2 | 2 | $875 | Jan 1994 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C01 | 1 | 1 | $2,700 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C03 | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | Feb 2006 | Feb 2006 |
| 5A0001 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 1 | 1 | $1,666 | Nov 2012 | Nov 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $1,600 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 D02 | 1 | 1 | $1,200 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q01 | 1 | 1 | $1,200 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I | 1 | 1 | $875 | Feb 2006 | Feb 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | $800 | Feb 2006 | Feb 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0029 B01 | 1 | 1 | $500 | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 E02 | 1 | 1 | — | Nov 2012 | Nov 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 F01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H01 I | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q08 I | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 I01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2007 | Jul 2007 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3328 within CT. Peer group: 127 employers. This establishment has 22 OSHA violations; peer median is 9.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 45 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SEIDEL. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 14+ years. Most recent activity: 14 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SEIDEL. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SEIDEL. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CT — for SEIDEL, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other SEIDEL locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34-CA-010700 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2003 | Feb 2004 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SEIDEL. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIDEL, INC. 2223 THOMASTON AVE. · WATERBURY, CT, 06704 | AirWaterRCRA | No Violation Identified QNCR 6 | 3 | 0 | — | Jun 2025 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SEIDEL. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-06-27 | Planned | 2 | 1 | $1,666 | |
| 2007-06-04 | Planned | 14 | 10 | $10,400 | |
| 2005-11-10 | Referral | 3 | 2 | $3,775 | |
| 2002-04-05 | Programmed Other | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-11-04 | Referral | 3 | 3 | $2,625 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- NATIONAL CHROMIUM COMPANY, INC.PUTNAM — 2 federal enforcement records
- UNIMETAL SURFACE FINISHING, LLCTHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.NEWINGTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- J.H. METAL FINISHING INC.NEW BRITAIN — 2 federal enforcement records
- SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICATHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- PAPE ELECTROPLATING COMPANY, LLCNEW BRITAIN — 2 federal enforcement records
- CRC CHROME CORPORATIONMERIDEN — 2 federal enforcement records
- WHYCO FINISHING TECHNOLOGIES, LLCTHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- RAYCO METAL FINISHINGMIDDLETOWN — 2 federal enforcement records
- NYLO METAL FINISHING, LLCWATERBURY — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SEIDEL from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SEIDEL's OSHA violation history?
- SEIDEL has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 22 violations and $18,466 in total penalties.
- How does SEIDEL's safety record compare to its industry?
- SEIDEL operates in the electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1. SEIDEL's self-reported DART rate is 2.18 compared to an industry average of 2.3.