Skip to main content

Establishment profile

ARANDELL CORPORATION

N82 W13118 LEON ROAD, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI, 53051
323111Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books)
EIN 853986525

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
10
over 28 years
Violations
8
$6,310 in penalties
Penalties
$6,310
$789 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
3 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

ARANDELL CORPORATION has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 10 inspections over 28 years of recorded history, with $6,310 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 73rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 213 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 99th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 months ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ARANDELL CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
10
0.4 / yr · last 28 yrs
Violations
8
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$6,310
$789 avg / violation
38% serious62% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
6 of 10
Inspection trigger · referral
4 of 10

30% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 8 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $6,310 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0037 B0411$3,060Dec 2010Dec 2010
29 CFR 1910.0178 N0111$2,500Dec 1997Dec 1997
29 CFR 1910.0022 B0111$750Dec 1997Dec 1997
29 CFR 1910.0157 G0211Dec 2010Dec 2010
29 CFR 1910.0022 B0211Dec 2010Dec 2010
29 CFR 1910.0022 D0111Jul 2008Jul 2008
29 CFR 1910.0178 L11Dec 1997Dec 1997
29 CFR 1910.0178 M0411Dec 1997Dec 1997

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

73rd

Above average violations in NAICS 3231 within WI. Peer group: 213 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
67th
peer median: $3,213
Inspection frequency
99th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.9
vs industry
−0.1
TRIR
2.1
vs industry
+0.4

Reported for 510 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.7
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.0
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
6
Referral
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · May 2021 – Nov 2021

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
1
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecified

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Nov 6, 2021Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecifiedFingertip(s)Amputation
May 13, 2021Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area, unspecifiedNonclassifiableHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Nov 6, 2021Amputated,Amputation,Chain,Finger,Printing Press,Sprocket1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
6 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 6 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 1 violation · $0 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
FMLA (family & medical leave)Jun 201811

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 1 violations · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Jun 2016 – Jun 2018Other Commercial PrintingFMLA11

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ARANDELL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in WI — for ARANDELL CORPORATION, not this location alone

Total cases
22
Unfair labor practice
22

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other ARANDELL CORPORATION locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 22 cases · 22 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
18-CA-379260Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-226145Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-204238Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
18-CA-162265Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-098512Unfair labor practiceFeb 2013Apr 2013ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-087408Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Oct 2012ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-078303Unfair labor practiceApr 2012May 2012ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-077425Unfair labor practiceMar 2012May 2012ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-065491Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-063588Unfair labor practiceAug 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018994Unfair labor practiceMay 2011Jul 2011ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018832Unfair labor practiceDec 2010May 2011ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018794Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Dec 2010ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018724Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018679Unfair labor practiceMay 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018426Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Feb 2010ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018267Unfair labor practiceFeb 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018246Unfair labor practiceJan 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018228Unfair labor practiceDec 2008Aug 2009ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-018213Unfair labor practiceNov 2008Jul 2009ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-017728Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Aug 2007ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
30-CA-017290Unfair labor practiceSep 2005Nov 2005ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ARANDELL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ARANDELL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
344642
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ARANDELL CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-12-12Referral0$0
2021-11-10Referral0$0
2021-05-18Referral0$0
2010-12-22Complaint0$0
2010-11-12Complaint3$3,060
2010-08-11Complaint0$0
2008-05-07Complaint1$0
2003-11-17Complaint0$0
1998-02-09Referral0$0
1997-10-30Complaint43$3,250

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in commercial printing (except screen and books) within WI, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ARANDELL CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ARANDELL CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
ARANDELL CORPORATION has 10 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $6,310 in total penalties.
How does ARANDELL CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
ARANDELL CORPORATION operates in the commercial printing (except screen and books) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.7. ARANDELL CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 0.95 compared to an industry average of 1.