Skip to main content

Establishment profile

MISSION FOODS

11671 DAYTON DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, 91730
424490Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers
EIN 953756486

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
9
over 29 years
Violations
8
$5,850 in penalties
Penalties
$5,850
$731 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
4 hospitalizations · 2 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

MISSION FOODS has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 29 years of recorded history, with $5,850 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 87th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 750 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 97th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 months ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

MISSION FOODS appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
9
0.3 / yr · last 29 yrs
Violations
8
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$5,850
$731 avg / violation
13% serious87% other
Inspection trigger · accident
6 of 9
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 9

56% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 8 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $5,850 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
3314 C11$2,700Sep 2005Sep 2005
3314 G0111$750Sep 2005Sep 2005
3203 A0411$750Aug 2003Aug 2003
29 CFR 2395.0051 A0111$600Aug 1997Aug 1997
3210 C11$300May 2006May 2006
3314 A11$300Dec 2004Dec 2004
3578 G11$225Aug 1997Aug 1997
29 CFR 2320.0001 A11$225Aug 1997Aug 1997

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

87th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 4244 within CA. Peer group: 750 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
72nd
peer median: $1,268
Inspection frequency
97th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
6.7
vs industry
+3.3
TRIR
9.4
vs industry
+5.2

Reported for 700 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
3.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
9.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2
Accident
6

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for MISSION FOODS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Apr 17, 2012BURN,GLOVE,FOREARM,SPARK,ELECTRICAL BOX,UNTRAINED,WASHING MACHINE,HAND11
May 13, 2005CHAIN,AMPUTATED,FINGER,CLEANING,CAUGHT BETWEEN,SPROCKET,HAND11
Jul 2, 2004FRACTURE,MAINTENANCE,FOOD PREPARATION,BELT,GUARD,LOCKOUT,ROLLER--MACH/PART,CAUGHT BETWEEN,CONVEYOR,WRIST11
Mar 25, 2003AMPUTATED,THUMB,CRUSHED,HAND,WRIST11
May 22, 1999CHAIN,MAINTENANCE,ROTATING PARTS,AMPUTATED,FINGER,WORK RULES,CAUGHT BY,SPROCKET,UNGUARDED1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
9 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 9 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Aug 2003 – Aug 2005Tortilla Manufacturing0

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MISSION FOODS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for MISSION FOODS, not this location alone

Total cases
1
Unfair labor practice
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other MISSION FOODS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
32-CA-024489Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Jun 2009ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MISSION FOODS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for MISSION FOODS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
MISSION FOODS CORPORATION
11559 JERSEY BLVD. · RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, 91730
WaterRCRANo Violation Identified00View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MISSION FOODS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-09-19Complaint0$0
2025-09-15Complaint0$0
2012-06-14Accident0$0
2006-01-25Unprogrammed Related1$300
2005-06-10Accident21$3,450
2004-07-15Accident1$300
2003-04-02Accident1$750
1999-07-08Accident0$0
1997-04-17Accident3$1,050

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other grocery and related products merchant wholesalers within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MISSION FOODS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is MISSION FOODS's OSHA violation history?
MISSION FOODS has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $5,850 in total penalties.
How does MISSION FOODS's safety record compare to its industry?
MISSION FOODS operates in the other grocery and related products merchant wholesalers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.2. MISSION FOODS's self-reported DART rate is 6.67 compared to an industry average of 3.4.