Skip to main content

Establishment profile

STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES

65 SCOTT SWAMP ROAD, FARMINGTON, CT, 06032
Operated by Stanley Access Technologies · 1 of 2 establishments
332321Metal Window and Door Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 24 years
Violations
24
$20,378 in penalties
Penalties
$20,378
$849 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES has accumulated 24 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 24 years of recorded history, with $20,378 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 75th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 136 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 87th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.2 / yr · last 24 yrs
Violations
24
1.0 / yr
Penalties
$20,378
$849 avg / violation
38% serious62% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 5
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 5

80% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view · $20,378 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0178 O0511$7,000Mar 2015Mar 2015
29 CFR 1910.0304 G0511$3,000Oct 2013Oct 2013
29 CFR 1926.1101 K02 IIA11$2,250Jun 2008Jun 2008
29 CFR 1910.1001 J02 I11$2,250Jun 2008Jun 2008
29 CFR 1910.1020 G01 I11$1,125Jun 2008Jun 2008
29 CFR 1910.0037 A0311$1,000Mar 2015Mar 2015
29 CFR 1910.0217 C02 IB11$813Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$813Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0132 D0111$650Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0332 B0111$650Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0304 F0411$414Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.1030 D04 IIA11$414Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0242 B11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0138 A11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0333 B02 I11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0133 A0311Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.1030 G02 IIC11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0095 G08 IIB11Dec 2001Dec 2001
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11Dec 2001Dec 2001

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

75th

Above average violations in NAICS 3323 within CT. Peer group: 136 employers. This establishment has 24 OSHA violations; peer median is 7.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
88th
peer median: $4,573
Inspection frequency
87th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.6
vs industry
−1.3
TRIR
2.9
vs industry
−0.5

Reported for 300 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.9
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Complaint
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jan 2015

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Other fall to lower level less than 6 feet

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jan 28, 2015Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetBrainHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$281
Employees affected
3

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 3 violations · $281 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Davis-Bacon (federal construction)Feb 2005133$281

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 3 violations · $281 in backwages · 3 workers affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Mar 2003 – Feb 2005Services for the Elderly and Persons with DisabilitiesDavis-Bacon33$281

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES
65 SCOTT SWAMP ROAD · FARMINGTON, CT, 06032
AirWaterRCRANo Violation Identified00Sep 2019View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2019-03-08Complaint0$0
2015-01-28Unprogrammed Related21$8,000
2013-10-22Planned1$3,000
2008-05-01Complaint3$5,625
2001-10-04Planned188$3,753

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Stanley Access Technologies.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Stanley Access Technologies across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in metal window and door manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Stanley Access Technologies, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES's OSHA violation history?
STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 24 violations and $20,378 in total penalties.
How does STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES's safety record compare to its industry?
STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES operates in the metal window and door manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.4. STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES's self-reported DART rate is 0.64 compared to an industry average of 1.9.