Establishment profile
RUSKIN COMPANY
3847 WABASH DR., MIRA LOMA, CA, 91752
332322 — Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing
Summary
RUSKIN COMPANY has accumulated 4 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 20 years of recorded history, with $6,635 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 47th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 1,372 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 86th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
RUSKIN COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 3 distinct standards shown · 4 citations in this view · $6,635 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 342 A | 2 | 2 | $3,750 | Feb 2006 | Sep 2012 |
| 4214 A | 1 | 1 | $2,700 | Feb 2006 | Feb 2006 |
| 3203 B02 | 1 | 1 | $185 | Feb 2006 | Feb 2006 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Below average violations in NAICS 3323 within CA. Peer group: 1,372 employers. This establishment has 4 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 142 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for RUSKIN COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2021 | Amputated,Amputation,Couplings,Crushed,Die,Engineering Controls,Finger,Fingertip,Hydraulic,Hydraulic Equipment,Instantaneous amputation,Lack of Engineering Controls,Lockout,Lockout/Tagout,Machine Cycled,Machine operator,Maintenance,Partial Amputation,Struck By,Traumatic Amputation,Unsafe Position | 1 | 1 | — | |
| Jun 19, 2012 | HEAT,AMPUTATED,SHEET METAL,AIR CONDITIONER,FINGER,CAUGHT BETWEEN,CRUSHED,LACERATION,SAFETY BAR | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for RUSKIN COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for RUSKIN COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CA — for RUSKIN COMPANY, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other RUSKIN COMPANY locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-CA-102130 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2013 | Mar 2015 | Closed | Region 21, Los Angeles, California |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for RUSKIN COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSKIN CO 3847 WABASH DR. · MIRA LOMA, CA, 91752 | WaterRCRA | Violation Identified QNCR 12 | 0 | 0 | — | Jul 2019 | View → |
RUSKIN CO 3847 WABASH DR · JURUPA VALLEY, CA, 91752 | RCRA | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for RUSKIN COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-06-26 | Accident | 1 | — | $3,000 | |
| 2005-12-15 | Accident | 3 | 1 | $3,635 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in sheet metal work manufacturing within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- TERRA UNIVERSALFULLERTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- CUSTOM PIPE & FABRICATION INCSTANTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- SANTA ROSA STAINLESS STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.SANTA ROSA — 2 federal enforcement records
- WC BROWN WELDING INCRIALTO — 2 federal enforcement records
- GREIF INCFONTANA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAGHOUSE & INDUSTRIAL SHEET METAL SERVICES, INC.CORONA — 2 federal enforcement records
- ABLE SHEET METAL, INC.LOS ANGELES — 2 federal enforcement records
- TINCO SHEET METAL, INC.MISSION VIEJO — 2 federal enforcement records
- CP MANUFACTURING, INC.SAN DIEGO — 2 federal enforcement records
- MONTEREY MECHANICAL COOAKLAND — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Sheet Metal Work ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CAState-wide enforcement data
- Sheet Metal Work in CAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on RUSKIN COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is RUSKIN COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- RUSKIN COMPANY has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 4 violations and $6,635 in total penalties.
- How does RUSKIN COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- RUSKIN COMPANY operates in the sheet metal work manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.3. RUSKIN COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.9.