Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

AT&T, INC.

2315 SALEM ROAD, CONYERS, GA, 30013
Operated by AT&T Inc · 1 of 2,004 establishments
334210 — Telephone Apparatus Manufacturing
EIN 134924710

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 24 years
Violations
3
$1,083 in penalties
Penalties
$1,083
$361 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

AT&T, INC. has accumulated 3 OSHA violations across 1 inspection over 24 years of recorded history, with $1,083 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 59th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 40,386 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 24 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

AT&T, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.0 / yr · last 24 yrs
Violations
3
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$1,083
$361 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 3 distinct standards shown · 3 citations in this view · $1,083 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0036 D0111$1,083Oct 2001Oct 2001
29 CFR 1910.0037 Q0511—Oct 2001Oct 2001
29 CFR 1910.1200 H0111—Oct 2001Oct 2001

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

59th

Above average violations in NAICS 3342 within GA. Peer group: 40,386 employers. This establishment has 3 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
86th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−0.5
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−0.9

Reported for 293 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
0.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Nov 2024

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Fall on same level due to slip or trip

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Nov 6, 2024Fall on same level due to slip or tripHip joint(s)Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
24 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 24+ years. Most recent activity: 24 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for AT&T, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AT&T, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in GA — for AT&T Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
98
Unfair labor practice
98

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other AT&T Inc locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 98 cases · 98 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
10-CA-384403Unfair labor practiceApr 2026—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-365022Unfair labor practiceMay 2025—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-362127Unfair labor practiceMar 2025—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-351141Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Apr 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-349854Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Jun 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-345388Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-341549Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-335370Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Aug 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-324873Unfair labor practiceAug 2023—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-305066Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-291950Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-291903Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-282339Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-282315Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Oct 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-278308Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-260362Unfair labor practiceMay 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-256507Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Apr 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-254575Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-250795Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-250794Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-250726Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
12-CA-248874Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
10-CA-240013Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-236014Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-229552Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-229286Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-226087Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
22-CA-221448Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
10-CA-203940Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-187419Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-169487Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-168063Unfair labor practiceJan 2016Feb 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-164276Unfair labor practiceNov 2015Nov 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-162625Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Jan 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-159436Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-155108Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-151956Unfair labor practiceMay 2015Jul 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-141196Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-119790Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Mar 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-118143Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Feb 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-113724Unfair labor practiceSep 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-088540Unfair labor practiceSep 2012Dec 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-086638Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Nov 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-079894Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Jun 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-076248Unfair labor practiceMar 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-075096Unfair labor practiceFeb 2012Apr 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-073767Unfair labor practiceFeb 2012Feb 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-072927Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Mar 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-071245Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Jan 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-071196Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Mar 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-070225Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Jan 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-068864Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-066007Unfair labor practiceOct 2011Jun 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-064656Unfair labor practiceSep 2011May 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-064563Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Jan 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-063164Unfair labor practiceAug 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-062421Unfair labor practiceAug 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-061817Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Jan 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-060311Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-060260Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-060236Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Jul 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-060106Unfair labor practiceMay 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-060080Unfair labor practiceMay 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038885Unfair labor practiceMar 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038879Unfair labor practiceMar 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038878Unfair labor practiceMar 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038842Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038822Unfair labor practiceFeb 2011Feb 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038791Unfair labor practiceJan 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038783Unfair labor practiceJan 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038739Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Feb 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
12-CA-026837Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Feb 2011ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
10-CA-038529Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Aug 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038522Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038490Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038308Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038290Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038275Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038131Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Nov 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037951Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037897Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Jun 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037837Unfair labor practiceApr 2009May 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037483Unfair labor practiceAug 2008Sep 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037482Unfair labor practiceAug 2008Sep 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037400Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037379Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037350Unfair labor practiceApr 2008May 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037258Unfair labor practiceFeb 2008Mar 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037213Unfair labor practiceJan 2008Jan 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037205Unfair labor practiceJan 2008Feb 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-037012Unfair labor practiceSep 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-036992Unfair labor practiceSep 2007Nov 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-036844Unfair labor practiceMay 2007May 2007ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-036820Unfair labor practiceMay 2007Nov 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-036351Unfair labor practiceJul 2006Mar 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-034964Unfair labor practiceApr 2004Aug 2004ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-034105Unfair labor practiceNov 2002Mar 2005ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-033672Unfair labor practiceApr 2002Jan 2004ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AT&T, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AT&T, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AT&T, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$143K
Obligated (all-time)
$143K
Awards
15
Top agency
Department of the Interior
$128K
Company-wide — AT&T INC. (across 51 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$4.9B
Obligated (all-time)
$5.7B
Awards (all-time)
9,424

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of the Interior$128K
Department of Justice$15K
General Services Administration$0
Environmental Protection Agency$-684.96

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 517110 - WIRED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS. Last action: 2026-03-05. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2001-10-10Complaint3—$1,083

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

AT&T, INC. is one of 2,004 establishments rolled up under the parent organization AT&T Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of AT&T Inc across all 2,004 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by AT&T Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

  • SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONEWICHITA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TSACRAMENTO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T, INC.NORCROSS, GA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TMINNEAPOLIS, MN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&THOUSTON, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT & TSAN RAMON, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TRENO, NV — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TCERRITOS, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T CORP.NASHVILLE, TN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TArlington, TX — 2 federal enforcement records

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AT&T, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup AT&T Inc, which operates 2,004 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is AT&T, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
AT&T, INC. has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 3 violations and $1,083 in total penalties.
How does AT&T, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
AT&T, INC. operates in the telephone apparatus manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.9. AT&T, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 0.5.