Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

PARAGON SYSTEMS

400 NORTH 8TH STREET RICHMOND FEDERAL BUILDING, RICHMOND, VA, 23219
561612 — Security Guards and Patrol Services

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 7 years
Violations
1
$13,260 in penalties
Penalties
$13,260
$13,260 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

PARAGON SYSTEMS has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 7 years of recorded history, with $13,260 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 61st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 73 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

PARAGON SYSTEMS appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 7 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$13,260
$13,260 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $13,260 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0141 C01 I11$13,260Sep 2019Sep 2019

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

61st

Above average violations in NAICS 5616 within VA. Peer group: 73 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
100th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.9
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in VA — for PARAGON SYSTEMS, not this location alone

Total cases
149
Unfair labor practice
124
Representation (union)
23

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other PARAGON SYSTEMS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 89 ULP · 9 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
01-CA-380152Unfair labor practiceJan 2026Jun 2026ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
05-RC-366149Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
16-CA-363740Unfair labor practiceApr 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
05-CA-359209Unfair labor practiceJan 2025—OpenRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-344134Unfair labor practiceJun 2024Mar 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-338658Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Jul 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
03-UD-338244UDMar 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
05-CA-318929Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-294712Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Dec 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-293052Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Dec 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-286575Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-273286Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-272643Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Feb 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-272252Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Feb 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-270980Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Jan 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-269400Unfair labor practiceNov 2020—OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-269428Unfair labor practiceNov 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-269177Unfair labor practiceNov 2020Mar 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-266402Unfair labor practiceSep 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-265223Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Oct 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-263831Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-263852Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-260691Unfair labor practiceMay 2020Sep 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-259425Unfair labor practiceApr 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-253527Unfair labor practiceDec 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-251310Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-250798Unfair labor practiceOct 2019May 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-250712Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
04-CA-238428Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
05-CA-237734Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-237733Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-237732Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-236980Representation electionMar 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-236777Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Jul 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-234149Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Feb 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-229909Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-RC-229737Representation electionOct 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-226982Unfair labor practiceSep 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-225884Representation electionAug 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-225225Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
04-CA-224412Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
05-CA-222236Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Jul 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-222231Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Jul 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
04-CA-222204Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Apr 2019ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
05-CA-219503Unfair labor practiceMay 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-219448Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-218985Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-218142Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-217494Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
04-CA-215199Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018Jan 2020ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
05-CA-215092Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-213741Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-210689Unfair labor practiceNov 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-209372Representation electionNov 2017Mar 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-UD-208655UDOct 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-207161Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Oct 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-205717Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-202767Representation electionJul 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-200633Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Aug 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-199703Unfair labor practiceMay 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
20-CA-197767Unfair labor practiceApr 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
05-CA-196688Unfair labor practiceApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-196441Unfair labor practiceApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-194388Unfair labor practiceMar 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-192897Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-192890Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-192564Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-191637Unfair labor practiceJan 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-190536Unfair labor practiceDec 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-188379Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-176437Unfair labor practiceMay 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-176360Unfair labor practiceMay 2016Jul 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-174091Unfair labor practiceApr 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-174090Unfair labor practiceApr 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
03-RC-172375Representation electionMar 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 03, Buffalo, New York
18-CA-169495Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota
10-CA-168371Unfair labor practiceJan 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
19-CA-156694Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Sep 2015ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
10-CA-149955Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
20-CA-147113Unfair labor practiceFeb 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
12-CA-143249Unfair labor practiceDec 2014May 2019ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
10-CA-133879Unfair labor practiceAug 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-128330Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-127585Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-126723Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
12-CA-125586Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Aug 2014ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
10-CA-125659Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-125656Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
05-CA-125170Unfair labor practiceMar 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-125033Unfair labor practiceMar 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
10-CA-124081Unfair labor practiceMar 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
16-CA-123358Unfair labor practiceFeb 2014Mar 2014ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
01-CA-122816Unfair labor practiceFeb 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-RC-120364Representation electionJan 2014Jan 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
05-CA-120317Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Jan 2014ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
01-CA-119440Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Aug 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
05-CA-117894Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Jan 2014ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
01-CA-116786Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Aug 2014ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
05-CA-116070Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Oct 2015ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
12-RC-111630Representation electionAug 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for PARAGON SYSTEMS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2019-03-26Complaint11$13,260

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in security guards and patrol services within VA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PARAGON SYSTEMS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is PARAGON SYSTEMS's OSHA violation history?
PARAGON SYSTEMS has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $13,260 in total penalties.
How does PARAGON SYSTEMS's safety record compare to its industry?
PARAGON SYSTEMS operates in the security guards and patrol services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.4.