Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

AT&T

1600 COLEMAN AVE., SANTA CLARA, CA, 95050
Operated by AT&T Inc · 1 of 2,000 establishments

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 18 years
Violations
1
$185 in penalties
Penalties
$185
$185 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

AT&T has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 18 years of recorded history, with $185 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 55th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 221 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 18 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

AT&T appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 18 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$185
$185 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Peer comparison

55th

Above average violations in NAICS 5171 within CA. Peer group: 221 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
60th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for AT&T. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.6
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AT&T. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
18 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 18+ years. Most recent activity: 18 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for AT&T Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
441
Unfair labor practice
438
Representation (union)
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other AT&T Inc locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 100 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
31-CA-388179Unfair labor practiceJun 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-387590Unfair labor practiceMay 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-386622Unfair labor practiceMay 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-383597Unfair labor practiceMar 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-382664Unfair labor practiceMar 2026—OpenRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-381410Unfair labor practiceFeb 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-379201Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-379198Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-378883Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-377389Unfair labor practiceDec 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-377344Unfair labor practiceDec 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-375712Unfair labor practiceNov 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-373556Unfair labor practiceSep 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-371609Unfair labor practiceAug 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-370101Unfair labor practiceJul 2025—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-369233Unfair labor practiceJul 2025—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-369304Unfair labor practiceJul 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-367748Unfair labor practiceJun 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-367747Unfair labor practiceJun 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-367746Unfair labor practiceJun 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-367745Unfair labor practiceJun 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-365877Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-365004Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Feb 2026ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-365003Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-364997Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Feb 2026ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-364991Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-364441Unfair labor practiceApr 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-364085Unfair labor practiceApr 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-362532Unfair labor practiceMar 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-361989Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-361988Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-361655Unfair labor practiceMar 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-359135Unfair labor practiceJan 2025—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-357585Unfair labor practiceDec 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-357419Unfair labor practiceDec 2024May 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-353714Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-350973Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-349786Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Sep 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-346807Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-336200Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Feb 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-330074Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-327996Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-327418Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-327649Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-320345Unfair labor practiceJun 2023—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-319696Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-319527Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Jul 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-315204Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Jun 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-310631Unfair labor practiceJan 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-295385Unfair labor practiceMay 2022—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-294340Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-294037Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-292465Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-291259Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-291254Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-289357Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-288921Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Feb 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-288504Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-285068Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-283233Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-278607Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-277525Unfair labor practiceMay 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-273630Unfair labor practiceMar 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-270909Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-270429Unfair labor practiceDec 2020Feb 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-270181Unfair labor practiceDec 2020Jul 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-269244Unfair labor practiceNov 2020Feb 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-268348Unfair labor practiceOct 2020Jun 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-265711Unfair labor practiceSep 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-263501Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Oct 2020ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-261582Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-261575Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-258387Unfair labor practiceMar 2020Jun 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-256819Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-255452Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-252452Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-250149Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-250147Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-249046Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Apr 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-248577Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-246573Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-244349Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-243259Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-243182Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-242846Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-242167Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-242032Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-240004Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-239999Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-239995Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-239929Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-239895Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-239891Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-239887Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Mar 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-239405Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-239372Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-239309Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-239282Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-239269Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-239257Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2023ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AT&T. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AT&T. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
AT&T
310 MARTIN AVE · SANTA CLARA, CA, 95050
RCRANo Violation Identified00——View →
AT&T
1051 MARTIN AVE · SANTA CLARA, CA, 95050
RCRANo Violation Identified00——View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AT&T. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — AT&T INC. (across 125 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$435.6M
Obligated (all-time)
$9.4B
Awards (all-time)
63,960

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2008-05-22Complaint1—$185

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

AT&T is one of 2,000 establishments rolled up under the parent organization AT&T Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of AT&T Inc across all 2,000 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in this industry within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

  • VERIZONVICTORVILLE — 3 federal enforcement records
  • SBCSAN FRANCISCO — 2 federal enforcement records
  • SBCSANTA MARIA — 2 federal enforcement records
  • VERIZON CALIFORNIA INCRANCHO CUCAMONGA — 2 federal enforcement records
  • A T & TSANTA CLARA — 2 federal enforcement records
  • SBCLOS ANGELES — 2 federal enforcement records
  • AT & T SERVICES, INCOAKLAND — 2 federal enforcement records
  • AT & T CALIFORNIAOAKLAND — 2 federal enforcement records
  • SBCBakersfield — 2 federal enforcement records
  • VERIZON COMMUNICATIONSSANTA FE SPRINGS — 2 federal enforcement records

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by AT&T Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

  • SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONEWICHITA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TSACRAMENTO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T, INC.NORCROSS, GA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TMINNEAPOLIS, MN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&THOUSTON, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT & TSAN RAMON, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TRENO, NV — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TCERRITOS, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&T CORP.NASHVILLE, TN — 3 federal enforcement records
  • AT&TArlington, TX — 2 federal enforcement records

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AT&T from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup AT&T Inc, which operates 2,000 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is AT&T's OSHA violation history?
AT&T has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $185 in total penalties.