Skip to main content

Establishment profile

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS

66237 JORDAN COVE ROAD, NORTH BEND, OR, 97459
Operated by Roseburg Forest products · 1 of 16 establishments
488320Marine Cargo Handling
EIN 931240670

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
14
over 38 years
Violations
24
$14,906 in penalties
Penalties
$14,906
$621 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
3 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS has accumulated 24 OSHA violations across 14 inspections over 38 years of recorded history, with $14,906 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 92nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 131 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 93rd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 3 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS appears in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
14
0.4 / yr · last 38 yrs
Violations
24
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$14,906
$621 avg / violation
50% serious50% other
Inspection trigger · planned
13 of 14
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 14

71% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view · $14,906 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0178 A0611$3,742Oct 2018Oct 2018
29 CFR 1917.0151 B0111$1,500Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1917.0048 G11$1,500Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1917.0048 A0211$1,190Jul 2010Jul 2010
29 CFR 1910.0305 A02 IX11$1,125Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1917.015411$1,125Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1917.0028 E0411$1,125Jul 1991Jul 1991
29 CFR 1917.0151 G0111$975Feb 2008Feb 2008
29 CFR 1917.0152 D01 VII11$957Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1917.0151 H0111$700May 2003May 2003
29 CFR 1917.0050 A11$487Feb 2008Feb 2008
29 CFR 1917.0112 C0411$480Nov 1989Nov 1989
29 CFR 1910.0037 B0411Oct 2018Oct 2018
29 CFR 1917.0122 A11Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1910.0303 B07 IV11Jun 2013Jun 2013
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II11Jul 2010Jul 2010
29 CFR 1917.0120 B0611May 2003May 2003
29 CFR 1910.0178 L0611May 2003May 2003
29 CFR 1917.0111 B11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1917.0011 A11Dec 2001Dec 2001

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

92nd

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 4883 within OR. Peer group: 131 employers. This establishment has 24 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
90th
peer median: $1,000
Inspection frequency
93rd
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
9.4
vs industry
+7.6
TRIR
28.3
vs industry
+25.9

Reported for 15 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
28.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
13
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
3 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 3+ years. Most recent activity: 3 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

Company-level in OR — for Roseburg Forest products, not this location alone

Violations
39
Assessed penalties
$3,392

Mine Safety & Health Administration — citations issued at mining operations. MSHA records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Roseburg Forest products operations in the same state.

MSHA citations

Mine Safety and Health Administration citations. S&S (significant and substantial) marks violations that could reasonably contribute to a serious injury. Negligence rating is MSHA’s operator-culpability assessment (none, low, moderate, high, or reckless disregard). Proposed = assessed at issuance; Paid = post-settlement / appeal. 39 citations · 7S&S · $3,392 proposed / $3,375 paid.

CitationMineDateSectionS&SNegligenceProposedPaid
6352991
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2004YesModNegligence$203$203
7986479
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2001YesModNegligence$196$196
6338549
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$117$100
6438546
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2008YesModNegligence$117$117
6334862
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2001YesModNegligence$113$113
8559300
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6338554
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6338553
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6338552
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6338551
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoLowNegligence$100$100
6338550
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010YesModNegligence$100$100
6338548
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6338547
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2010NoModNegligence$100$100
6399053
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2009NoModNegligence$100$100
6399052
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2009NoModNegligence$100$100
6398927
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Jul 2008YesModNegligence$100$100
6398926
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Jul 2008NoModNegligence$100$100
6398925
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Jul 2008NoModNegligence$100$100
6398924
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Jul 2008NoModNegligence$100$100
6342770
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
May 2007NoLowNegligence$100$100
6352629
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2004YesModNegligence$91$91
6383929
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2006NoModNegligence$60$60
6383928
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2006NoLowNegligence$60$60
6383927
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2006NoLowNegligence$60$60
6383926
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2006NoLowNegligence$60$60
6378481
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Sep 2005NoModNegligence$60$60
6378480
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Sep 2005NoModNegligence$60$60
6378479
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Sep 2005NoModNegligence$60$60
6378477
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Sep 2005NoModNegligence$60$60
6352990
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2004NoModNegligence$60$60
6352651
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2004NoModNegligence$60$60
6352632
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2004NoModNegligence$60$60
6352631
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2004NoLowNegligence$60$60
6352630
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Mar 2004NoModNegligence$60$60
6334861
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2001NoModNegligence$55$55
6334860
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Nov 2001NoModNegligence$55$55
7986462
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2001NoLowNegligence$55$55
7986461
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Apr 2001NoLowNegligence$55$55
7986429
ROSEBURG LUMBER CO PORTABLE
Douglas, OR
Feb 2001NoLowNegligence$55$55

Source: MSHA citation database. “Contractor” annotations indicate the cited party was on-site at the mine but not the mine’s operator -- responsibility attaches to the contractor LLC, not the mine’s owner. Section codes reference 30 CFR (the Mine Safety and Health regulations).

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in OR — for Roseburg Forest products, not this location alone

Total cases
38
Unfair labor practice
38

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Roseburg Forest products locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 38 cases · 38 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
19-CA-386506Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-378392Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-375825Unfair labor practiceNov 2025OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-359074Unfair labor practiceJan 2025May 2026ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-352834Unfair labor practiceOct 2024OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-346571Unfair labor practiceJul 2024OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-341766Unfair labor practiceMay 2024OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-338104Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-337241Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-325443Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-316242Unfair labor practiceApr 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-311957Unfair labor practiceFeb 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-308437Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-308436Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Apr 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-307536Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-307535Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-307534Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-305771Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-300908Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-300906Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Jul 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-285295Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Jul 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-283176Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Sep 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-282519Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-281229Unfair labor practiceAug 2021May 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-281228Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Jul 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-280686Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Apr 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-280210Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Apr 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-280001Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-278155Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-276779Unfair labor practiceMay 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-275100Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-274501Unfair labor practiceMar 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-270187Unfair labor practiceDec 2020Sep 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-269052Unfair labor practiceNov 2020Sep 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-237442Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-215782Unfair labor practiceMar 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-213306Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Mar 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-171134Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Mar 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS CO.
66237 JORDAN COVE RD · NORTH BEND, OR, 97459
WaterRCRANo Violation Identified00Nov 2019View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2023-06-21Planned0$0
2021-09-21Planned0$0
2018-06-27Planned21$3,742
2013-05-30Planned43$3,582
2013-05-30Planned32$2,625
2011-04-19Planned0$0
2010-03-17Planned21$1,190
2008-01-31Planned22$1,462
2003-04-29Planned31$700
2001-12-05Planned2$0
1999-02-18Complaint0$0
1991-07-09Planned21$1,125
1989-10-26Planned21$480
1987-07-20Planned2$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS is one of 16 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Roseburg Forest products.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Roseburg Forest products across all 16 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in marine cargo handling within OR, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Roseburg Forest products, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Roseburg Forest products, which operates 16 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS's OSHA violation history?
ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS has 14 OSHA inspections on record with 24 violations and $14,905.5 in total penalties.
How does ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS's safety record compare to its industry?
ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS operates in the marine cargo handling industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS's self-reported DART rate is 9.44 compared to an industry average of 1.8.