Establishment profile
United Space Alliance
600 Gemini, Houston, TX, 77058
927110 — Space Research and Technology
Summary
United Space Alliance has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.
The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 18 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
United Space Alliance appears in WHD wage enforcement record only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 18+ years. Most recent activity: 18 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 2 statutes · 47 violations · $6,805 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service Contract Act (federal services) | Mar 2003 | 1 | 42 | 21 | $6,697 | — |
| CWHSSA (federal-contract overtime) | Mar 2003 | 1 | 5 | 5 | $108 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · 47 violations · $6,805 in backwages · 22 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2006 – Mar 2008 | Space Research and Technology | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Oct 2002 – Mar 2003 | Space Research and Technology | CWHSSASCA | 47 | 21 | $6,805 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for United Space Alliance. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSPACE PROGRAM OPERATIONS CONTRACT (SPOC)contract · Last action 2017-05-25$6,638,269,203
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationINTEGRATED MISSION OPERATIONS CONTRACT (IMOC) PROVIDES SUPPORT AND PRODUCTS FOR THE MISSION OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE (MOD) AND FLIGHT CREW OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE (FCOD) GROUND-BASED HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT OPERATIONS CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION. THIS INCLUDES THE SUPPORT TO MISSION PREPARATION (PLAN), CREW AND FLIGHT CONTROLLER TRAINING (TRAIN), AND REAL-TIME MISSION EXECUTION (FLY) ACTIVITIES RELATED TO EXPLORATION OPERATIONS AND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) OPERATIONS (POST SHUTTLE RETIREMENT). OPERATIONS CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FROM THE CONTRACTOR AS NASA DEFINES OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EMERGING PROGRAMS FOR THE EXPLORATION INITIATIVES (PRIMARILY THE CONSTELLATION PROGRAM, BUT TO A LESSER EXTENT THE LUNAR PRECURSOR ROBOTIC PROGRAM, THE HUMAN RESEARCH PROGRAM, THE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM, AND THE COMMERCIAL CREW AND CARGO PROGRAM). INITIALLY, THE IMOC CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE FOR HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT OPERATIONS CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT EXCLUSIVE OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM (SSP) AND INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM (ISSP). POST SHUTTLE RETIREMENT, THIS CONTRACT WILL ALSO INCLUDE SUPPORT AND PRODUCTS FOR THE ISS PLAN-TRAIN-FLY (PTF) MISSION OPERATIONS. THE IMOC WILL INITIALLY PROVIDE NASA CONSTELLATION PROGRAM (CXP) PTF SUPPORT THAT FULLY REPLACES THE NASA CXP SUPPORT TASKS PERFORMED UNDER THE STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) SECTION 1.10, CONSTELLATION SUPPORT PROVISIONING, OF THE SPACE PROGRAM OPERATIONS CONTRACT (SPOC). UPON COMPLETION OF THE NASA WORK FOR THE SSP MISSIONS, THE IMOC WILL TAKE OVER THE NASA ISS SUPPORT PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED UNDER THE SPOC CONTRACT. THE GOVERNMENT WILL LEAD AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MISSION EXECUTION AND REQUISITE MISSION PREPARATION TASKS, NEW CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, NON-MISSION SPECIFIC PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT TASKS, AND DISPOSITION OF ANOMALIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL INFORMATION, ANALYSIS, AND RELEVANT PERSPECTIVES GAINED THROUGH OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE. THE GOVERNMENT, USING SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT, WILL DEFINE REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOP SPECIFICATIONS FOR FUTURE USE. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PREPARE, OR ASSIST IN PREPARING, WORK STATEMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED IN COMPETITIVELY ACQUIRING SERVICES, OR TO PROVIDE MATERIAL LEADING DIRECTLY, PREDICTABLY, AND WITHOUT DELAY TO SUCH WORK STATEMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR REQUIREMENTS UNLESS THE INTENDED PROCUREMENT IS A SOLE SOURCE TO THE CONTRACTOR, THE CONTRACTOR HAS PARTICIPATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN WORK, OR UNLESS MORE THAN ONE CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN PREPARING THE WORK STATEMENT. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO EVALUATE ITS CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE OR PRODUCTS OR THAT OF ITS COMPETITORS.contract · Last action 2016-08-29$416,632,847
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSPACE FLIGHT OPERATIONScontract · Last action 2016-10-03$5,350,026
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHEAVY LIFT&PROPULSION TECHNOLOGY (HLPT) SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND TRADE STUDY THIS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND TRADE STUDY SHALL IDENTIFY HOW ALTERNATIVE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM SOLUTIONS ADDRESS KEY DECISION ATTRIBUTES/FIGURES OF MERIT/MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: PROVIDE A RECOMMENDED LIST OF KEY DECISION ATTRIBUTES AND RATIONALE ASSOCIATED WITH EACH. PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE WEIGHTING OF THE RECOMMENDED KEY DECISION ATTRIBUTES. IDENTIFY HOW CHANGES TO THE WEIGHTING OF KEY DECISION ATTRIBUTES AFFECT THE ARCHITECTURES. IDENTIFY HOW ALTERNATIVE GROUND RULES AND ASSUMPTIONS IMPACT THE IDENTIFIED ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS. IDENTIFY HOW INNOVATIVE OR NON-TRADITIONAL PROCESSES OR TECHNOLOGIES CAN BE APPLIED TO THE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEMS TO DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE ITS AFFORDABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY. IDENTIFY HOW ASPECTS OF A HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM (INCLUDING STAGES, SUBSYSTEMS, AND MAJOR COMPONENTS) COULD HAVE COMMONALITY WITH OTHER USER APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING NASA, DOD, COMMERCIAL, AND INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS. IDENTIFY HOW INCREMENTAL DEVELOPMENT TESTING, INCLUDING GROUND AND FLIGHT TESTING, OF HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM ELEMENTS CAN ENHANCE THE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM, AND FOR EACH CAPABILITY GAP IDENTIFY SPECIFIC AREAS WHERE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MAY BE NEEDED. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRST-STAGE MAIN ENGINE FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND PROGRAMMATIC CHARACTERISTICS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT EACH HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM STUDIED. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UPPER-STAGE MAIN ENGINE FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND PROGRAMMATIC CHARACTERISTICS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT EACH HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM STUDIED. IDENTIFY ANY IMPACTS TO OVERALL LIFE CYCLE COSTS OF THE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM BASED ON THE ENGINE STUDIED. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL OTHER TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM, E.G. TANKS, PROPELLANT AND PRESSURIZATION SYSTEMS, INTEGRATED SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT, AUXILIARY PROPULSION SYSTEMS, AVIONICS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES. IDENTIFY TEST AND INTEGRATED DEMONSTRATIONS TO MITIGATE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE GAPS. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE IN-SPACE SPACE PROPULSION ELEMENTS FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND PROGRAMMATIC CHARACTERISTICS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT EACH HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM STUDIED. IDENTIFY ANY IMPACTS TO OVERALL LIFE CYCLE COSTS OF THE HEAVY LIFT SYSTEM BASED ON THE ENGINES STUDIED. IDENTIFY CAPABILITY GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL OTHER TECHNICAL ELEMENTS OF THE IN-SPACE SPACE PROPULSION ELEMENT, E.G. TANKS, PROPELLANT AND PRESSURIZATION SYSTEMS, CRYOGENIC FLUID MANAGEMENT, INTEGRATED SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT, AUXILIARY PROPULSION SYSTEMS, AVIONICS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AUTONOMOUS RENDEZVOUS AND DOCKING. IDENTIFY TEST AND INTEGRATED DEMONSTRATIONS TO MITIGATE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE GAPS. IDENTIFY WHAT IN-SPACE SPACE PROPULSION ELEMENTS, IF ANY, WHICH SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED VIA SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIMENTS.contract · Last action 2011-11-08$395,000
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationTHERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEM CANDIDATE REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TESTING FOR ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE UPPER STAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED STATEMENT OF WORK. IN ADDITION TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF GSA CONTRACT GS-10F-0241U AND BPA NNM09AA00Z, THE CLAUSES INCLUDED HEREIN ALSO APPLY.contract · Last action 2011-10-18$183,983
- General Services AdministrationVESST IDIQ DELIVERY ORDER 0006 (TUBE ASSEMBLY, METAL)contract · Last action 2013-08-30$103,919
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEXPLORATION SYSTEMS MISSION DIRECTORATE LUNAR SURFACE SYSTEMS CONCEPTS STUDY THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) IS CURRENTLY STUDYING LUNAR OUTPOST ARCHITECTURE CONCEPTS, INCLUDING HABITATION, MOBILITY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, TO SUPPORT U.S. LUNAR EXPLORATION AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES. NASA IS IN THE PROCESS OF DEFINING FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES AND CONCEPTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE CORE CAPABILITIES. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREAS ALTERNATIVE PACKAGING OPTIONS OBJECTIVE THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY IS TO PRODUCE ALTERNATIVE PACKING OPTIONS THAT ELIMINATE OR MINIMIZE WASTE GENERATION FROM PACKING MATERIALS AND ALLOW OPTIMAL UTILIZATION OF AVAILABLE STOWAGE VOLUME. POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES CAN INCLUDE CONCEPTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE PACKING MATERIAL AT ALL OR THAT EMPLOY PACKING MATERIALS THAT HAVE SECONDARY USES. A THIRD, BUT LESS DESIRABLE, APPROACH WOULD BE PACKING MATERIALS WHOSE VOLUME IS REDUCED FOLLOWING USE BUT WHICH STILL BECOME WASTE. ALL OPTIONS MUST SATISFY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL PACKING FUNCTION, MUST STRIVE TO MINIMIZE THE MASS OF THE PACKING MATERIALS, AND MUST COMPLY WITH OTHER SPACEFLIGHT REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS FLAMMABILITY AND OFFGASSING. AN ADDITIONAL GOAL IS THAT THE MASS OF PACKING MATERIAL NOT EXCEED THE MASS OF THE ITEM, OR ITEMS, BEING PACKED. BACKGROUND HISTORICALLY, PACKING MATERIALS HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED TO PROTECT STOWABLE HARDWARE ITEMS DURING ASCENT FROM THE AMBIENT VIBROACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT. EXAMPLES OF ITEMS THAT ARE PACKED IN THIS WAY INCLUDE SPARE SPACECRAFT HARDWARE COMPONENTS, TOOLS, SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, FOOD AND PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT. THESE PACKING MATERIALS OCCUPY A SIGNIFICANT FRACTION OF THE AVAILABLE STOWAGE VOLUME. ADDITIONALLY, THESE PACKING MATERIALS ACCOUNT FOR A VERY SUBSTANTIAL PROPORTION OF THE WASTE STREAM THAT EVOLVES DURING A MISSION AS THE STOWED ITEMS ARE UTILIZED AND THE PACKING MATERIAL NO LONGER SERVES A PURPOSE. THE END RESULT IS CONSUMPTION OF STOWAGE VOLUME BY MATERIAL THAT ENDS UP AS WASTE. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS TOPIC-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE ORAL AND WRITTEN CONTRACT DELIVERABLES, SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 8 OF SECTION IX, INCLUDE: 1. DEFINING THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS 2. ADDRESSING COMPLIANCE WITH FUNCTIONAL AND COMPATIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 3. DEFINING THE UNIT MASS OF PROPOSED MATERIALS, AND 4. DEFINING SECONDARY USES OF MATERIALS, AS APPLICABLE. MINIMUM FUNCTIONALITY HABITATION ELEMENT OBJECTIVE THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY IS TO PRODUCE A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR A MINIMUM FUNCTIONALITY HABITATION ELEMENT BASED ON A MINIMUM SET OF FUNCTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE REFERENCE MISSION. THE MINIMUM FUNCTIONALITY HABITATION ELEMENT INCLUDES BASIC REQUIRED SAFETY FEATURES BUT DOES NOT PROTECT FOR CONTINGENCY SITUATIONS.contract · Last action 2009-01-18$99,974
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationTEST EQUIPMENTcontract · Last action 2011-09-15$77,214
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS: EVALUATE FLIGHT HARDWARE INSPECTION PROCESScontract · Last action 2012-10-18$68,976
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION TECHNIQUE INVESTIGATION (NDE)contract · Last action 2012-03-12$60,868
- General Services AdministrationDELIVERY ORDER 0005 FOR NSN: 1660-01-253-9510 (HEAT EXCHANGER, AIR TO AIR, AIRCRAFT) UNDER VALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 9Q1HDSRFS004contract · Last action 2013-01-29$59,709
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUNITED SPACE ALLLIANCE (USA)TASK ORDER- HUMAN FACTOR ENGINEERINGcontract · Last action 2011-09-15$49,875
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSUPPORT SERVICE FOR ABLATIVE THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEMScontract · Last action 2011-05-23$45,833
- General Services AdministrationDELIVERY ORDER 0004 UNDER VALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 9Q1HDSRFS004contract · Last action 2012-09-26$37,615
- General Services AdministrationDELIVERY ORDER 0003 UNDER VALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 9Q1HDSRFS004contract · Last action 2013-01-24$36,130
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationINDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (IRAD) HUMAN ENGINEERING MODELING AND PERFORMANCE (HEMAP) SYSTEM EQUIPMENTcontract · Last action 2015-10-09$25,000
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPcontract · Last action 2009-02-23$24,203
- General Services AdministrationDELIVERY ORDER 0012 UNDER VALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 9Q1HDSRFS004contract · Last action 2013-01-24$23,620
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationTHERMAL BARRIERScontract · Last action 2012-03-29$22,342
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUNITED SPACE ALLIANCE (USA) - PROJECT DOCUMENTATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORTcontract · Last action 2012-04-16$22,231
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEVALULATION OF ORBITAL ARC WELDED TUBING.contract · Last action 2011-03-08$21,390
- General Services AdministrationFIRST DELIVERY ORDER UNDER VALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 9Q1HDSRFS004contract · Last action 2011-08-29$9,324
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationFLEX HOSE BLANKET FABRICATION INSULATION PACKAGEScontract · Last action 2011-11-18$6,989
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationTHE PURPOSE OF THIS PROCUREMENT IS TO ACQUIRE IT SUPPORT FROM UNITED SPACE ALLIANCE LLC FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN MSFC FOREIGN OBJECT DEBRIS (FOD) TRACKING SYSTEM.contract · Last action 2009-09-21$6,717
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSEPS BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT SET UP IS FOR SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING AND PROJECT SUPPORT AT MSFCcontract · Last action 2015-02-18$0
- General Services AdministrationVALUE ENGINEERING AND SOURCING SUPPORT TOOL (VESST) MULTIPLE AWARD IDIQ CONTRACTcontract · Last action 2013-10-18$0
- General Services AdministrationSIN: 871 1SERVICES REQUIRED UNDER THIS SIN INVOLVE THE DEFINITION AND INTERPRETATION OF HIGH LEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS PROJECTS, SYSTEMS, MISSIONS, ETC., AND THE OBJECTIVES AND APPROACHES TO THEIR ACHIEVEMENT.TYPICAL ASSOCIATED TASKS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO AN ANALYSIS OF MISSION, PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, PROGRAM EVALUATIONS, ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS, REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS, ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT, SPECIAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS, TRAINING, AND CONSULTING. EXAMPLE: THE EVALUATION AND PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF NEW AND/OR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR NAVIGATION SATELLITES SUCH AS LAUNCH PROCEDURES AND COSTS, MULTI-USER CAPABILITY, USEFUL SERVICE LIFE, ACCURACY AND RESISTANCE TO NATURAL AND MAN-MADE ELECTRONIC INTERFERENCE. PES DOES NOT INCLUDE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES AS DEFINED IN THE BROOKS ACT ANDFAR PART 2. PES DOES NOT INCLUDE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AS DEFINED IN THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATcontract · Last action 2013-05-14$0
- General Services AdministrationFEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACT.contract · Last action 2013-05-14$0
- General Services AdministrationFEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACT.contract · Last action 2008-05-20$0
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDATA MINING AND TRENDING WORKING GROUPcontract · Last action 2008-02-01$0
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUNITED SPACE ALLIANCE INC. CONTRACT AWARD FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PROVIDE SUPPORT AND DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE OF THE SPACE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (STS) AND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES, AND THEIR DATA BASES OF GROUND CONTROLLER ACTIVITIES DURING STS AND ISS OPERATIONS.contract · Last action 2013-05-08$-20,331
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 541710 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES. Last action: 2017-05-25. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in space research and technology within TX, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- Siemens Industry IncAustin — 2 federal enforcement records
- SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIESBROWNSVILLE — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Space Research and TechnologyAll employers in this industry
- Employers in TXState-wide enforcement data
- Space Research and in TXIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on United Space Alliance from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is United Space Alliance's OSHA violation history?
- United Space Alliance has no OSHA inspections on record.
- How does United Space Alliance's safety record compare to its industry?
- United Space Alliance operates in the space research and technology industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.4.