Establishment profile
SBC
2600 CAMINO RAMON, SAN RAMON, CA, 94583
Operated by AT&T Inc · 1 of 2,000 establishments
Summary
SBC has accumulated 9 OSHA violations across 15 inspections over 35 years of recorded history, with $18,675 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 136 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 21 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SBC appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
27% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 5179 within CA. Peer group: 136 employers. This establishment has 9 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for SBC. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SBC. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 21+ years. Most recent activity: 21 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SBC. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SBC. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CA — for AT&T Inc, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other AT&T Inc locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 14 cases · 14 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32-CA-022675 | Unfair labor practice | May 2006 | Apr 2007 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 31-CA-027747 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2006 | Mar 2009 | Closed | Region 31, Los Angeles, California |
| 20-CA-032825 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2005 | Feb 2006 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 21-CA-037083 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2005 | Nov 2008 | Closed | Region 21, Los Angeles, California |
| 32-CA-022333 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2005 | Oct 2007 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 21-CA-036951 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2005 | Nov 2005 | Closed | Region 21, Los Angeles, California |
| 32-CA-022109 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2005 | Apr 2011 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 32-CA-021945 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2005 | Apr 2011 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 32-CA-021833 | Unfair labor practice | Jan 2005 | Apr 2011 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 32-CA-021564 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2004 | Dec 2004 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 32-CA-021338 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2004 | Feb 2009 | Closed | Region 32, Oakland, California |
| 31-CA-026726 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2004 | Aug 2004 | Closed | Region 31, Los Angeles, California |
| 31-CA-026725 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2004 | Aug 2004 | Closed | Region 31, Los Angeles, California |
| 20-CA-031621 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2003 | Apr 2004 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SBC. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SBC. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SBC. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.
Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.
Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-04-08 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-11-12 | Complaint | 5 | 3 | $14,100 | |
| 2004-03-08 | Complaint | 1 | — | $3,000 | |
| 2003-11-07 | Complaint | 2 | — | $1,350 | |
| 1997-05-30 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-01-30 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1996-08-22 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1996-07-31 | Complaint | 1 | — | $225 | |
| 1995-05-02 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-03-24 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-06-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-06-12 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-02-28 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1990-12-14 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1990-08-27 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
SBC is one of 2,000 establishments rolled up under the parent organization AT&T Inc.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of AT&T Inc across all 2,000 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in this industry within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWERCASTAIC — 2 federal enforcement records
- VERIZONPOMONA — 2 federal enforcement records
- LOCKHEED MARTINVANDENBERG AFB — 2 federal enforcement records
- AT & TWOODLAND HILLS — 1 federal enforcement record
- WIRING INDUSTRY RESOURCE EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DBASAN FERNANDO — 1 federal enforcement record
- ERICSSON INC.VALLEJO — 1 federal enforcement record
- OC COMMUNICATIONSSACRAMENTO — 1 federal enforcement record
- SDV Telecommunications, Inc.Grass Valley — 1 federal enforcement record
- PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO DBA AT&T CALIFORNIAARCADIA — 1 federal enforcement record
- WPCS INTERNATIONAL-SUISUN CITY, INC.SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by AT&T Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONEWICHITA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&TSACRAMENTO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&T, INC.NORCROSS, GA — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&TMINNEAPOLIS, MN — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&THOUSTON, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT & TSAN RAMON, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&TRENO, NV — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&TCERRITOS, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&T CORP.NASHVILLE, TN — 3 federal enforcement records
- AT&TArlington, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All AT&T Inc locationsParent rollup
- NAICS 517All employers in this industry
- Employers in CAState-wide enforcement data
- Industry in CAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SBC from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup AT&T Inc, which operates 2,000 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SBC's OSHA violation history?
- SBC has 15 OSHA inspections on record with 9 violations and $18,675 in total penalties.