Establishment profile
ELECTROLUX INC
340 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD., PINEY FLATS, TN, 37686
Operated by Electrolux · 1 of 8 establishments
Summary
ELECTROLUX INC has accumulated 20 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 35 years of recorded history, with $3,980 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 98th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 23,339 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 86th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 29 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
ELECTROLUX INC appears in OSHA workplace safety, NLRB labor relations, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view · $3,980 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | $405 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0133 A06 | 1 | 1 | $320 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 E05 | 1 | 1 | $320 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 F02 II | 1 | 1 | $320 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0252 A02 IIB | 1 | 1 | $245 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 F02 IV | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 9000.704 A00001 | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 9000.501 | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 B01 | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 9000.609 | 1 | 1 | $210 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 IVA | 1 | 1 | $175 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E06 I | 1 | 1 | $175 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E09 III | 1 | 1 | $175 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F04 | 1 | 1 | $175 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 9001.003 | 1 | 1 | $100 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 9001.005 | 1 | 1 | $100 | May 1991 | May 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C01 | 1 | 1 | — | Apr 1997 | Apr 1997 |
| 29 CFR 9001.102 A | 1 | 1 | — | May 1991 | May 1991 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer. Peer group: 23,339 employers. This establishment has 20 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 29+ years. Most recent activity: 29 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in TN — for Electrolux, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Electrolux locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 5 cases · 4 ULP · 1 representation
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-CA-223509 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2018 | Sep 2018 | Closed | Region 15, New Orleans, Louisiana |
| 15-CA-222125 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2018 | Sep 2018 | Closed | Region 15, New Orleans, Louisiana |
| 10-CA-214527 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2018 | Mar 2018 | Closed | Region 10, Atlanta, Georgia |
| 15-CA-207396 | Unfair labor practice | Oct 2017 | Jan 2018 | Closed | Region 15, New Orleans, Louisiana |
| 10-RC-172260 | Representation election | Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | Closed | Region 10, Atlanta, Georgia |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ELECTROLUX INC. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
CPSC product recalls
Top hazard: Plastic control knobs with a black shaft on the cooktop can crack or break during use, posing a risk of gas leak, fire hazard.. Most recent recall: 2024-05-16. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.
CPSC recall roster
Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 1 recall shown · 1 distinct hazard categories.
| Recall | Date | Hazards | Units | CPSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kenmore Electric Ranges Recalled by Electrolux Due to Electrical Shock Hazard #15084 | Feb 2015 | The heating element can fail to properly adhere to the cooktop, posing an electrical shock hazard to consumers. | — | View → |
Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997-03-21 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1992-05-08 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-04-10 | Planned | 19 | 9 | $3,980 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
ELECTROLUX INC is one of 8 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Electrolux.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Electrolux across all 8 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Electrolux, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- ElectroluxMemphis, TN — 2 federal enforcement records
- ELECTROLUX INCJACKSON, TN — 1 federal enforcement record
- ELECTROLUX INCUNION CITY, TN — 1 federal enforcement record
- ELECTROLUX CORPORATIONGASTONIA, NC — 1 federal enforcement record
- ELECTROLUX, INC.LUMBERTON, NC — 1 federal enforcement record
- ELECTROLUX CORPROCKY MOUNT, NC — 1 federal enforcement record
- ELECTROLUX, INC.BURLINGTON, NC — 0 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All Electrolux locationsParent rollup
- Employers in TNState-wide enforcement data
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ELECTROLUX INC from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Electrolux, which operates 8 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is ELECTROLUX INC's OSHA violation history?
- ELECTROLUX INC has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 20 violations and $3,980 in total penalties.