Skip to main content

Establishment profile

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP

1800 E PLEASANT ST, SPRINGFIELD, OH, 45505
326112Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
EIN 832585339

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
3
over 4 years
Violations
8
$63,762 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations · 3 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 4 years of recorded history, with $63,762 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 62nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 784 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 65th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 10 months ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
3
0.8 / yr · last 4 yrs
Violations
8
2.0 / yr
Penalties
$63,762
$7,970 avg / violation
38% serious62% other
Inspection trigger · referral
2 of 3
Inspection trigger · follow-up
1 of 3

67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 6 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $63,762 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0122$29,784Jan 2022Mar 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I22$16,989Jan 2022Mar 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I11$8,066Mar 2024Mar 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 D11$8,066Mar 2024Mar 2024
29 CFR 1910.0132 D0211$858Jan 2022Jan 2022
29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I11Jan 2022Jan 2022

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

62nd

Above average violations in NAICS 3261 within OH. Peer group: 784 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
95th
peer median: $5,483
Inspection frequency
65th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
6.5
vs industry
+5.2
TRIR
6.5
vs industry
+4.5

Reported for 60 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.0
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.3
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
6.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Referral
2
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Sep 2021 – Oct 2023

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
2
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Oct 2, 2023Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedHospitalized
Sep 13, 2021Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationMultiple head locationsHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Sep 13, 2021Broken,Broken Bone,Caught In,Cutting,Jaw,Lack of Work Procedures,Leg,Lockout,Lockout/Tagout,Machine Guarding,Machine operator,Manufacturing,Pelvis,Plastic,Plastic Mfg,Production Line,Rib,Roll,Roller--Mach/Part,Rolling,Shear,Skull,Tarp,Unsafe Position,Walking Surface,Work Station,Work Surface11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
10 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 10 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP
1800 E PLEASANT ST. · SPRINGFIELD, OH, 45505
AirNo Violation Identified00View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-08-06Follow-up0$0
2023-10-11Referral41$48,393
2021-09-17Referral42$15,369

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in plastics packaging film and sheet (including laminated) manufacturing within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP's OSHA violation history?
INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $63,762 in total penalties.
How does INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP's safety record compare to its industry?
INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP operates in the plastics packaging film and sheet (including laminated) manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2. INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP's self-reported DART rate is 6.47 compared to an industry average of 1.3.