Establishment profile
NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION
205 SCHOOL STREET SUITE 201, GARDNER, MA, 01440
322211 — Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing
Summary
NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION has accumulated 81 OSHA violations across 16 inspections over 40 years of recorded history, with $70,679 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 141 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 99th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
88% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 12 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 44 citations in this view · $64,406 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 6 | 4 | $4,848 | Jan 1986 | Dec 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0261 A04 II | 4 | 1 | — | Jun 1997 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I | 3 | 3 | $13,359 | Sep 2018 | Dec 2024 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0261 B01 | 3 | 1 | $1,900 | Jun 1997 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0002 A | 3 | 2 | $1,500 | Dec 1987 | Apr 2001 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 P01 | 3 | 3 | $1,188 | Jun 2000 | Mar 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III | 3 | 3 | $413 | Jan 1986 | Nov 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L06 | 2 | 2 | $5,821 | Jun 2000 | Sep 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 2 | 2 | $774 | Jan 1986 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 V | 2 | 2 | $701 | Jan 1986 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0261 A03 II | 2 | 1 | $650 | Jun 1997 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 A06 | 2 | 2 | $413 | Jan 1986 | Nov 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 D01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 1997 | Nov 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 F01 | 1 | 1 | $14,518 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 |
| 5A0001 | 1 | 1 | $8,000 | Aug 2021 | Aug 2021 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II B | 1 | 1 | $5,821 | Sep 2018 | Sep 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 N04 | 1 | 1 | $1,750 | Jun 2000 | Jun 2000 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0041 A01 I | 1 | 1 | $1,266 | May 2025 | May 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0261 M03 | 1 | 1 | $800 | Jun 1997 | Jun 1997 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0253 B02 II | 1 | 1 | $688 | Nov 2003 | Nov 2003 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3222 within MA. Peer group: 141 employers. This establishment has 81 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 147 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · May 2018 – Mar 2021 · 1 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, unspecified
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021 | Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, unspecified | Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders | Hospitalized | |
| Feb 19, 2020 | Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecified | Arm(s), unspecified | Hospitalized | |
| May 15, 2018 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Hand(s), unspecified | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021 | Broken Bone,Fracture,Moving,Rib | 1 | 1 | — | |
| Feb 19, 2020 | Arm,Belt,Broken Bone,Caught By,Forearm,Fracture,Pinch Point | 1 | 1 | — | |
| May 15, 2018 | Arm,Caught By,Finger,Fracture,Hand,Nip Point | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE 75 LOGAN ST · GARDNER, MA, 01440 | AirRCRA | No Violation Identified QNCR 2 | 2 | 0 | — | Jul 2024 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-25 | Complaint | 1 | — | $1,266 | |
| 2024-07-02 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2024-06-17 | Referral | 2 | 1 | $14,518 | |
| 2021-03-12 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $8,000 | |
| 2020-02-21 | Referral | 2 | 1 | $13,359 | |
| 2018-05-21 | Referral | 4 | 4 | $11,641 | |
| 2010-10-27 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $3,150 | |
| 2006-03-07 | Complaint | 2 | 2 | $1,000 | |
| 2003-09-11 | Complaint | 9 | 8 | $4,675 | |
| 2001-04-06 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2000-06-01 | Referral | 4 | 1 | $1,750 | |
| 1997-05-14 | Planned | 27 | 13 | $8,000 | |
| 1990-04-10 | Complaint | 4 | 4 | $1,120 | |
| 1987-09-08 | Planned | 3 | — | $1,500 | |
| 1986-01-14 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1985-12-30 | Planned | 20 | 4 | $700 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing within MA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SOUTHERN CONTAINER CORPORATIONDEVENS — 2 federal enforcement records
- SEABOARD FOLDING BOX COMPANY, INCFITCHBURG — 2 federal enforcement records
- LIFEWORKS INCORPORATEDWESTWOOD — 2 federal enforcement records
- INTERSTATE CONTAINERFITCHBURG — 2 federal enforcement records
- INTERSTATE CONTAINERLOWELL — 2 federal enforcement records
- MASSACHUSETTS CONTAINER CORP.MARLBOROUGH — 2 federal enforcement records
- WESTROCK COMPANYSPRINGFIELD — 2 federal enforcement records
- PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICACHELMSFORD — 1 federal enforcement record
- MOUNT TOM BOX COMPANY, LLCWEST SPRINGFIELD — 1 federal enforcement record
- REM MFG. CORP.LEOMINSTER — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MAState-wide enforcement data
- Corrugated and Solid in MAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
- NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION has 16 OSHA inspections on record with 81 violations and $70,678.6 in total penalties.
- How does NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
- NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION operates in the corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.5. NEW ENGLAND WOODEN WARE CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 4.89 compared to an industry average of 1.7.