Establishment profile
PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.
2770 WELBORN STREET, PELHAM, AL, 35124
333413 — Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing
Summary
PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. has accumulated 10 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 40 years of recorded history, with $23,563 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 80th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 36 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 94th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, and OFLC visa and labor certification (historical) records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
60% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 10 distinct standards shown · 10 citations in this view · $23,563 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0179 N03 I | 1 | 1 | $11,094 | Aug 2022 | Aug 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0179 G01 V | 1 | 1 | $7,925 | Aug 2022 | Aug 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 1 | 1 | $2,525 | Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 1 | 1 | $2,020 | Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 II | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 F02 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G01 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A02 | 1 | 1 | — | Jun 1986 | Jun 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | — | Jun 1986 | Jun 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0252 E02 III | 1 | 1 | — | Jun 1986 | Jun 1986 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3334 within AL. Peer group: 36 employers. This establishment has 10 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 138 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Aug 2018 – Mar 2022 · 2 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Struck by falling object or equipment, n.e.c.
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2022 | Struck by object or equipment, unspecified | Leg(s), unspecified | Hospitalized | |
| May 28, 2021 | Struck by falling object or equipment, unspecified | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation | |
| Aug 23, 2018 | Struck by falling object or equipment, n.e.c. | Lower leg(s) | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2021 | Amputated,Amputation,Crushed,Falling Object,Finger,Fingertip,Iron,Iron Worker,Surgical Amputation | 1 | — | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
Company-level in AL — for PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC., not this location alone
Mine Safety & Health Administration — citations issued at mining operations. MSHA records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. operations in the same state.
MSHA citations
Mine Safety and Health Administration citations. S&S (significant and substantial) marks violations that could reasonably contribute to a serious injury. Negligence rating is MSHA’s operator-culpability assessment (none, low, moderate, high, or reckless disregard). Proposed = assessed at issuance; Paid = post-settlement / appeal. 13 citations · 8S&S · 13 contractor · $5,678 proposed / $5,630 paid.
| Citation | Mine | Date | Section | S&S | Negligence | Proposed | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7788474 | Demopolis Plant Cemex Inc Marengo, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Feb 2008 | — | Yes | HighNegligence | $1,412 | $1,412 |
| 7788473 | Demopolis Plant Cemex Inc Marengo, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Feb 2008 | — | Yes | HighNegligence | $1,412 | $1,412 |
| 7788472 | Demopolis Plant Cemex Inc Marengo, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Feb 2008 | — | Yes | HighNegligence | $1,412 | $1,412 |
| 8630123 | LONGVIEW OPERATION Shelby, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Mar 2011 | — | Yes | ModNegligence | $372 | $372 |
| 6511856 | Amrize Theodore Plant Mobile, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Feb 2009 | — | Yes | LowNegligence | $243 | $195 |
| 6092971 | Amrize Theodore Plant Mobile, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Jan 2004 | — | Yes | ModNegligence | $165 | $165 |
| 9755625 | Amrize Theodore Plant Mobile, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Feb 2024 | — | No | HighNegligence | $147 | $147 |
| 6091948 | Leeds Plant Jefferson, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Jan 2003 | — | Yes | ModNegligence | $129 | $129 |
| 6092972 | Amrize Theodore Plant Mobile, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Jan 2004 | — | Yes | LowNegligence | $114 | $114 |
| 8630124 | LONGVIEW OPERATION Shelby, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Mar 2011 | — | No | ModNegligence | $112 | $112 |
| 6508282 | Demopolis Plant Cemex Inc Marengo, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | May 2009 | — | No | ModNegligence | $100 | $100 |
| 6094413 | LONGVIEW OPERATION Shelby, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Jun 2004 | — | No | ModNegligence | $60 | $60 |
| 8630122 | LONGVIEW OPERATION Shelby, AL contractor: Process Equipment Co | Mar 2011 | — | No | — | — | — |
Source: MSHA citation database. “Contractor” annotations indicate the cited party was on-site at the mine but not the mine’s operator -- responsibility attaches to the contractor LLC, not the mine’s owner. Section codes reference 30 CFR (the Mine Safety and Health regulations).
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
Office of Foreign Labor Certification — labor condition applications for H-1B, H-2A, H-2B visa programs. Wage ratio = offered / prevailing wage. Historical data only: DOL ended OFLC Performance Data Disclosure publication in 2026, so the figures above reflect filings through the last ingested cycle and are not being refreshed. Treat as a historical snapshot, not a current signal.
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of Homeland SecurityREPAIR INCINERATOR FAN BLADEcontract · Last action 2010-08-20$2,268
- Department of Homeland SecurityFAN BALANCING FOR INCINERATORcontract · Last action 2010-08-16$1,792
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 333412 - INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL FAN AND BLOWER MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2010-08-20. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-15 | Referral | 2 | — | $19,019 | |
| 2021-06-04 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2019-01-30 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-11-27 | Planned | 5 | 2 | $4,544 | |
| 1986-06-11 | Complaint | 3 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in industrial and commercial fan and blower and air purification equipment manufacturing within AL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- FILTERS-NOW, LLCCREOLA — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in ALState-wide enforcement data
- Industrial and Commercial in ALIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 10 violations and $23,563.4 in total penalties.
- How does PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. operates in the industrial and commercial fan and blower and air purification equipment manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.8.