Skip to main content

Establishment profile

FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY

2629 PENN AVENUE, HATFIELD, PA, 19440
Operated by Fluid Energy Processing
325998All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing
EIN 231457323

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
18
over 39 years
Violations
54
$7,959 in penalties
Penalties
$7,959
$147 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
11 National Emphasis Program inspections · 3 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY has accumulated 54 OSHA violations across 18 inspections over 39 years of recorded history, with $7,959 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 116 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 months ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
18
0.5 / yr · last 39 yrs
Violations
54
1.4 / yr
Penalties
$7,959
$147 avg / violation
63% serious37% other
Inspection trigger · planned
9 of 18
Inspection trigger · complaint
6 of 18

61% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 7 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $6,759 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1904.0002 A22$60Jun 1987Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I22Nov 2013Jan 2026
29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I22Sep 1990Aug 1994
29 CFR 1910.0146 C07 III11$1,785Nov 2013Nov 2013
29 CFR 1910.0307 B11$875Aug 1994Aug 1994
29 CFR 1910.0303 B0111$675May 2000May 2000
29 CFR 1910.1000 A0211$350May 2005May 2005
29 CFR 1910.0095 B0111$350Nov 1994Nov 1994
29 CFR 1910.0023 D01 III11$344May 2000May 2000
29 CFR 1910.0095 I0511$260Nov 1994Nov 1994
29 CFR 1910.1200 H11$260Jun 1987Jun 1987
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$240Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0305 B0111$210Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0213 H0111$210Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0111$200Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111$200Jun 1987Jun 1987
29 CFR 1910.1200 G0511$200Jun 1987Jun 1987
29 CFR 1910.0106 E06 II11$180Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0178 C02 XII11$180Sep 1990Sep 1990
29 CFR 1910.0178 L11$180Sep 1990Sep 1990

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

99th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3259 within PA. Peer group: 116 employers. This establishment has 54 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
77th
peer median: $2,520
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.7
vs industry
+1.9
TRIR
5.4
vs industry
+4.0

Reported for 52 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
5.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
9
Complaint
6
Referral
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 11 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in PA — for Fluid Energy Processing, not this location alone

Total cases
1
Unfair labor practice
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Fluid Energy Processing locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
04-CA-076460Unfair labor practiceMar 2012Apr 2012ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-07-24Complaint2$0
2025-07-24Complaint1$0
2022-07-19Complaint2$0
2013-07-25Planned31$1,785
2013-07-25Programmed Related0$0
2008-10-28Planned0$0
2007-02-05Monitoring0$0
2007-01-17Planned0$0
2004-12-10Referral22$350
2004-07-30Planned1$0
2003-07-10Planned0$0
2002-12-10Planned0$0
2000-05-02Planned0$0
2000-05-02Planned53$1,019
1994-08-18Complaint21$875
1994-08-18Complaint54$610
1990-07-18Referral2620$2,660
1987-05-05Complaint53$660

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY is one of 1 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Fluid Energy Processing.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Fluid Energy Processing across all 1 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in all other miscellaneous chemical product and preparation manufacturing within PA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Fluid Energy Processing.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY has 18 OSHA inspections on record with 54 violations and $7,959 in total penalties.
How does FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY operates in the all other miscellaneous chemical product and preparation manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.4. FLUID ENERGY PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 2.7 compared to an industry average of 0.8.