Establishment profile
HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY
603 NEW PARK AVENUE, WEST HARTFORD, CT, 06110
332813 — Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
EIN 060638792
Summary
HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY has accumulated 116 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 53 years of recorded history, with $121,425 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 127 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 97th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 37 citations in this view · $72,290 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 3 | 3 | $5,187 | Apr 1986 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 3 | 3 | $2,186 | Dec 1972 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 3 | 2 | $835 | Apr 1986 | May 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 3 | 3 | — | Apr 1986 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0332 B01 | 2 | 2 | $6,250 | May 2010 | Aug 2020 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 A08 | 2 | 2 | $1,290 | May 2010 | Jun 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E01 I | 2 | 2 | $500 | Apr 1986 | May 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I | 2 | 2 | $500 | Dec 1972 | May 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0094 D09 I | 2 | 2 | $480 | Aug 1978 | Jan 1980 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0094 D09 VII | 2 | 2 | $360 | Jan 1980 | Apr 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E03 I | 2 | 2 | — | Apr 1986 | May 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 2 | 2 | — | Dec 1972 | Apr 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0094 D09 IV | 2 | 2 | — | Aug 1978 | Jan 1980 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1026 C | 1 | 1 | $13,000 | Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1026 G02 | 1 | 1 | $13,000 | Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1026 H02 I | 1 | 1 | $9,000 | Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0124 G02 | 1 | 1 | $5,390 | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 B05 I | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0332 B02 | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Aug 2020 | Aug 2020 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C03 | 1 | 1 | $4,312 | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3328 within CT. Peer group: 127 employers. This establishment has 116 OSHA violations; peer median is 9.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 104 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jul 2020
Most frequent event: Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2020 | Fall on same level due to tripping over an object | Hip(s) | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | Complaint | 7 | 5 | $40,000 | |
| 2020-06-12 | Referral | 5 | 5 | $10,000 | |
| 2013-05-30 | Complaint | 7 | 7 | $10,290 | |
| 2013-05-30 | Complaint | 15 | 8 | $40,425 | |
| 2009-12-08 | Planned | 43 | 34 | $18,700 | |
| 1986-02-12 | Planned | 18 | 1 | $210 | |
| 1980-01-07 | Complaint | 6 | 1 | $360 | |
| 1978-07-31 | Complaint | 8 | 7 | $1,380 | |
| 1972-11-20 | Planned | 7 | — | $60 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SEIDELWATERBURY — 3 federal enforcement records
- PAPE ELECTROPLATING COMPANY, LLCNEW BRITAIN — 2 federal enforcement records
- CRC CHROME CORPORATIONMERIDEN — 2 federal enforcement records
- RAYCO METAL FINISHINGMIDDLETOWN — 2 federal enforcement records
- NATIONAL CHROMIUM COMPANY, INC.PUTNAM — 2 federal enforcement records
- SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICATHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- WHYCO FINISHING TECHNOLOGIES, LLCTHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- J.H. METAL FINISHING INC.NEW BRITAIN — 2 federal enforcement records
- COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.NEWINGTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- UNIMETAL SURFACE FINISHING, LLCTHOMASTON — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 116 violations and $121,425 in total penalties.
- How does HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY operates in the electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1. HAR-CONN CHROME COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 2.12 compared to an industry average of 2.3.