Skip to main content

Establishment profile

PTL ENGINEERING

153 E TIENKEN RD, ROCHESTER HILLS, MI, 48306
Operated by PTL Engineering · 1 of 2 establishments
336211Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
EIN 382296813

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 28 years
Violations
24
$5,500 in penalties
Penalties
$5,500
$229 avg
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

PTL ENGINEERING has accumulated 24 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 28 years of recorded history, with $5,500 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 79th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 204 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 82nd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 19 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

PTL ENGINEERING appears in OSHA workplace safety and NHTSA vehicle recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, or CPSC product recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.2 / yr · last 28 yrs
Violations
24
0.9 / yr
Penalties
$5,500
$229 avg / violation
75% serious25% other
Inspection trigger · planned
4 of 5
Inspection trigger · follow-up
1 of 5

40% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 22 citations in this view · $5,500 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 4081.07270122$550Sep 1998Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.00340322$550Sep 1998Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.00340911$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.071111$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I11$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 IA11$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.24110211$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.24120111$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.24610111$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.246307 C11$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.24770111$400Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.263501 B11$200Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.277011$150Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.24620111$150Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.33120111$150Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.263502 A11$150Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.24340111Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 4081.00360111Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.12230111Sep 1998Sep 1998
29 CFR 4081.21310111Sep 1998Sep 1998

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

79th

Above average violations in NAICS 3362 within MI. Peer group: 204 employers. This establishment has 24 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
77th
peer median: $900
Inspection frequency
82nd
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−2.8
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−4.9

Reported for 40 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
4
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
19 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 19+ years. Most recent activity: 19 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PTL ENGINEERING. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

NHTSA vehicle & equipment recalls

Total campaigns
1
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units affected
442

Most-recalled component: EQUIPMENT:RECREATIONAL VEHICLE/TRAILER. Most recent campaign: 2018-07-27. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, matched on manufacturer name.

NHTSA campaign roster

Every NHTSA recall campaign issued for this manufacturer, most-recent first. Component column shows the primary system cited (airbags, brakes, electrical, fuel system, etc.). FMVSS column shows the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard cited, if any. Potentially affected = NHTSA’s estimate of vehicles in the recall scope. 1 campaign shown · 442 units potentially affected · 1 distinct components.

CampaignDateComponentVehiclesFMVSSAffected
18E062000Jul 2018EQUIPMENT:RECREATIONAL VEHICLE/TRAILERPTL ENGINEERING206442

Source: NHTSA recall database. Each campaign typically covers multiple model years and trims; the Vehicles column shows the distinct makes affected (model lists collapse in this view to keep the row scannable).

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2007-04-12Planned0$0
2006-10-04Planned0$0
2001-10-19Follow-up0$0
2001-06-04Planned1211$4,400
1998-08-27Planned127$1,100

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

PTL ENGINEERING is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization PTL Engineering.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of PTL Engineering across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in motor vehicle body manufacturing within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by PTL Engineering, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PTL ENGINEERING from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup PTL Engineering, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is PTL ENGINEERING's OSHA violation history?
PTL ENGINEERING has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 24 violations and $5,500 in total penalties.
How does PTL ENGINEERING's safety record compare to its industry?
PTL ENGINEERING operates in the motor vehicle body manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.9. PTL ENGINEERING's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 2.8.