Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

ABM

7260 WORLD WAY WEST, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90045
Operated by ABM · 1 of 62 establishments
488190 — Other Support Activities for Air Transportation

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 3 years
Violations
2
$18,000 in penalties
Penalties
$18,000
$9,000 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

ABM has accumulated 2 OSHA violations across 1 inspection over 3 years of recorded history, with $18,000 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 48th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 249 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 3 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ABM appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.3 / yr · last 3 yrs
Violations
2
0.7 / yr
Penalties
$18,000
$9,000 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · accident
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 2 citations in this view · $18,000 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
3385(A)11$18,000Dec 2023Dec 2023
3380(F)(1)11—Dec 2023Dec 2023

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

48th

Below average violations in NAICS 4881 within CA. Peer group: 249 employers. This establishment has 2 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
88th
peer median: $650
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.8
vs industry
−2.0
TRIR
0.8
vs industry
−3.4

Reported for 133 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Accident
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ABM. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
3 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 3+ years. Most recent activity: 3 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ABM. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ABM. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for ABM, not this location alone

Total cases
94
Unfair labor practice
93
Representation (union)
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other ABM locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 94 cases · 93 ULP · 1 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
32-RC-380323Representation electionFeb 2026Feb 2026ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-372124Unfair labor practiceAug 2025Nov 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-370971Unfair labor practiceAug 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-354050Unfair labor practiceNov 2024May 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-338016Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-316435Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-315966Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-315418Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Nov 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-315340Unfair labor practiceMar 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-315068Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Nov 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-309209Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Sep 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-304467Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-304020Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-303952Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-303558Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-302911Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Jul 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-302305Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-301450Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-300206Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-299306Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Dec 2023ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-299393Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-299376Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-299185Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-298911Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-297349Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-296889Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-296070Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-284905Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-284494Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-283331Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-282334Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-276312Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-275794Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-274539Unfair labor practiceMar 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-263232Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-259850Unfair labor practiceApr 2020Jul 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-252210Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-251807Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-251644Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-250407Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-247374Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-245485Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-241501Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-238501Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-236434Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-235898Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-231125Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Apr 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-230727Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-230754Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Feb 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-230060Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Jan 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-228574Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-228617Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-222165Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-221863Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-216279Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-215285Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-214945Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018Mar 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-213028Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-213021Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-207670Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Jul 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-203352Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Apr 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-200192Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Aug 2017ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-198029Unfair labor practiceMay 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-186279Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-180577Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-167156Unfair labor practiceJan 2016Feb 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-165075Unfair labor practiceNov 2015Dec 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-162185Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Jan 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-144791Unfair labor practiceJan 2015Mar 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-144062Unfair labor practiceJan 2015Mar 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-122680Unfair labor practiceFeb 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-120245Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Sep 2014ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-106267Unfair labor practiceMay 2013Aug 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-097057Unfair labor practiceJan 2013Aug 2013ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-092408Unfair labor practiceOct 2012May 2013ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-083866Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-025496Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Dec 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-035323Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034954Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034905Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034788Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-039129Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-024657Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-034321Unfair labor practiceFeb 2009Apr 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034143Unfair labor practiceOct 2008Dec 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-038399Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Aug 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-033682Unfair labor practiceNov 2007Dec 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033345Unfair labor practiceMar 2007Apr 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032971Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Jun 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032946Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Jun 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032917Unfair labor practiceMar 2006Aug 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032890Unfair labor practiceFeb 2006Apr 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032765Unfair labor practiceOct 2005Sep 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032456Unfair labor practiceApr 2005Jun 2005ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ABM. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ABM. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ABM. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2023-07-31Accident22$18,000

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

ABM is one of 62 establishments rolled up under the parent organization ABM.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of ABM across all 62 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other support activities for air transportation within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by ABM, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

  • ABMPhiladelphia, PA — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMWaterford, NY — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMSAN ANGELO, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMPITTSBURGH, PA — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMHouston, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMHouston, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMDaytona Beach, FL — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMAmarillo, TX — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMSOUTHINGTON, CT — 2 federal enforcement records
  • ABMCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO — 2 federal enforcement records

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ABM from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup ABM, which operates 62 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ABM's OSHA violation history?
ABM has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 2 violations and $18,000 in total penalties.
How does ABM's safety record compare to its industry?
ABM operates in the other support activities for air transportation industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1. ABM's self-reported DART rate is 0.75 compared to an industry average of 2.7.