Skip to main content

Establishment profile

PRATT & WHITNEY

400 MAIN STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT, 06108
Operated by Waste Connections, Inc · 1 of 468 establishments
336412Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
EIN 060570975

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 15 years
Violations
2
$4,337 in penalties
Penalties
$4,337
$2,169 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

PRATT & WHITNEY has accumulated 2 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 15 years of recorded history, with $4,337 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 23rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 104 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 88th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 months ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

PRATT & WHITNEY appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.3 / yr · last 15 yrs
Violations
2
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$4,337
$2,169 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
4 of 5
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 5

20% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 2 citations in this view · $4,337 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0094 A04 I A11$4,337Jun 2020Jun 2020
29 CFR 1910.0094 A0711Jun 2020Jun 2020

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

23rd

Below average violations in NAICS 3364 within CT. Peer group: 104 employers. This establishment has 2 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
42nd
peer median: $5,897
Inspection frequency
88th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.1
vs industry
−0.5
TRIR
0.3
vs industry
−0.9

Reported for 9,784 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.6
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Dec 2016 – Jul 2019

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
2
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Fall on same level due to tripping over an object

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jul 4, 2019Nonvenomous insect bitesLeg(s), unspecifiedHospitalized
Dec 12, 2016Fall on same level due to tripping over an objectLower leg(s)Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
4 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 4 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Apr 2009 – Apr 2011Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PRATT & WHITNEY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CT — for Waste Connections, Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
30
Unfair labor practice
28
Representation (union)
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Waste Connections, Inc locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 30 cases · 28 ULP · 1 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
01-CA-378532Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-RC-338112Representation electionMar 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-225065Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Sep 2018ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-212175Unfair labor practiceDec 2017Jun 2019ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-206553Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Mar 2018ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-202638Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-200830Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-142411Unfair labor practiceDec 2014May 2015ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-137819Unfair labor practiceSep 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-107806Unfair labor practiceJun 2013Oct 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-070066Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-064612Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Nov 2011ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-013070Unfair labor practiceAug 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012978Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Jul 2011ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012972Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012879Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Feb 2011ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012712Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Aug 2010ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012485Unfair labor practiceOct 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012416Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Sep 2009ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012372Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Aug 2009ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-012013Unfair labor practiceMar 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-011693Unfair labor practiceFeb 2007Apr 2007ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-010540Unfair labor practiceJul 2003Sep 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-UC-000128UCJun 2003Aug 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-010092Unfair labor practiceApr 2002Jun 2002ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-010091Unfair labor practiceApr 2002Oct 2002ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-010065Unfair labor practiceApr 2002Jun 2002ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-009934Unfair labor practiceNov 2001Jan 2002ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-009477Unfair labor practiceOct 2000Jul 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-009445Unfair labor practiceOct 2000Feb 2001ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PRATT & WHITNEY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PRATT & WHITNEY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

Prosecutions
2
Total payments
$4.6M
Disposition
Guilty Plea
Crime type
Import / Export

First case: 2012-06-28. Most recent: 2012-06-28. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — RTX CORP (across 367 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$89.9B
Obligated (all-time)
$299.3B
Awards (all-time)
224,295

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2026-02-06Complaint0$0
2021-08-11Complaint0$0
2020-02-10Complaint2$4,337
2015-03-12Planned0$0
2014-11-03Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

PRATT & WHITNEY is one of 468 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Waste Connections, Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Waste Connections, Inc across all 468 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Waste Connections, Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PRATT & WHITNEY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Waste Connections, Inc, which operates 468 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is PRATT & WHITNEY's OSHA violation history?
PRATT & WHITNEY has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 2 violations and $4,337 in total penalties.
How does PRATT & WHITNEY's safety record compare to its industry?
PRATT & WHITNEY operates in the aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.2. PRATT & WHITNEY's self-reported DART rate is 0.11 compared to an industry average of 0.6.