Skip to main content

Establishment profile

US POSTAL SERVICE

11251 RANCHO CARMEL DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92199
Operated by United States Postal Service · 1 of 6,876 establishments
924110Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
EIN 410760000

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
6
over 33 years
Violations
12
$70,622 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

US POSTAL SERVICE has accumulated 12 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 33 years of recorded history, with $70,622 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 94th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 468 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 99th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

US POSTAL SERVICE appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
6
0.2 / yr · last 33 yrs
Violations
12
0.4 / yr
Penalties
$70,622
$5,885 avg / violation
8% serious92% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
3 of 6
Inspection trigger · planned
3 of 6

67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 12 distinct standards shown · 12 citations in this view · $70,622 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0037 A0311$38,839Feb 2017Feb 2017
29 CFR 1910.0178 P0111$19,419Feb 2017Feb 2017
29 CFR 1910.0334 A02 II11$2,000Oct 2012Oct 2012
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV A11$2,000Oct 2012Oct 2012
29 CFR 1910.0305 J02 IV11$2,000Oct 2012Oct 2012
29 CFR 1910.0212 B11$1,700Jun 2003Jun 2003
29 CFR 1910.0178 A0611$1,294Feb 2017Feb 2017
29 CFR 1910.0157 E0311$1,294Feb 2017Feb 2017
29 CFR 1910.0253 B04 III11$1,275Jun 2003Jun 2003
29 CFR 1910.0213 C0311$800Jun 2003Jun 2003
29 CFR 1910.0133 A0311May 2019May 2019
29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III11Oct 2012Oct 2012

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

94th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 9241 within CA. Peer group: 468 employers. This establishment has 12 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
100th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
99th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.2
vs industry
+0.3
TRIR
2.2
vs industry
−1.0

Reported for 43 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.9
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
3
Complaint
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2025

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Other fall to lower level less than 6 feet

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed). 100% of this employer's reports came from a state-plan program.

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 3, 2025Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetArm(s) unspecifiedHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for US POSTAL SERVICE. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for US POSTAL SERVICE. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for United States Postal Service, not this location alone

Total cases
50
Unfair labor practice
50

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other United States Postal Service locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 50 cases · 50 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
31-CA-201425Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-030141Unfair labor practiceMar 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-029953Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-029941Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-035215Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Sep 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-025018Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Apr 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-024946Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Aug 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-034260Unfair labor practiceJan 2009Feb 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034259Unfair labor practiceJan 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-024181Unfair labor practiceOct 2008Feb 2012ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-024166Unfair labor practiceOct 2008Feb 2012ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-024082Unfair labor practiceSep 2008Jan 2013ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-028845Unfair labor practiceJul 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028795Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028776Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-033683Unfair labor practiceNov 2007Jul 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033654Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Dec 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-028516Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028515Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-033605Unfair labor practiceSep 2007Nov 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-028454Unfair labor practiceSep 2007Aug 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028445Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Sep 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028418Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Aug 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028417Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Aug 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-023427Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-028346Unfair labor practiceJun 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028345Unfair labor practiceJun 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028344Unfair labor practiceJun 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028343Unfair labor practiceJun 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-033379Unfair labor practiceApr 2007May 2007ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-033106Unfair labor practiceAug 2006Sep 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-027795Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Jul 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-027740Unfair labor practiceMar 2006Nov 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-032835Unfair labor practiceDec 2005Mar 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032834Unfair labor practiceDec 2005Mar 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-022395Unfair labor practiceDec 2005Oct 2007ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-027612Unfair labor practiceNov 2005Mar 2006ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-027602Unfair labor practiceNov 2005Jul 2007ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-032761Unfair labor practiceOct 2005Mar 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-032681Unfair labor practiceSep 2005Feb 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-021942Unfair labor practiceMar 2005Jul 2005ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-026717Unfair labor practiceMar 2004Jan 2008ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-026647Unfair labor practiceJan 2004Apr 2006ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-035532Unfair labor practiceJan 2003Apr 2003ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-018965Unfair labor practiceJun 2001May 2004ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-029454Unfair labor practiceJan 2000Jul 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-028961Unfair labor practiceFeb 1999Nov 1999ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-028870Unfair labor practiceJan 1999Aug 2006ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-028122Unfair labor practiceOct 1997Nov 2000ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-015431Unfair labor practiceMay 1996Nov 2002ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for US POSTAL SERVICE. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for US POSTAL SERVICE. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for US POSTAL SERVICE. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (across 87 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$2.7M
Obligated (all-time)
$361.5M
Awards (all-time)
8,920

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2019-04-02Complaint1$0
2017-01-10Planned4$60,847
2012-08-16Planned4$6,000
2003-05-06Planned31$3,775
1999-06-01Complaint0$0
1993-01-29Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

US POSTAL SERVICE is one of 6,876 establishments rolled up under the parent organization United States Postal Service.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of United States Postal Service across all 6,876 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in administration of air and water resource and solid waste management programs within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by United States Postal Service, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on US POSTAL SERVICE from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup United States Postal Service, which operates 6,876 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is US POSTAL SERVICE's OSHA violation history?
US POSTAL SERVICE has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 12 violations and $70,621.5 in total penalties.
How does US POSTAL SERVICE's safety record compare to its industry?
US POSTAL SERVICE operates in the administration of air and water resource and solid waste management programs industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.2. US POSTAL SERVICE's self-reported DART rate is 2.21 compared to an industry average of 1.9.