Skip to main content

Establishment profile

KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER

2201 LEXINGTON AVE, WESTWOOD, KY, 41101
Operated by Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center
622110General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
EIN 610444716

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
10
over 39 years
Violations
5
$5,600 in penalties
Penalties
$5,600
$1,120 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER has accumulated 5 OSHA violations across 10 inspections over 39 years of recorded history, with $5,600 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 91st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 157 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 97th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
10
0.3 / yr · last 39 yrs
Violations
5
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$5,600
$1,120 avg / violation
60% serious40% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
7 of 10
Inspection trigger · planned
3 of 10

30% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 5 distinct standards shown · 5 citations in this view · $5,600 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1030 D04 IIIA211$3,111Oct 1993Oct 1993
29 CFR 1910.1030 D03 VIII11$1,556Oct 1993Oct 1993
29 CFR 1910.0133 A0111$933Oct 1993Oct 1993
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0211May 1992May 1992
29 CFR 2018.0040211Feb 1992Feb 1992

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

91st

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 6221 within KY. Peer group: 157 employers. This establishment has 5 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
93rd
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
97th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
32.5
vs industry
+30.4
TRIR
35.1
vs industry
+30.0

Reported for 3,094 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
5.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
35.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
3
Complaint
7

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
9 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in KY — for Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center, not this location alone

Total cases
173
Unfair labor practice
173

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 100 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
09-CA-290773Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-290733Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-135956Unfair labor practiceSep 2014Sep 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-135919Unfair labor practiceSep 2014Sep 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-135640Unfair labor practiceAug 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-127778Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jan 2017ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-126965Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-125939Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-118831Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Feb 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-118715Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Dec 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-115795Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-115792Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-114900Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-114828Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-111815Unfair labor practiceAug 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-109905Unfair labor practiceJul 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-109655Unfair labor practiceJul 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-101541Unfair labor practiceMar 2013May 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-094407Unfair labor practiceDec 2012Jan 2014ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-088141Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Oct 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-088109Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Oct 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-082415Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jun 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-079964Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-076898Unfair labor practiceMar 2012Apr 2013ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-072850Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Feb 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-067722Unfair labor practiceOct 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-063108Unfair labor practiceAug 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-061391Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-060640Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-060261Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Jul 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-060110Unfair labor practiceMay 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-060086Unfair labor practiceMay 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-060010Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046371Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046313Unfair labor practiceMar 2011Apr 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046305Unfair labor practiceMar 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046256Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011Apr 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046242Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011Nov 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046188Unfair labor practiceJan 2011Feb 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046167Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Mar 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-046039Unfair labor practiceOct 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045998Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045970Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045969Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045954Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045935Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045934Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045929Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045908Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Jul 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045907Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045899Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045898Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045897Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045896Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045895Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Jul 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045894Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045893Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Jul 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045892Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Jan 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045891Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Jan 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045855Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045852Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045800Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045785Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045781Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045731Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045711Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045710Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045709Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Dec 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045584Unfair labor practiceApr 2010May 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045523Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045439Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045438Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045420Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Mar 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045406Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Feb 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045405Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Jan 2012ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045393Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Feb 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045392Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045391Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Feb 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045363Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045362Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Mar 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045354Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045353Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045352Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045281Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Jul 2011ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045252Unfair labor practiceOct 2009Oct 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045251Unfair labor practiceOct 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045142Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Sep 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045106Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Sep 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045105Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045090Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045089Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Feb 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045081Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Aug 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045071Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Aug 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-045054Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Mar 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044954Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044953Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Aug 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044925Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Aug 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044920Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Jul 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044900Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Jun 2009ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-044870Unfair labor practiceMar 2009Jun 2010ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2016-10-13Complaint0$0
2010-08-11Complaint0$0
2004-08-06Planned0$0
1998-02-25Complaint0$0
1993-08-03Complaint33$5,600
1993-06-07Complaint0$0
1992-04-09Complaint1$0
1991-09-20Planned0$0
1991-09-06Complaint1$0
1987-04-07Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER is one of 1 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center across all 1 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in general medical and surgical hospitals within KY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a Kings Daughters Medical Center.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER's OSHA violation history?
KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER has 10 OSHA inspections on record with 5 violations and $5,600 in total penalties.
How does KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER's safety record compare to its industry?
KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER operates in the general medical and surgical hospitals industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5.1. KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER's self-reported DART rate is 32.46 compared to an industry average of 2.1.