Skip to main content

Establishment profile

VERIZON

RACE LANE AND RAILROAD AVE, EAST HAMPTON, NY, 11937
Operated by Verizon Communications · 1 of 696 establishments

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 11 years
Violations
1
$7,000 in penalties
Penalties
$7,000
$7,000 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

VERIZON has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 11 years of recorded history, with $7,000 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 62nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 38 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

VERIZON appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 11 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$7,000
$7,000 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · referral
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Peer comparison

62nd

Above average violations in NAICS 5171 within NY. Peer group: 38 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
92nd
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for VERIZON. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.6
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Referral
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Apr 2015

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
1
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Contact with objects and equipment, unspecified

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Apr 16, 2015Contact with objects and equipment, unspecifiedFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for VERIZON. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for VERIZON. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NY — for Verizon Communications, not this location alone

Total cases
83
Unfair labor practice
83

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Verizon Communications locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 83 cases · 83 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
02-CA-373280Unfair labor practiceSep 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-327780Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-327752Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-325107Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-311744Unfair labor practiceFeb 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-292460Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-282849Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Jul 2022ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-278022Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Mar 2026ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-273310Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021May 2021ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-271862Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Nov 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-258106Unfair labor practiceMar 2020Mar 2026ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-245791Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Apr 2026ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-242334Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-241654Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-229850Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-221868Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-217228Unfair labor practiceMar 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-216670Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Mar 2018ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
29-CA-201717Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-181937Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-160238Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-160150Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Nov 2015ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
02-CA-155109Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-128115Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Oct 2016ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
29-CA-127934Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-080297Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Jun 2012ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
02-CA-060876Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-040532Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Dec 2012ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-030615Unfair labor practiceJan 2011Apr 2011ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-040284Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Mar 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-027912Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
02-CA-040270Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Feb 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-030469Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Dec 2010ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-027798Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-027739Unfair labor practiceJul 2010Aug 2010ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
10-CA-038456Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
02-CA-039980Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jun 2010ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-027688Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
02-CA-039917Unfair labor practiceMay 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-027592Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Feb 2013ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-027537Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
29-CA-030002Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-029943Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-029942Unfair labor practiceDec 2009Jan 2010ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-039506Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Apr 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-029628Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-039317Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Jun 2009ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039299Unfair labor practiceMay 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-029454Unfair labor practiceFeb 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-038818Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Aug 2008ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-028796Unfair labor practiceMar 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-028401Unfair labor practiceJul 2007Sep 2007ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-026388Unfair labor practiceJul 2007Sep 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-026381Unfair labor practiceJul 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-026301Unfair labor practiceMay 2007Aug 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-026299Unfair labor practiceMay 2007Jan 2009ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-026255Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Apr 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
02-CA-038171Unfair labor practiceMar 2007May 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-026240Unfair labor practiceMar 2007May 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-026194Unfair labor practiceFeb 2007Apr 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
12-CA-025274Unfair labor practiceDec 2006Jul 2007ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
01-CA-043705Unfair labor practiceDec 2006Feb 2007ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
02-CA-038019Unfair labor practiceDec 2006Mar 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-037997Unfair labor practiceNov 2006Apr 2012ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-037979Unfair labor practiceNov 2006Jan 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-037961Unfair labor practiceNov 2006Jan 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-027879Unfair labor practiceAug 2006Dec 2007ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
03-CA-025964Unfair labor practiceAug 2006Apr 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025856Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Jan 2007ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025782Unfair labor practiceMar 2006May 2006ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025689Unfair labor practiceDec 2005Jan 2006ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025486Unfair labor practiceJul 2005May 2006ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025455Unfair labor practiceJun 2005Feb 2006ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025391Unfair labor practiceMay 2005Jun 2005ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-025100Unfair labor practiceOct 2004Jan 2005ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
29-CA-025916Unfair labor practiceOct 2003Mar 2004ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-035381Unfair labor practiceMar 2003Dec 2003ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-035152Unfair labor practiceDec 2002Nov 2003ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
03-CA-023948Unfair labor practiceNov 2002Apr 2005ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
03-CA-022987Unfair labor practiceMar 2001Aug 2004ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
34-CA-009609Unfair labor practiceMar 2001May 2009ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-009603Unfair labor practiceMar 2001May 2001ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-009534Unfair labor practiceJan 2001Feb 2001ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for VERIZON. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for VERIZON. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for VERIZON. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC (across 115 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$298.0M
Obligated (all-time)
$7.7B
Awards (all-time)
62,841

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2015-04-21Referral11$7,000

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

VERIZON is one of 696 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Verizon Communications.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Verizon Communications across all 696 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in this industry within NY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Verizon Communications, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on VERIZON from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Verizon Communications, which operates 696 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is VERIZON's OSHA violation history?
VERIZON has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $7,000 in total penalties.