Skip to main content

Establishment profile

PRETIUM PACKAGING

2041 S 5070 W, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84104
Operated by Pretium Packaging · 1 of 18 establishments
326160Plastics Bottle Manufacturing
EIN 201082239

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 8 years
Violations
11
$10,675 in penalties
Penalties
$10,675
$970 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

PRETIUM PACKAGING has accumulated 11 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 8 years of recorded history, with $10,675 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 87th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 161 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 93rd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 10 months ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

PRETIUM PACKAGING appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.6 / yr · last 8 yrs
Violations
11
1.4 / yr
Penalties
$10,675
$970 avg / violation
82% serious18% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 5
Inspection trigger · accident
2 of 5

60% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 8 distinct standards shown · 11 citations in this view · $10,675 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0122$5,275Feb 2018Aug 2025
29 CFR 1910.0215 A0422Feb 2018Aug 2025
29 CFR 1910.0215 B0922Feb 2018Aug 2025
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I11$2,450Oct 2023Oct 2023
UAC R614-1-5.D.111$2,450Oct 2023Oct 2023
UAC R614-1-5.B.111$500Oct 2023Oct 2023
UAC R614-1-5.D.511Aug 2025Aug 2025
29 CFR 1910.0212 B11Feb 2018Feb 2018

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

87th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3261 within UT. Peer group: 161 employers. This establishment has 11 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
98th
peer median: $375
Inspection frequency
93rd
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.4
vs industry
+1.3
TRIR
4.0
vs industry
+2.2

Reported for 173 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
4.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
2
Accident
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for PRETIUM PACKAGING. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
10 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 10 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PRETIUM PACKAGING. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PRETIUM PACKAGING. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in UT — for Pretium Packaging, not this location alone

Total cases
1
Unfair labor practice
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Pretium Packaging locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
27-CA-353259Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PRETIUM PACKAGING. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
1
Quarters non-compliant
0

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
PRETIUM PACKAGING, LLC
1831 S 4800 W · SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84104
WaterNo Violation Identified10May 2022View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for PRETIUM PACKAGING. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-08-12Planned43$4,900
2025-07-18Complaint0$0
2024-06-12Complaint0$0
2023-10-05Accident32$5,400
2018-01-03Accident44$375

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

PRETIUM PACKAGING is one of 18 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Pretium Packaging.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Pretium Packaging across all 18 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in plastics bottle manufacturing within UT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Pretium Packaging, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PRETIUM PACKAGING from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Pretium Packaging, which operates 18 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is PRETIUM PACKAGING's OSHA violation history?
PRETIUM PACKAGING has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 11 violations and $10,675 in total penalties.
How does PRETIUM PACKAGING's safety record compare to its industry?
PRETIUM PACKAGING operates in the plastics bottle manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.9. PRETIUM PACKAGING's self-reported DART rate is 2.43 compared to an industry average of 1.1.