Establishment profile
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY
SPUR 119 NORTH, BORGER, TX, 79007
Operated by Phillips 66 · 1 of 169 establishments
324110 — Petroleum Refineries
EIN 371652702
Summary
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY has accumulated 2 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 38 years of recorded history, with $13,534 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 56th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 231 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 77th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 2 citations in this view · $13,534 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 F01 III B | 1 | 1 | $12,934 | May 2018 | May 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0404 A01 | 1 | 1 | $600 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3241 within TX. Peer group: 231 employers. This establishment has 2 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 685 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Sep 2023
Most frequent event: Stings and venomous bites
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2023 | Stings and venomous bites | BODY SYSTEMS | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2017 | Burn,Chemical,Hydrogen Sulfide,Steam,Thigh | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in TX — for Phillips 66, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Phillips 66 locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 12 cases · 9 ULP · 3 representation
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16-RD-247503 | Representation election | Sep 2019 | Oct 2019 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-246004 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2019 | Sep 2019 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-RC-183966 | Representation election | Sep 2016 | Oct 2016 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-165692 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2015 | Mar 2016 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-163271 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2015 | Mar 2016 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-136053 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2014 | Nov 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-RC-133358 | Representation election | Jul 2014 | Sep 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-133392 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2014 | Sep 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-090333 | Unfair labor practice | Oct 2012 | Nov 2012 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-089250 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2012 | May 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-089036 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2012 | May 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
| 16-CA-087373 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2012 | May 2014 | Closed | Region 16, Fort Worth, Texas |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY LOC. SOUTH SIDE OF PHILLIPS · BORGER, TX, 79007 | Air | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
First case: 2026-01-20. Most recent: 2026-01-20. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.
Federal prosecution case file
Federal corporate prosecution records from the University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry. DPA = Deferred Prosecution Agreement; NPA = Non-Prosecution Agreement; both are pre-trial settlements where the defendant accepts terms but avoids conviction. Monitor = court-appointed compliance oversight, usually 2-5 years. 1 case · $8,028,572 in penalties / restitution.
| Case | Date | Disposition | Crime | Jurisdiction | Total payment | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States v. Phillips 66 Company Phillips 66 Co. · PSX | Jan 2026 | DP | Environmental | California - Central | $8,028,572 | No |
Source: University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry (maintained by Prof. Brandon L. Garrett, Duke University). The registry has no state or jurisdiction-of-incorporation field on the company side, so same-name employers in different states may mis-attribute -- verify against the source case documents when precision matters.
Federal contracts
No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.
Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.
Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | Unprogrammed Related | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2017-11-28 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $12,934 | |
| 1988-06-01 | Unprogrammed Related | 1 | 1 | $600 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY is one of 169 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Phillips 66.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Phillips 66 across all 169 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in petroleum refineries within TX, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- PASADENA REFINING SYSTEM, INC.PASADENA — 4 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYOLD OCEAN — 3 federal enforcement records
- DELEK REFINING, LTD.TYLER — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 SWEENY REFINERYOLD OCEAN — 3 federal enforcement records
- SHELL DEER PARK REFINING LPDEER PARK — 3 federal enforcement records
- SHELL CHEMICAL LPDEER PARK — 3 federal enforcement records
- HOUSTON REFINING, LPHOUSTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYBORGER — 2 federal enforcement records
- MARATHON GALVESTON BAY REFINERYTEXAS CITY — 2 federal enforcement records
- BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.TEXAS CITY — 2 federal enforcement records
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Phillips 66, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYOLD OCEAN, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 SWEENY REFINERYOLD OCEAN, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYROXANA, IL — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY REFINERYFERNDALE, WA — 3 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYBORGER, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYWILMINGTON, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYPASADENA, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
- MARYSVILLE HYDROCARBONSMARYSVILLE, MI — 2 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 ALLIANCE REFINERYBELLE CHASSE, LA — 2 federal enforcement records
- PHILLIPS 66 LOS ANGELES REFINERYCARSON, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All Phillips 66 locationsParent rollup
- Petroleum RefineriesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in TXState-wide enforcement data
- Petroleum Refineries in TXIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Phillips 66, which operates 169 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 2 violations and $13,534 in total penalties.
- How does PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY operates in the petroleum refineries industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.4. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 0.2.