Skip to main content

Establishment profile

FULL VISION, INC.

3017 FULL VISION DRIVE, NEWTON, KS, 67114
333111Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
11
over 52 years
Violations
73
$3,910 in penalties
Penalties
$3,910
$54 avg
Accident investigations on record
3 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

FULL VISION, INC. has accumulated 73 OSHA violations across 11 inspections over 52 years of recorded history, with $3,910 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 91 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 96th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FULL VISION, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NHTSA vehicle recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or CPSC product recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
11
0.2 / yr · last 52 yrs
Violations
73
1.4 / yr
Penalties
$3,910
$54 avg / violation
60% serious40% other
Inspection trigger · planned
6 of 11
Inspection trigger · complaint
3 of 11

55% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 27 citations in this view · $3,910 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
5A000141$80Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0122$110Oct 1973Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0107 I0822Oct 1973Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 01101421Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0107 J0322Oct 1973Mar 1981
29 CFR 1904.0039 A0211$2,377May 2017May 2017
29 CFR 1910.0178 P0111$558Apr 2025Apr 2025
29 CFR 1910.1000 B0111$160Mar 1978Mar 1978
29 CFR 1910.0219 B0111$100Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$100Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0107 C0611$80Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 01102211$80Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0252 B03 II11$80Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0217 B03 I11$80Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$45Oct 1973Oct 1973
29 CFR 1910.0252 F02 IC011$30Oct 1973Oct 1973
29 CFR 1910.0242 B11$30Oct 1973Oct 1973
29 CFR 1910.0178 A0611Apr 2025Apr 2025
29 CFR 1910.0027 D0311Mar 1981Mar 1981
29 CFR 1910.0213 B0311Mar 1981Mar 1981

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3331 within KS. Peer group: 91 employers. This establishment has 73 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
53rd
peer median: $3,400
Inspection frequency
96th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
3.3
vs industry
+0.8
TRIR
8.8
vs industry
+4.4

Reported for 82 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
8.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
6
Complaint
3
Referral
1
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Mar 2017 – Aug 2017

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
0
Amputations
2
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Aug 23, 2017Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Mar 24, 2017Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipmentFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Apr 24, 2017Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Crushed,Finger1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
1 year ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
FULL VISION INC
3017 FULL VISION DR. · NEWTON, KS, 67114
WaterRCRATRINo Violation Identified00Jun 2019View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for FULL VISION, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

NHTSA vehicle & equipment recalls

Total campaigns
1
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units affected
6

Most-recalled component: STRUCTURE:BODY:BUMPERS. Most recent campaign: 2021-04-29. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, matched on manufacturer name.

NHTSA campaign roster

Every NHTSA recall campaign issued for this manufacturer, most-recent first. Component column shows the primary system cited (airbags, brakes, electrical, fuel system, etc.). FMVSS column shows the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard cited, if any. Potentially affected = NHTSA’s estimate of vehicles in the recall scope. 1 campaign shown · 6 units potentially affected · 1 distinct components.

CampaignDateComponentVehiclesFMVSSAffected
21E037000Apr 2021STRUCTURE:BODY:BUMPERSFULL VISION/ ROGERS BROS.2236

Source: NHTSA recall database. Each campaign typically covers multiple model years and trims; the Vehicles column shows the distinct makes affected (model lists collapse in this view to keep the row scannable).

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$0
Obligated (all-time)
$5K
Awards
2
Top agency
Department of Defense
$5K
Largest awards
  • Department of Defense
    TREADMILL 25% INCLINE
    contract · Last action 2008-07-09
    $5,015
  • Department of Defense
    SUPPLY - TREADMILL
    contract · Last action 2008-10-27
    $-100

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 541380 - TESTING LABORATORIES. Last action: 2008-10-27. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-01-29Complaint2$558
2025-01-22Planned0$0
2021-10-06Complaint0$0
2017-04-12Referral1$2,377
2002-01-29Planned0$0
1985-01-15Planned0$0
1981-01-22Complaint5236$680
1978-12-15Follow-up0$0
1977-12-27Planned98$160
1973-10-16Planned1$30
1973-10-02Planned8$105

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in farm machinery and equipment manufacturing within KS, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FULL VISION, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FULL VISION, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
FULL VISION, INC. has 11 OSHA inspections on record with 73 violations and $3,910 in total penalties.
How does FULL VISION, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
FULL VISION, INC. operates in the farm machinery and equipment manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.4. FULL VISION, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 3.31 compared to an industry average of 2.5.