Establishment profile
WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.
1101 NORTH COURT STREET, MONTGOMERY, AL, 36104
312111 — Soft Drink Manufacturing
EIN 630002930
Summary
WHITFIELD FOODS, INC. has accumulated 14 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 38 years of recorded history, with $8,140 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 91st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 24 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 61st percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
WHITFIELD FOODS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 12 distinct standards shown · 14 citations in this view · $8,140 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $6,740 | Jul 1988 | Aug 2023 |
| 5A0001 | 2 | 1 | $480 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 1 | 1 | $300 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I | 1 | 1 | $300 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 1 | 1 | $180 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | $140 | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 F | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0026 A01 V | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A02 | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 1988 | Jul 1988 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3121 within AL. Peer group: 24 employers. This establishment has 14 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 121 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Aug 2023
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2023 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2011-12-31$707
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2010-12-31$604
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2010-09-30$561
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2011-03-31$497
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2012-06-30$484
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2010-08-31$464
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2012-03-31$431
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2012-09-30$408
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2011-06-30$393
- Department of DefenseRESALE-SYRUPScontract · Last action 2011-09-30$329
- Department of DefenseRESALE - SYRUPScontract · Last action 2010-01-06$0
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 311930 - FLAVORING SYRUP AND CONCENTRATE MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2012-09-30. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $6,500 | |
| 1988-06-22 | Planned | 13 | 8 | $1,640 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in soft drink manufacturing within AL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- BUFFALO ROCK COMPANYMONTGOMERY — 3 federal enforcement records
- BUFFALO ROCK COMPANYBIRMINGHAM — 2 federal enforcement records
- BUFFALO ROCK COMPANYHUNTSVILLE — 2 federal enforcement records
- BUFFALO ROCK COMPANYMADISON — 2 federal enforcement records
- BUFFALO ROCK COMPANYDOTHAN — 2 federal enforcement records
- COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED, INC.MONTGOMERY — 1 federal enforcement record
- COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED, INC.BIRMINGHAM — 1 federal enforcement record
- COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED, INC.MOBILE — 1 federal enforcement record
- COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED-EAST, LLCBIRMINGHAM — 1 federal enforcement record
- BIG SPRINGS, INC.HUNTSVILLE — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Soft Drink ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in ALState-wide enforcement data
- Soft Drink Manufacturing in ALIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WHITFIELD FOODS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- WHITFIELD FOODS, INC. has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 14 violations and $8,140 in total penalties.
- How does WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- WHITFIELD FOODS, INC. operates in the soft drink manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5.7. WHITFIELD FOODS, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 1.57 compared to an industry average of 4.7.