Establishment profile
Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.
777 East Park Drive, Harrisburg, PA, 17111
Operated by KEPRO
518210 — Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
Summary
Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.
The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 8 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. appears in WHD wage enforcement record only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 1,007 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 8+ years. Most recent activity: 8 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 2 statutes · 322 violations · $1,209,639 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service Contract Act (federal services) | Dec 2017 | 3 | 317 | 279 | $1,209,503 | — |
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Dec 2017 | 3 | 5 | 2 | $135 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 3 cases · 322 violations · $1,209,639 in backwages · 280 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2017 | Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services | FLSASCA | 6 | 4 | $5,043 | — |
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2017 | Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services | FLSASCA | 10 | 6 | $23,738 | — |
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2017 | Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services | FLSASCA | 306 | 270 | $1,180,857 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.
- Department of Health and Human ServicesMEDICAL CLAIMS REVIEW AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT (FTCA) DEEMED HEALTH CENTERS AND FREE CLINICScontract · Last action 2024-08-06$34,021,263
- Department of Health and Human ServicesIGF::OT::IGF HEALTH CENTERS AND FREE CLINICS FTCA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE PROGRAMS MEDICAL CLAIMS REVIEW AND RISK MANAGEMENT CONTRACTcontract · Last action 2022-07-11$23,961,110
- Department of Health and Human ServicesOTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICEScontract · Last action 2018-03-06$14,138,827
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT (TQMC)contract · Last action 2022-10-05$9,513,850
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF TRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT(TQMC)contract · Last action 2022-09-09$9,380,030
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT(TQMC)contract · Last action 2022-07-28$8,665,287
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING SERVICEScontract · Last action 2022-06-30$7,283,477
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF TRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT(TQMC)contract · Last action 2022-05-24$7,193,435
- Department of Health and Human ServicesOTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICEScontract · Last action 2011-03-24$6,382,331
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0028 IS TO ORDER QUANTITY AND FUND SERVICES FOR OPTION PERIOD 4 (APRIL 01, 2014 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2015). THE LINE ITEMS IDENTIFIED HEREIN HAVE BEEN EXERCISED FOR OPTION PERIOD 4 BY MODIFICATION P00107 TO THE BASIC CONTRACT.contract · Last action 2017-04-24$5,980,098
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING SERVICEScontract · Last action 2024-10-25$3,883,562
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT (TQMC)contract · Last action 2023-06-20$3,282,871
- Department of DefenseFUNDING OPTION PERIOD 1contract · Last action 2013-02-12$3,220,525
- Department of DefenseTHE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0013 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES FOR OPTION PERIOD 2 (FISCAL YEAR 2012 - APRIL 01, 2012 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2012; AND FISCAL YEAR 2013 - OCTOBER 01, 2012 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2013).contract · Last action 2015-06-03$3,108,266
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING SERVICEScontract · Last action 2023-01-27$2,990,209
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING SERVICEScontract · Last action 2023-06-23$2,887,053
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0024 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES FOR OPTION PERIOD 3.contract · Last action 2015-06-03$2,235,759
- Department of DefenseTRICARE QUALITY MONITORING SERVICEScontract · Last action 2025-02-25$1,663,522
- Department of DefenseORDER FOR TRANSITION SERVICES RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE TQMC CONTRACT HT9402-10-D-0001 (PHASE IN / DIACAP PHASE IN AND PLAN INTERNAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN. - THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDER IS THE DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD NOTICE WAS ISSUED WHICH WAS 5/28/2010 - CONTRACTING OFFICERcontract · Last action 2010-06-08$669,111
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF TRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT(TQMC)IS AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) ADVISORY&ASSISTANCE SERVICES A&AS)CONTRACT.contract · Last action 2016-08-29$364,783
- Office of Personnel ManagementFY21 (AT 34461) HI/FEIO FEHB MEDICAL REVIEW SERVICEScontract · Last action 2021-08-18$273,000
- Office of Personnel ManagementFEHB MEDICAL REVIEW SERVICEScontract · Last action 2023-09-12$240,000
- Office of Personnel ManagementFY22 HI/FEIO FEHB MEDICAL REVIEW SERVICEScontract · Last action 2022-07-14$240,000
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0014 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDERS 1009-12-02, 1009-12-03, AND 1009-12-04, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 1009AF LONG HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, AND 1009-12-05, ASSIGNED TO SLIN 1009AE SHORT HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED TASK ORDERS ON PAGES 4 THROUGH 7 OF THIS DOCUMENT.contract · Last action 2012-03-22$136,167
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF TRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT (TQMC) PROVIDES DHA WITH INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE PROVIDED IN THE TRICARE PURCHASED CARE SYSTEM.contract · Last action 2016-05-05$42,371
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OF THE SERVICES REQUIRED FOR A LONG HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 4009AB. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF EQUINE THERAPY, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS TASK ORDER.contract · Last action 2015-07-23$42,371
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF TASK ORDER 0031 IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OF THE SERVICES REQUIRED FOR A LONG HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 4009AB. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS OTHER THAN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER.contract · Last action 2015-01-21$42,371
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF TASK ORDER 0030 IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OF THE SERVICES REQUIRED FOR A LONG HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 4009AB. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION AND SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE TASK ORDER ON PAGES FOUR AND FIVE OF THIS DOCUMENT.contract · Last action 2014-06-30$42,371
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0018 IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING FOR SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDER 2009-12-01, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 2009AB. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE TASK ORDER ON PAGES FOUR THROUGH SIX OF THIS DOCUMENT.contract · Last action 2012-06-14$39,939
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0010 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDER 1009-12-01, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 1009 AF. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF ARTIFICIAL DISC REPLACEMENT FOR LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE TASK ORDER ON PAGE 4 OF THIS DOCUMENT.contract · Last action 2011-12-08$38,775
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0006 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDER 1009-11-01, ASSIGNED TO SLIN 1009AB. THE SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE FULL IN-DEPTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) SCANNING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL MASS AND POSSIBLE RENAL CELL CARCINOMA RECURRANCE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE TASK ORDER ON PAGE 3 OF THIS DOCUMENT. B. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.contract · Last action 2011-06-28$38,775
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF TRICARE QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT (TQMC) PROVIDES DHA WITH INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE PROVIDED IN THE TRICARE PURCHASED CARE SYSTEM.contract · Last action 2016-05-05$21,681
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0025 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 3009-13-01, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (SLIN) 3009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR CRANIAL ELECTROTHERAPY STIMULATION, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. B. SLIN 3009AA WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE BASIC CONTRACT AND WAS EXERCISED BY MODIFICATION P00057 FOR OPTION PERIOD 3. C. A TOTAL OF $21,049.16 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORED 0025 USING FY2013 FUNDING AND IS ACCOMPLISHED UNDER OPTION PERIOD 3. D. ALL REMAINING TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2013-09-16$21,049
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A.THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0023 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 2009-13-05, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) 2009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR POST-TREATMENT LYME DISEASE, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT.contract · Last action 2013-03-22$20,436
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0021 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 2009-13-03, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) 2009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR TOTAL ARTIFICIAL HEARTS AS A BRIDGE TO TRANSPLANT OR AS A PERMANENT DESTINATION THERAPY, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. B. SLIN 2009 AA WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE BASIC CONTRACT AND EXERCISED BY MODIFICATION P00034 FOR OPTION PERIOD 2. C. A TOTAL OF $20,436.02 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORDER 0021 USING FY 2013 FUNDING AND IS ACCOMPLISHED UNDER OPTION PERIOD 2. D. ALL REMAINING TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2013-02-13$20,436
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0022 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 2009-13-04, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) 2009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC TARGETING SYSTEM (CALYPSO 4-D LOCALIZATION SYSTEM)(CALYPSO) WITH IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF CANCER, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. B. SLIN 2009 AA WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE BASIC CONTRACT AND EXERCISED BY MODIFICATION P00034 FOR OPTION PERIOD 2. C. A TOTAL OF $20,436.02 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORDER 0022 USING FY 2013 FUNDING AND IS ACCOMPLISHED UNDER OPTION PERIOD 2. D. ALL REMAINING TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2013-02-13$20,436
- Department of DefenseIFG::OT::IFG A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0020 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 2009-13-02, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) 2009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF PLAGIOCEPHALY, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. B. SLIN 2009 AA WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE BASIC CONTRACT AND EXERCISED BY MODIFICATION P00034 FOR OPTION PERIOD 2. C. A TOTAL OF $20,436.02 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORDER 0020 USING FY 2013 FUNDING AND IS ACCOMPLISHED UNDER OPTION PERIOD 2. D. ALL REMAINING TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2012-12-11$20,436
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0019 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED BY TASK ORDER 2009-13-01, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) 2009AA. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS THERAPY FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. B. SLIN 2009 AA WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE BASIC CONTRACT AND EXERCISED BY MODIFICATION P00034 FOR OPTION PERIOD 2. C. A TOTAL OF $20,436.02 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORDER 0019 USING FY 2013 FUNDING AND IS ACCOMPLISHED UNDER OPTION PERIOD 2. D. ALL REMAINING TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2012-10-30$20,436
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0015 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDER 1009-12-06, ASSIGNED TO SUBCONTRACT LINE ITEM (SLIN) NUMBER 1009AE. THIS SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF CANCER TYPE ID, AS DESCRIBED ON THE TASK ORDER ON PAGE 3 OF THIS DOCUMENT. B. A TOTAL OF $19,840.92 IS OBLIGATED BY DELIVERY ORDER 0015 USING FY 2012 FUNDING DURING OPTION PERIOD 1. C. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.contract · Last action 2012-03-22$19,841
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0007 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN TASK ORDER 1009-11-02, ASSIGNED TO SLIN 1009AA. THE SLIN PROVIDES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ONE SHORT TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) SCANNING FOR THE RESTAGING AND MONITORING OF LEIMYOSARCOMA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE TASK ORDER ON PAGE 3 OF THIS DOCUMENT. B. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.contract · Last action 2011-06-28$19,841
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0012 IS ORDER AND FUND THE SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS TO CONDUCT A MEDICAL EXAMINATION AND REVIEW MEDICAL RECORDS TO DETERMINE A BENEFICIARY S ENTITLEMENT TO SKILLED NURSING FACILITY (SNF) BENEFITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-20$12,800
- Department of Health and Human ServicesMR OF DME CLAIMS DONE BY CERTcontract · Last action 2008-05-05$9,848
- Department of Defense11;10D01;15411 WITNESS APPEARANCE WHITE A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0008 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REGARDING MAGGIE WHITE (HEARING NO. AH101712) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-17$5,982
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0027 IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SERVICES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. (CLIN) 3015 - MEETING ATTENDANCE, AS MODIFIED BY MODIFICATION P00090.contract · Last action 2015-06-03$4,996
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0011 IS TO ORDER AND FUND THE SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING, HEARING NO. AH110759, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-20$4,821
- Department of DefenseALL QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED; UNIT PRICE SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL QUANTITIES, WHETHER HIGHER OR LOWER THAN ESTIMATED. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS TASK ORDER. A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0003 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER, DR. STEPHEN EVANS, AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REGARDING MR. JACK WALLACE (HEARING NO. AH090282) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-16$4,169
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0005 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REGARDING MR. JOHN GEROSKI (HEARING NO. 100393) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-16$3,207
- Department of DefenseALL QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED; UNIT PRICE SHALL BE APPLICABLE, WHETHER HIGHER OR LOWER THAN ESTIMATED. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS TASK ORDER. A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0004 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REGARDING MR. MITCHELL MAZUR (HEARING NO. 100294) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-16$2,878
- Department of DefenseIGF::OT::IGF A. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0029 IS TO ORDER AND FUND SERVICES OF A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT WITNESS AS A PEER REVIEWER SUPPORTING DHA HEALTH AFFAIRS APPEALS AND HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL IN HEARING NO. AH130837 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2015-07-31$2,522
- Department of DefenseA. THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER 0009 IS TO ORDER AND FUND THE SERVICES OF A PEER REVIEWER AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN THE TMA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, SECTION J, ATTACHMENT J-6, PART 2.contract · Last action 2013-05-17$2,386
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 541611 - ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES. Last action: 2025-02-25. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. is one of 1 establishments rolled up under the parent organization KEPRO.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of KEPRO across all 1 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in computing infrastructure providers, data processing, web hosting, and related services within PA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- Precyse Solutions, LLCWayne — 1 federal enforcement record
- CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT, LLCHARRISBURG — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All KEPRO locationsParent rollup
- Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related ServicesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in PAState-wide enforcement data
- Computing Infrastructure Providers, in PAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup KEPRO.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.'s OSHA violation history?
- Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. has no OSHA inspections on record.
- How does Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc. operates in the computing infrastructure providers, data processing, web hosting, and related services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.3. Keystone Peer Review Organization, Inc.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.33 compared to an industry average of 0.1.