Establishment profile
ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
175 S SATELLITE ROAD, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT, 06074
332710 — Machine Shops
EIN 061069740
Summary
ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. has accumulated 15 OSHA violations across 1 inspection over 21 years of recorded history, with $2,400 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 76th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 197 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 21 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 15 distinct standards shown · 15 citations in this view · $2,400 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $375 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 1 | 1 | $300 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L | 1 | 1 | $300 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C01 | 1 | 1 | $300 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0038 A01 | 1 | 1 | $225 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A02 | 1 | 1 | $225 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | $225 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0184 D | 1 | 1 | $225 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 B | 1 | 1 | $225 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 V | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0184 I09 III | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E03 I | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0002 A | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3327 within CT. Peer group: 197 employers. This establishment has 15 OSHA violations; peer median is 7.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 43 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 21+ years. Most recent activity: 21 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CT — for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-CA-317116 | Unfair labor practice | May 2023 | Aug 2023 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESTEEM MANUFACTURING CORP 175 S SATELLITE RD · SOUTH WINDSOR, CT, 06074 | RCRA | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-03-03 | Planned | 15 | 13 | $2,400 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in machine shops within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- PARASON MACHINE, INC.DEEP RIVER — 2 federal enforcement records
- INDUSTRIAL SAWS, INC.TORRINGTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- FORREST MACHINE, INC.ROCKY HILL — 1 federal enforcement record
- R.M. MACHINE, INC.TORRINGTON — 1 federal enforcement record
- CANDLEWOOD TOOL AND MACHINE SHOP, INC.GAYLORDSVILLE — 1 federal enforcement record
- GREER MANUFACTURING, INC.PROSPECT — 1 federal enforcement record
- METALPRO, INC.OLD SAYBROOK — 1 federal enforcement record
- REED AND STEFANOW MACHINE AND TOOL COMPANY, INC.BRISTOL — 1 federal enforcement record
- BARTLEY MFG. COMPANY, INC.WATERBURY — 1 federal enforcement record
- E & E TOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANYHARWINTON — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Machine ShopsAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Machine Shops in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 15 violations and $2,400 in total penalties.
- How does ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. operates in the machine shops industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.7. ESTEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.5.