Establishment profile
CITY OF FLINT
1101 S SAGINAW ST, FLINT, MI, 48502
Operated by City of Flint · 1 of 6 establishments
921110 — Executive Offices
Summary
CITY OF FLINT has accumulated 2 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 10 years of recorded history, with $1,750 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 32nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 663 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 68th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
CITY OF FLINT appears in OSHA workplace safety and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 2 citations in this view · $1,750 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.1001 J03 I | 1 | 1 | $1,750 | May 2016 | May 2016 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1001 J03 III | 1 | 1 | — | May 2016 | May 2016 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Below average violations in NAICS 9211 within MI. Peer group: 663 employers. This establishment has 2 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 488 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility · 1 marked inactive.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CITY OF FLINT 310 E 5TH ST · FLINT, MI, 48502 | RCRA | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | — | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for CITY OF FLINT. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentDEMOLITION AND REVITALIZATION OF SEVERELY DISTRESSED PUBLIC HOUSINGassistance · Last action 2018-09-20$30,000,000
- Department of Health and Human ServicesCITY OF FLINT RESILIENCY IN COMMUNITIES AFTER STRESS AND TRAUMA (RECAST) PROJECT - THE CITY OF FLINT (MICHIGAN) RESILIENCY IN COMMUNITIES AFTER STRESS AND TRAUMA (RECAST) PROJECT AIMS TO ASSIST HIGH-RISK YOUTH AND FAMILIES TO PROMOTE RESILIENCE AND EQUITY IN A COMMUNITY EXPERIENCING RELENTLESS TRAUMA AND RECENT CIVIL UNREST. INDIVIDUALS IN FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH THE TRAUMA OF THE FLINT WATER CRISIS (FWC) SINCE 2014. THE FWC IS A SLOW DISASTER WITH A SLOW RECOVERY. THE COMMUNITY RECENTLY ERUPTED IN CIVIL UNREST IN RESPONSE TO THE RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT OF A $600 MILLION FWC CIVIL SETTLEMENT AS IT IS LIKELY TO LEAVE OUT MANY RESIDENTS DUE TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE SETTLEMENT, AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIRED TO ACCESS FUNDS. UNPRECEDENTED CHARGES OF NINE MICHIGAN OFFICIALS IN CONNECTION TO THE FWC, INCLUDING FORMER GOVERNOR RICK SNYDER, WAS EXPECTED TO OFFER A SENSE OF VALIDATION FOR RESIDENTS. HOWEVER, THE DISGUSTED AND DISENFRANCHISED COMMUNITY HAD TO WITHSTAND ANOTHER CRUSHING BLOW, WHEN RESIDENTS LEARNED THAT DEFENDANTS WERE CHARGED WITH MISDEMEANOR CRIMES, WHICH EVEN AT MAXIMUM PENALTY WILL ONLY RESULT IN MINIMUM FINES FOR CITY-WIDE TRAUMA. THE FLINT RECAST PROJECT WILL BE LED BY THE CITY OF FLINT. A CURRENT RECAST GRANTEE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH SAMHSA. THE SPECIFIC GOALS OF THE NEW FLINT RECAST PROJECT INCLUDE: (1) INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF TRAUMA-INFORMED PRACTICES AND STRENGTHEN THE INTEGRATION OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES TO IMPROVE EQUITABLE ACCESS; (2) ESTABLISH A CO-LEARNING AND EMPOWERING PROCESS TO ADDRESS RACIAL AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY IN THE CITY OF FLINT COMMUNITY INCLUSIVE OF PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES; (3) INCREASE CAPACITY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE AND COMMUNITY-BASED YOUTH ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMS THROUGH COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS TO PROMOTE POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT; AND (4) IMPROVE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES AND POLICIES BY ALIGNING AND EXPANDING INITIATIVES AIMED AT BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY. TO REACH THESE GOALS, EVIDENCE-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION, COMMUNITY YOUTH ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMS, AS WELL AS LINKAGES TO TRAUMA-INFORMED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. KEY ACTIVITIES INCLUDE THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE MULTI-SECTOR FLINT RECAST COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD ORGANIZATIONS, THE FLINT COMMUNITY ADVISORY TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC SAFETY, AS WELL AS IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAUMA-INFORMED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES AND YOUTH ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMS TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF HIGH-RISK YOUTH, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS. THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FLINT RECAST PROJECT WILL LEAD TO INCREASE RESILIENCE AND EQUITY IN THE FLINT, MICHIGAN COMMUNITY.assistance · Last action 2026-01-15$4,999,853
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2023-08-24$4,019,558
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2022-09-13$4,005,344
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-09-10$3,984,460
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-09-11$3,686,126
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-08-24$2,830,392
- Department of JusticeTHE CITY OF FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE GENESEE COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE AND THE YWCA OF GREATER FLINT, REQUESTS CONTINUED SUPPORT TO IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO UNSUBMITTED SEXUAL ASSAULT KITS (SAKS) IN THE CITY OF FLINT WITH A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM AND TO OPTIMIZE VICTIM-CENTERED SERVICES THAT PROMOTE JUSTICE AND HEALING. THIS FUNDING IS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURE THAT SAKS AND CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT CASES RESULTING FROM SAKS RECEIVE EXPERT ATTENTION, PRIORITIZATION, EXPEDIENCY AND SITE COORDINATION. THE CITY OF FLINT HAS EXPERIENCED SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL HARDSHIP OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES, WHICH LED TO BACKLOGS OF SAKS AND AN EXORBITANT NUMBER OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES. THIS PLACES ENORMOUS PRESSURE ON DOWNSIZED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE QUICKLY WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING NEW CASES. ADDITIONAL FUNDING AND STAFFING HAS BECOME ESSENTIAL TO ADDRESS SAKS AND TO ENSURE JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES. THE CITY OF FLINT HAS TESTED 770 SAKS WITH THE FUNDING OF BJA AND DOJ TO HELP IDENTIFY POTENTIAL SUSPECTS. SAKS THAT HAVE SUSPECTS IDENTIFIED WILL REQUIRE SUBSEQUENT FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION, AND HOLISTIC SUPPORT FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT (CSC). AND SOME SAKS WILL BE IDENTIFIED AND BENEFIT FROM FORENSIC GENETIC GENEALOGY TESTING AND HELP LEAD TO SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION. THE CITY OF FLINT SEXUAL ASSAULT KIT INITIATIVE (SAKI) IS COMMITTED TO ENSURING JUSTICE FOR THESE CASES. THERE IS A GREAT NEED FOR FUNDED TIME AND SUPPORT TO CONTINUE INVESTIGATIONS AS INITIAL SAK TESTING IS BEING COMPLETED, MONITORED, AND TO ENSURE THAT VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT ARE WELL-SUPPORTED DURING THE PROCESS. UNDER THE PROPOSED PROJECT, THE CITY OF FLINT SAKI UNIT WITH THE HELP OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM, WILL MODIFY AND EXPAND THE COMPREHENSIVE TRACKING OF ALL SAKS INCLUDING EXPANDING TO COLD CASES FROM 2015-2022. AN ESTIMATED 20 CASES WILL BE CLOSED IN THREE YEARS, WHILE DEVOTING IMPORTANT CARE AND SUPPORT TO VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE CITY OF FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY. AS THE LEAD AGENCY, THE CITY OF FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT SAKI UNIT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INVESTIGATIONS AND THE OVERALL TECHNICAL, PROGRAMMATIC, AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OF THE GRANT. THE GENESEE COUNTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR FOR THE SAKI UNIT WILL HANDLE COLD CASE CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT PROSECUTIONS AND THE VICTIM ADVOCATE WITH THE YWCA, WILL WORK WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS.assistance · Last action 2025-05-06$2,500,000
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentLEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD CONTROL IN PRIVATELY-OWNED HOUSINGassistance · Last action 2021-08-20$2,283,960
- Department of JusticePROJECT ABSTRACT PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT: THE CITY OF FLINT "COF" (MICHIGAN) COMMUNITY BASED VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION INITIATIVE (CVIPI) AIMS TO IMPLEMENT EVIDENCE-INFORMED STRATEGIES TO REDUCE AND PREVENT VIOLENT CRIME IN THE "COF". VIOLENT CRIME, SPECIFICALLY GUN VIOLENCE, CONTINUES TO BE A MAJOR ISSUE AFFECTING THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY THUS ERODING PUBLIC HEALTH, CAUSING ECONOMIC DISRUPTION, AND CONTRIBUTING TO LASTING INDIVIDUAL AND COMMUNITY TRAUMAS. ON JULY 23, 2021, THE “COF” MAYOR DECLARED A STATE OF EMERGENCY DUE TO THE RISING GUN VIOLENCE IN THE CITY. PRIMARY ACTIVITIES: THE FLINT (CVIPI) PROJECT WILL BE LED BY THE “COF”. A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM (MDT) OF STAKEHOLDERS WILL BE INVOLVED IN THE FORMING, PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CVIPI, THIS WILL INCLUDE, MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS, COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS, FAITH BASED ORGANIZATIONS, LAW ENFORCEMENT, VICTIM ADVOCATES, SERVICE PROVIDERS, HOSPITAL AND OTHER HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, RESEARCHERS AND COMMUNITY RESIDENTS AND OTHER RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS. WHILE WORKING COLLABORATIVELY, THE MDT WILL ENSURE THAT THE KEY PRINCIPLES OF THIS SOLICITATION ARE AT THE FOREFRONT OF ALL PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION.EXPECTED OUTCOMES: AS A RESULT OF ACTIVITIES, IT IS EXPECTED THERE WILL BE A REDUCTION IN VIOLENCE AS REPORTED VIA INDIVIDUAL SURVEYS AND POLICE INCIDENT DATA. IT IS EXPECTED THAT DURING THE FIRST 6 - 9 MONTHS OF THIS AWARD, THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND SUBSEQUENT STRATEGIC PLAN WILL SHAPE ANY EXPECTED OUTCOMES, HOWEVER, THE AIM IS TO SEE AN OVERALL REDUCTION OF VIOLENCE IN THE "COF" BY 15% - 20% WITH A REDUCTION OF GUN RELATED HOMICIDES BY 10% - 15%. SERVICE AREA: FLINT HAS EXPERIENCED SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC AND TRAUMATIC HARDSHIPS OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES INCLUDING THE FLINT LEAD WATER EMERGENCY (AKA THE ‘FLINT WATER CRISIS’) ECONOMIC RECESSION , AND MOST RECENTLY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. RESEARCH SHOWS THAT A MANIFEST EFFECT OF HARDSHIPS SUCH AS THESE IS AN INCREASE IN CRIME. FOR INSTANCE, CONSISTENT EXPOSURE TO LEAD–PARTICULARLY DURING VULNERABLE PERIODS SUCH AS BEFORE AGE TWO–IS CORRELATED WITH INCREASED LIKELIHOOD OF NEGATIVE OUTCOMES INCLUDING VIOLENT CRIME. SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCHERS ARGUE THIS AS BEING AN ISSUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM DUE TO CERTAIN POPULATIONS, IN PARTICULAR, BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICANS IN URBAN AREAS, BEING DISPROPORTIONATELY EXPOSED TO HIGHER LEAD LEVELS. ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY MAKES UP THE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION OF THE "COF", AT 54%.assistance · Last action 2025-08-13$1,500,000
- Small Business AdministrationAWARD TYPE: PROJECT GRANT; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY SUPPORT AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH PANDEMIC RELIEF PROGRAMS AND RECOVERY SERVICES TO SMALL BUSINESSES.; DELIVERABLES: GRANTEES WILL PROVIDE REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS TOWARD STATED GOALS TO SBA ON A QUARTERLY BASIS.; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: INCREASE AWARENESS OF AND PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAMS OF THE U.S SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: SMALL BUSINESSES AND ENTREPRENEURS THAT FALL INTO A HISTORICALLY UNDERSERVED CATEGORY, INCLUDING MINORITY ENTREPRENEURS (BLACK, INDIGENOUS, AND PEOPLE OF COLOR), ENTREPRENEURS WITH DISABILITIES, LGBTQ ENTREPRENEURS, RURAL ENTREPRENEURS; VETERANS AND MILITARY ENTREPRENEURS (INCLUDING SPOUSES), WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS, INNOVATIVE STARTUPS, MICRO BUSINESSES, AND SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESSES; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: GRANTEES (HUBS) AND THEIR CONTRACTORS (SPOKES) WILL PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY SUPPORT AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH PANDEMIC RELIEF PROGRAMS AND RECOVERY SERVICES TO SMALL BUSINESSES. THIS SUPPORT TAKES THE FORM OF 1:1 COUNSELING AND GROUP TRAININGS.assistance · Last action 2021-11-15$1,000,000
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentHOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAMassistance · Last action 2021-11-18$800,548
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) PROVIDES NEED-BASED FORMULA GRANTS TO STATES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE USED TO FUND ACTIVITIES INCLUDING BUILDING, BUYING, AND/OR REHABILITATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR RENT OR HOMEOWNERSHIP OR PROVIDING DIRECT RENTAL ASSISTANCE TO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE. THE HOME PROGRAM WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1990 THROUGH TITLE II OF THE CRANSTON-GONZALEZ NATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT (NAHA). SINCE ITS INCEPTION, THE HOME PROGRAM HAS DISTRIBUTED MORE THAN $40 BILLION TO CREATE OVER 1,374,000 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND PROVIDE TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE TO MORE THAN 405,000 HOUSEHOLDS THROUGHOUT THE NATION. HOME FUNDS ARE APPROPRIATED ANNUALLY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD), WHICH IN TURN DISTRIBUTES THE FUNDS TO STATES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT QUALIFY AS PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. FORTY PERCENT OF HOME FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED TO STATES AND 60 PERCENT ARE ALLOCATED TO LOCALITIES. CURRENT HOME AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: HOME FUNDS ARE USED TO FINANCE A WIDE VARIETY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES INCLUDING REHABILITATION OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING; ASSISTANCE TO HOMEBUYERS; ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION, OR CONSTRUCTION OF RENTAL HOUSING; AND TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE. PROJECTS THAT USE HOME FUNDING MUST MEET CERTAIN INCOME TARGETING AND AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS. HOME ASSISTED HOUSING MUST ALSO MEET CERTAIN DEFINITIONS OF AFFORDABILITY AND MUST CONTINUE TO REMAIN AFFORDABLE TO LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS FOR 5, 10, 15, OR 20 YEARS DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF ACTIVITY FOR WHICH FUNDS ARE USED AND THE AMOUNT OF HOME FUNDING CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROJECT. PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS (PJS) CAN UNDERTAKE HOME PROJECTS DIRECTLY OR PROVIDE HOME FUNDS TO DEVELOPERS OR OWNERS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR OTHER PARTNERS. HOME FUNDS ARE TYPICALLY PROVIDED AS GRANTS, VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS, LOAN GUARANTEES TO LENDING ORGANIZATIONS, INTEREST RATE SUBSIDIES, OR EQUITY INVESTMENTS.; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: BASED ON THE PRIORITIES IDENTIFIED IN A FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN SUBMITTED TO HUD, PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS USE HOME FUNDS TO ACQUIRE OWNER OR RENTER OCCUPIED HOUSING IN STANDARD CONDITION TO BE OCCUPIED BY LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS; NEWLY CONSTRUCT OR REHABILITATE AFFORDABLE RENTAL OR OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING, PROVIDE HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE TO LOW-INCOME HOMEBUYERS, AND/OR PROVIDE TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE TO LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. BY STATUTE, EACH PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION MUST RESERVE AT LEAST 15 PERCENT OF ITS HOME FUNDING FOR PROJECTS OWNED, DEVELOPED, OR SPONSORED BY COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS (CHDOS). ADDITIONALLY, A PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION MAY USE UP TO 10 PERCENT OF ITS HOME ALLOCATION FOR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION. THE QUANTIFIABLE RESULTS OF THIS PROGRAM CHANGE ON A CONSTANT BASIS. HOWEVER, THEY CAN BE TRACKED VIA THE HOME NATIONAL PRODUCTION REPORT. THIS MONTHLY CUMULATIVE SUMMARY REPORT OF HOME DATA BY FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR (FY) INCLUDES: ALLOCATIONS, COMMITMENTS, DISBURSEMENTS, LEVERAGING RATIOS, LOW-INCOME BENEFIT, COMMITTED FUNDS BY ACTIVITY TYPE, AND HOME COST PER UNIT BY TENURE AND ACTIVITY TYPE. THE MONTHLY REPORT CAN BE REVIEWED AT HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/HOME/HOME-NATIONAL-PRODUCTION-REPORTS/; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: ALL HOME ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS MUST BENEFIT HOUSEHOLDS WITH INCOMES AT OR BELOW 80 PERCENT OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME. ADDITIONALLY, 90 PERCENT OF OCCUPANTS OF HOME ASSISTED RENTAL UNITS AND HOUSEHOLDS THAT RECEIVE TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE MUST HAVE INCOMES AT OR BELOW 60 PERCENT OF AREA MEDIAN INCOME. HOME FUNDS ARE OFTEN USED TO ASSIST PERSONS OR HOUSEHOLDS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-09-11$662,338
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) AUTHORIZES THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) TO MAKE GRANTS TO STATES, UNITS OF GENERAL-PURPOSE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND TERRITORIES FOR THE REHABILITATION OR CONVERSION OF BUILDINGS FOR USE AS EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS, FOR THE PAYMENT OF CERTAIN EXPENSES RELATED TO OPERATING EMERGENCY SHELTERS, FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES RELATED TO EMERGENCY SHELTERS AND STREET OUTREACH FOR THE HOMELESS, AND FOR HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING ASSISTANCE. THE ESG PROGRAM IS A FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM THAT ASSISTS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES TO QUICKLY REGAIN PERMANENT HOUSING STABILITY AFTER EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS OR A HOUSING CRISIS. CURRENT ESG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT HTTPS://WWW.HUD.GOV/PROGRAM_OFFICES/COMM_PLANNING/BUDGET/FY23; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: ESG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR FIVE PROGRAM COMPONENTS: STREET OUTREACH, EMERGENCY SHELTER, HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING ASSISTANCE, AND HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HMIS). FUNDS CAN ALSO BE USED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES. THE FIVE PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND THE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES THAT MAY BE FUNDED UNDER EACH ARE SET FORTH IN 24 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR) 576.101 THROUGH 576.107.; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: WITH ESG PROGRAM FUNDING, COMMUNITIES CAN ENGAGE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES LIVING ON THE STREET, IMPROVE THE NUMBER AND QUALITY OF EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS/FAMILIES, SUPPORT THE OPERATION OF EMERGENCY SHELTERS, PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO SHELTER RESIDENTS, RAPIDLY WORK TO REHOUSE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES AND PREVENT INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES FROM BECOMING HOMELESS.; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS OF THE ESG FUNDS GENERALLY CONSIST OF METROPOLITAN CITIES, URBAN COUNTIES, TERRITORIES, AND STATES, AS DEFINED IN 24 CFR 576.2. THE MINIMUM ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ESG BENEFICIARIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES RELATED TO STREET OUTREACH, BENEFICIARIES MUST MEET THE CRITERIA UNDER PARAGRAPH (1) (I) OF THE “HOMELESS” DEFINITION UNDER 576.2. FOR EMERGENCY SHELTER, BENEFICIARIES MUST MEET THE “HOMELESS” DEFINITION IN 24 CFR 576.2. FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES RELATED TO EMERGENCY SHELTER, BENEFICIARIES MUST BE “HOMELESS” AND STAYING IN AN EMERGENCY SHELTER (WHICH COULD INCLUDE A DAY SHELTER). FOR HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION ASSISTANCE, BENEFICIARIES MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN 24 CFR 576.103PAR. FOR RAPID RE-HOUSING ASSISTANCE, BENEFICIARIES MUST MEET REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN 24 CFR 576.104. FURTHER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA MAY BE ESTABLISHED AT THE LOCAL LEVEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 24 CFR 576.400(E).; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-09-11$353,277
- General Services AdministrationWATER/SEWER SERVICE FOR THE FEDERAL BUILDING, FLINT, MI.contract · Last action 2010-10-14$57,982
- General Services AdministrationWATER/SEWER FOR COURTHOUSE, FLINTcontract · Last action 2009-09-17$11,074
- General Services AdministrationWATER/SEWER SERVICE, 929 STEVENS, FLINT, MIcontract · Last action 2012-01-03$8,836
- General Services AdministrationWATER & SEWERcontract · Last action 2010-03-02$6,075
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 221310 - WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. Last action: 2012-01-03. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-27 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2016-03-28 | Complaint | 2 | 2 | $1,750 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
CITY OF FLINT is one of 6 establishments rolled up under the parent organization City of Flint.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of City of Flint across all 6 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in executive offices within MI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- STRAITS AREA SERVICES INCCHEBOYGAN — 2 federal enforcement records
- VILLAGE OF CHESANINGCHESANING — 1 federal enforcement record
- ROGERS CITY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKSROGERS CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- SAGINAW FLEET MAINTENANCE GARAGESAGINAW — 1 federal enforcement record
- MATTAWAN VILLAGE OFMATTAWAN — 1 federal enforcement record
- CROSWELL CTY OFCROSWELL — 1 federal enforcement record
- RICHMOND FIRE DEPTRICHMOND — 1 federal enforcement record
- BRIDGEPORT UTILITIESBRIDGEPORT — 1 federal enforcement record
- SAGINAW PARKS & FACILITY MANAGEMENTSAGINAW — 1 federal enforcement record
- OTSEGO CTY OFOTSEGO — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by City of Flint, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- CITY OF FLINT FIRE DEPARTMENTFLINT, MI — 1 federal enforcement record
- CITY OF FLINT WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANTFLINT, MI — 1 federal enforcement record
- CITY OF FLINT FIRE DEPARTMENTFLINT, MI — 0 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All City of Flint locationsParent rollup
- Executive OfficesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MIState-wide enforcement data
- Executive Offices in MIIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on CITY OF FLINT from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup City of Flint, which operates 6 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is CITY OF FLINT's OSHA violation history?
- CITY OF FLINT has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 2 violations and $1,750 in total penalties.
- How does CITY OF FLINT's safety record compare to its industry?
- CITY OF FLINT operates in the executive offices industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.2. CITY OF FLINT's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.9.