Skip to main content

Establishment profile

MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.

1000 BRUNERSTOWN ROAD, SHELBYVILLE, KY, 40065
332439Other Metal Container Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
4
over 13 years
Violations
15
$28,800 in penalties
Penalties
$28,800
$1,920 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. has accumulated 15 OSHA violations across 4 inspections over 13 years of recorded history, with $28,800 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 84th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 45 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 86th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 8 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
4
0.3 / yr · last 13 yrs
Violations
15
1.2 / yr
Penalties
$28,800
$1,920 avg / violation
60% serious40% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 4
Inspection trigger · referral
1 of 4

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 15 distinct standards shown · 15 citations in this view · $28,800 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0511$5,500Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0022 B0111$3,500Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0252 B02 III11$3,500Jan 2013Jan 2013
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04I11$2,334Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06I11$2,333Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0147 D04I11$2,333Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 2031.00211$2,250Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0022 D0111$2,250Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$2,250Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0022 B0211$2,125Jan 2013Jan 2013
29 CFR 1904.0029 A11$425Jan 2013Jan 2013
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0211Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0253 B04III11Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0303 G01II11Aug 2013Aug 2013
29 CFR 1910.0305 G02III11Aug 2013Aug 2013

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

84th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3324 within KY. Peer group: 45 employers. This establishment has 15 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
100th
peer median: $3,000
Inspection frequency
86th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.4
vs industry
−2.2
TRIR
2.0
vs industry
−3.0

Reported for 659 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
5.0
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.6
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2
Referral
1
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
8 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 8+ years. Most recent activity: 8 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in KY — for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC., not this location alone

Total cases
55
Unfair labor practice
55

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 55 cases · 55 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
09-CA-359241Unfair labor practiceJan 2025OpenRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-311414Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Mar 2023ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-311152Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-308955Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-308752Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-300992Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-298708Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-295727Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-288385Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Dec 2025ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-284744Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Jan 2023ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-283896Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Nov 2025ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-283545Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Aug 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-277636Unfair labor practiceMay 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-276047Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Nov 2025ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-276151Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Sep 2025ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-261159Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Jun 2020ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-238700Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-229736Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-228090Unfair labor practiceSep 2018Jun 2019ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-227681Unfair labor practiceSep 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-219806Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-217205Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-213829Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Mar 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-207382Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-204889Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202765Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Aug 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202753Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202710Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Jul 2019ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202699Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202693Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-202193Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Apr 2019ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-201260Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Sep 2021ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-198348Unfair labor practiceMay 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-188572Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-187914Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-186691Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-185222Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Sep 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-184894Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-183937Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-183523Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Jul 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-182821Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-182454Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Mar 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-181732Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-181073Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-180548Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-179541Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Jul 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-177899Unfair labor practiceJun 2016Aug 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-177471Unfair labor practiceJun 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-082188Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-073505Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Mar 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-073485Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Mar 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-073481Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Mar 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-073459Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Mar 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-069967Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044046Unfair labor practiceDec 2007Dec 2007ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
2
Quarters non-compliant
5

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Significant Violation.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility · 1 significant noncompliance.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING
1000 OLD BRUNERSTOWN RD · SHELBYVILLE, KY, 40065
WaterSignificant Violation
QNCR 5
20Feb 2026View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2018-02-20Complaint0$0
2017-11-07Referral0$0
2013-03-07Follow-up127$22,750
2012-08-21Complaint32$6,050

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other metal container manufacturing within KY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. has 4 OSHA inspections on record with 15 violations and $28,800 in total penalties.
How does MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC. operates in the other metal container manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5. MARTINREA HEAVY STAMPING, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.43 compared to an industry average of 2.6.