Establishment profile
AERO METAL FINISHING, INC
2150 N. LARK INDUSTRIAL DR., FENTON, MO, 63026
332813 — Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Summary
AERO METAL FINISHING, INC has accumulated 43 OSHA violations across 7 inspections over 40 years of recorded history, with $7,556 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 91 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 89th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 16 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
AERO METAL FINISHING, INC appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
86% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 26 citations in this view · $7,506 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 2 | 2 | $700 | Oct 1989 | Apr 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I | 2 | 2 | $450 | Oct 1989 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 B05 I | 2 | 2 | — | Mar 1986 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II | 2 | 2 | — | Oct 1989 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0094 D09 VIII | 2 | 2 | — | Mar 1986 | Oct 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 E02 | 2 | 2 | — | Mar 1986 | Oct 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 A07 | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | Dec 2009 | Dec 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 V | 1 | 1 | $625 | Jan 1993 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 1 | 1 | $525 | Apr 2004 | Apr 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0094 D10 | 1 | 1 | $490 | Mar 1986 | Mar 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 C02 | 1 | 1 | $490 | Mar 1986 | Mar 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | $446 | Mar 1998 | Mar 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 II | 1 | 1 | $375 | Jan 1993 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0107 B09 | 1 | 1 | $375 | Jan 1993 | Jan 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H | 1 | 1 | $250 | Oct 1989 | Oct 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 1 | 1 | $250 | Oct 1989 | Oct 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 IVA | 1 | 1 | $150 | Oct 1989 | Oct 1989 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0005 A | 1 | 1 | $140 | Mar 1986 | Mar 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0005 C | 1 | 1 | $70 | Mar 1986 | Mar 1986 |
| 29 CFR 1903.0002 A01 | 1 | 1 | $70 | Mar 1986 | Mar 1986 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3328 within MO. Peer group: 91 employers. This establishment has 43 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 46 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 16+ years. Most recent activity: 16 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AERO METAL FINISHING INC 2150 NORTH LARK DRIVE · FENTON, MO, 63026 | AirWaterRCRA | No Violation Identified | 2 | 0 | — | Jan 2022 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AERO METAL FINISHING, INC. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-11-05 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | |
| 2004-03-25 | Planned | 2 | — | $1,225 | |
| 2000-04-25 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-12-02 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $446 | |
| 1992-11-02 | Planned | 10 | — | $1,575 | |
| 1989-06-25 | Complaint | 13 | 7 | $950 | |
| 1986-02-26 | Complaint | 16 | 2 | $1,260 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring within MO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- SULLIVAN PRECISION METAL FINISHINGSULLIVAN — 2 federal enforcement records
- DE TRAY PLATING WORKSINDEPENDENCE — 2 federal enforcement records
- GRAHAM ENTERPRISES, LLCLACLEDE — 2 federal enforcement records
- OZARK MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.CUBA — 2 federal enforcement records
- COMMERCIAL PLATING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS — 2 federal enforcement records
- MID-WEST PLATING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS — 1 federal enforcement record
- MONNIG INDUSTRIESGLASGOW — 1 federal enforcement record
- C & A METAL FINISHING COMPANYSAPPINGTON — 1 federal enforcement record
- P C PLATING INCFENTON — 1 federal enforcement record
- HEARTLAND METAL FINISHING, INC.SALEM — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MOState-wide enforcement data
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, in MOIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AERO METAL FINISHING, INC from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is AERO METAL FINISHING, INC's OSHA violation history?
- AERO METAL FINISHING, INC has 7 OSHA inspections on record with 43 violations and $7,556 in total penalties.
- How does AERO METAL FINISHING, INC's safety record compare to its industry?
- AERO METAL FINISHING, INC operates in the electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1. AERO METAL FINISHING, INC's self-reported DART rate is 8.26 compared to an industry average of 2.3.